PreprintCited by 23Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Local Analysis deconstructs protein - protein interfaces and accurately estimates binding affinity changes upon mutation

Open access
Behbahani, Yasser Mohseni, Laine, Elodie, Carbone, Alessandra·2022·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad231 · Paper page

Abstract

A bstract: The spectacular recent advances in protein and protein complex structure prediction hold promise for reconstructing interactomes at large scale and residue resolution. Beyond determining the 3D arrangement of interacting partners, modeling approaches should be able to unravel the impact of sequence variations on the strength of the association. In this work, we report on Deep Local Analysis (DLA), a novel and efficient deep learning framework that relies on a strikingly simple deconstruction of protein interfaces into small locally oriented residue-centered cubes and on 3D convolutions recognizing patterns within cubes. Merely based on the two cubes associated with the wild-type and the mutant residues, DLA accurately estimates the binding affinity change for the associated complexes. It achieves a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.81 on more than 2 000 mutations, and its generalization capability to unseen complexes is higher than the state-of-the-art methods. We show that taking into account the evolutionary constraints on residues contributes to predictions. We also discuss the influence of conformational variability on performance. Beyond the predictive power on the effects of mutations, DLA is a general framework for transferring the knowledge gained from the available non-redundant set of complex protein structures to various tasks. For instance, given a single partially masked cube, it recovers the identity and physico-chemical class of the central residue. Given an ensemble of cubes representing an interface, it predicts the function of the complex. Source code and models are available at http://gitlab.lcqb.upmc.fr/DLA/DLA.git .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.12.04.519031

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Martin Abadi , Paul Barham , Jianmin Chen , Zhifeng Chen , Andy Davis , Jeffrey Dean , Matthieu Devin , Sanjay Ghemawat , Geoffrey Irving , Michael Isard , Manjunath Kudlur , Josh Levenberg , Rajat Monga , Sherry Moore , Derek G. Murray , Benoit Steiner , Paul Tucker , Vijay Vasudevan , Pete Warden , Martin Wicke , Yuan Yu , and Xiaoqiang Zheng . TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. pp. 265–283, 2016.
  2. 2022, Protein sequence design with a learned potential, Nature Communications, 13, 746, 10.1038/s41467-022-28313-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2018, Flex ddG: Rosetta Ensemble-Based Estimation of Changes in Protein–Protein Binding Affinity upon Mutation, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 122, 5389, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11367 · DOI