PreprintCited by 4Complement system in diseasesProtein Structure and DynamicsBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural modelling of human complement FHR1 and two of its synthetic derivatives provides insight into their in-vivo functions

Open access
Ruiz-Molina, Natalia, Parsons, Juliana, Decker, Eva L., Reski, Ralf·2022·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.002 · Paper page

Abstract

Human complement is the first line of defence against invading pathogens and is involved in tissue homeostasis. Complement-targeted therapies to treat several diseases caused by a dysregulated complement are highly desirable. Despite huge efforts invested in their development, only very few are currently available, and a deeper understanding of the numerous interactions and complement regulation mechanisms is indispensable. Two important complement regulators are human Factor H (FH) and Factor H-related protein 1 (FHR1). MFHR1 and MFHR13, two promising therapeutic candidates based on these regulators, combine the dimerization and C5-regulatory domains of FHR1 with the central C3-regulatory and cell surface-recognition domains of FH. Here, we used AlphaFold2 to model the structure of these two synthetic regulators. Moreover, we used AlphaFold-Multimer (AFM) to study possible interactions of C3 fragments and membrane attack complex (MAC) components C5, C7 and C9 in complex with FHR1, MFHR1, MFHR13 as well as the best-known MAC regulators vitronectin (Vn), clusterin and CD59, whose experimental structures remain undetermined. AFM successfully predicted the binding interfaces of FHR1 and the synthetic regulators with C3 fragments and suggested binding to C3. The models revealed structural differences in binding to these ligands through different interfaces. Additionally, AFM predictions of Vn, clusterin or CD59 with C7 or C9 agreed with previously published experimental results. Because the role of FHR1 as a MAC regulator has been controversial, we analysed possible interactions with C5, C7 and C9. AFM predicted interactions of FHR1 with proteins of the terminal complement complex (TCC) as indicated by experimental observations, and located the interfaces in FHR1 1-2 and FHR 4-5 . According to AFM predictions, FHR1 might partially block the C3b binding site in C5, inhibiting C5 activation, and block C5b-7 complex formation and C9 polymerization, with similar mechanisms of action as clusterin and vitronectin. Here, we generate hypotheses and provide the basis for the design of rational approaches to understand the molecular mechanism of MAC inhibition, which will facilitate the development of further complement therapeutics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.11.24.517849

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1038/nri2620 · DOI
  2. 10.1074/mcp.M115.056473 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/imr.12500 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2021, Complement inhibition at the level of C3 or C5: Mechanistic reasons for ongoing terminal pathway activity, Blood, 137, 443, 10.1182/blood.2020005959 · DOI
  5. Bayly-Jones C , Bubeck D , Dunstone MA . The mystery behind membrane insertion: a review of the complement membrane attack complex. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2017;372. · DOI
  6. Merle NS , Church SE , Fremeaux-Bacchi V , Roumenina LT . Complement system part I - molecular mechanisms of activation and regulation. Front Immunol 2015;6:262. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02627.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1017087108 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1219260110 · DOI
  10. Dopler A , Stibitzky S , Hevey R , Mannes M , Guariento M , Höchsmann B , et al. Deregulation of Factor H by Factor H-related protein 1 depends on sialylation of host surfaces. Front Immunol 2021;12:201. · DOI
  11. 2021, Molecular bases for the association of FHR-1 with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and other diseases, Blood, 137, 3484, 10.1182/blood.2020010069 · DOI
  12. 10.1182/blood-2009-02-205641 · DOI
  13. Ruiz-Molina N , Parsons J , Müller M , Hoernstein SNW , Bohlender LL , Pumple S , et al. A synthetic protein as efficient multitarget regulator against complement over-activation.Commun Biol 2022;5:152. · DOI
  14. 2018, Complement activation contributes to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus pathogenesis, MBio, 9, e01753
  15. 2020, Dengue virus and the complement alternative pathway, FEBS Lett, 594, 2543, 10.1002/1873-3468.13730 · DOI
  16. 10.1172/JCI10323 · DOI
  17. Gao T , Zhu L , Liu H , Zhang X , Wang T , Fu Y , et al. Highly pathogenic coronavirus N protein aggravates inflammation by MASP-2-mediated lectin complement pathway overactivation. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022;7:318. · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nrneph.2016.70 · DOI
  19. 2022, Evaluating the clinical utility of measuring levels of factor H and the related proteins, Mol Immunol, 151, 166, 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.08.010 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00552.x · DOI
  21. 10.1681/ASN.2015070745 · DOI
  22. 10.4049/jimmunol.1300269 · DOI
  23. 10.4049/jimmunol.1203548 · DOI
  24. 2015, An extended mini-complement factor H molecule ameliorates experimental C3 glomerulopathy, Kidney Int, 88, 1314, 10.1038/ki.2015.233 · DOI
  25. 10.1681/ASN.2017070738 · DOI
  26. Top O , Parsons J , Bohlender LL , Michelfelder S , Kopp P , Busch-Steenberg C , et al. Recombinant production of MFHR1, a novel synthetic multitarget complement inhibitor, in moss bioreactors. Front Plant Sci 2019;10:260. · DOI
  27. Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , Antropova N , Senior A , Green T , et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. BioRxiv 2022:doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Yin R , Feng BY , Varshney A , Pierce BG . Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants. Protein Sci 2022;31:e4379. · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2022, Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2, Nat Commun, 13, 1265, 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2022, Single- sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning, Nat Biotechnol, 40, 1617, 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
  32. Schmidt CQ , Herbert AP , Mertens HDT , Guariento M , Soares DC , Uhrin D , et al. The central portion of factor H (modules 10–15) is compact and contains a structurally deviant CCP module. J Mol Biol 2010;395:105. · DOI
  33. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz828 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nature04005 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/ni.1755 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nsmb.2018 · DOI
  37. 2020, Characterization of binding properties of individual functional sites of human complement factor H, Front Immunol, 11, 1728, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01728 · DOI
  38. Morgan HP , Mertens HDT , Guariento M , Schmidt CQ , Soares DC , Svergun DI , et al. Structural analysis of the C-terminal region (Modules 18–20) of complement regulator Factor H (FH). PLoS One 2012;7:32187. · DOI
  39. 2016, Selectivity of C3-opsonin targeted complement inhibitors: A distinct advantage in the protection of erythrocytes from paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria patients, Immunobiology, 221, 503, 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.12.009 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nature05172 · DOI
  41. 2022, DEMO2: Assemble multi-domain protein structures by coupling analogous template alignments with deep-learning inter- domain restraint prediction, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, W235, 10.1093/nar/gkac340 · DOI
  42. van Breugel M , Rosa e Silva I, Andreeva A. Structural validation and assessment of AlphaFold2 predictions for centrosomal and centriolar proteins and their complexes. Commun Biol 2022;5:312. · DOI
  43. 2022, AlphaFold2: A role for disordered protein/region prediction?, Int J Mol Sci, 23, 4591, 10.3390/ijms23094591 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2013.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1073/pnas.1102167108 · DOI
  46. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501919 · DOI
  47. Papp A , Papp K , Uzonyi B , Cserhalmi M , Csincsi ÁI , Szabó Z , et al. Complement Factor H-related proteins FHR1 and FHR5 interact with extracellular matrix ligands, reduce Factor H regulatory activity and enhance complement activation. Front Immunol 2022;13:935. · DOI
  48. 10.1038/ni.1756 · DOI
  49. 10.1074/jbc.M114.630871 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nsmb.3196 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.003 · DOI
  52. 2021, Complement catalyzing glomerular diseases, Cell Tissue Res, 385, 355, 10.1007/s00441-021-03485-w · DOI
  53. Macpherson A , Laabei M , Ahdash Z , Graewert M , Birtley JR , Schulze MSED , et al. The allosteric modulation of complement C5 by knob domain peptides. Elife 2021;10:e63586. · DOI
  54. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004043 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/emboj.2010.341 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/eji.1830260922 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/s41467-019-10058-7 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/s41467-018-07653-5 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/s41467-021-26366-w · DOI
  60. 2015, Supported lipid bilayer platform to test inhibitors of the membrane attack complex: insights into biomacromolecular assembly and regulation, Biomacromolecules, 16, 3594, 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01060 · DOI
  61. 10.1021/bi00411a029 · DOI
  62. 1995, Complement inhibition by human vitronectin involves non-heparin binding domains, Clin Exp Immunol, 101, 136
  63. Erijman A , Rosenthal E , Shifman JM . How structure defines affinity in protein-protein interactions. PLoS One 2014;9:e110085. · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1993.tb05956.x · DOI
  65. 1993, Clusterin, the human apolipoprotein and complement inhibitor, binds to complement C7, CSP, and the b domain of C9, J Immunol, 151, 2159, 10.4049/jimmunol.151.4.2159 · DOI
  66. 10.1021/bi962895r · DOI
  67. 10.1074/jbc.M603690200 · DOI
  68. 10.1021/bi970832i · DOI
  69. 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10665 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/s41467-022-33729-4 · DOI
  71. 2022, The three C-terminal domains of FHR1 influence complement activation and FHR1 cooperation with other complement regulators, Kidney Int Reports, 7, S437, 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.020 · DOI
  72. 2021, Factor H-related protein 1: a complement regulatory protein and guardian of necrotic-type surfaces, Br J Pharmacol, 178, 2823, 10.1111/bph.15290 · DOI
  73. 2022, Complement Factor H related protein 1 and immune inflammatory disorders, Mol Immunol, 145, 43, 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.03.117 · DOI
  74. 2020, Deficiency of mouse FHR-1 homolog, FHR-E, accelerates sepsis, and acute kidney injury through enhancing the LPS-induced alternative complement pathway, Front Immunol, 11, 1123, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01123 · DOI
  75. 2019, Elucidating the immune evasion mechanisms of Borrelia mayonii, the causative agent of Lyme disease, Front Immunol, 10, 2722, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02722 · DOI
  76. 2020, Complement evasion mechanisms of the systemic pathogens Yersiniae and Salmonellae, FEBS Lett, 594, 2598, 10.1002/1873-3468.13771 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/nar/gkab375 · DOI
  78. 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
  79. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu744 · DOI
  80. 10.1039/C5MB00640F · DOI
  81. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw280 · DOI
  82. Pang Y , Liu B . TransDFL: identification of disordered flexible linkers in proteins by transfer learning. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2022. In press. · DOI
  83. 2019, HawkDock: a web server to predict and analyze the protein–protein complex based on computational docking and MM/GBSA, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, W322, 10.1093/nar/gkz397 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ruiz-Molina, N., Parsons, J., Decker, E. L., & Reski, R.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-11-24
Volume
21
Pages
1473-1486
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319072248
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC‐2189)
  • German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Keywords
complement factor H, complement regulatory proteins, membrane attack complex, vitronectin, clusterin, CD59, complement therapeutics, protein-protein interaction, binding interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review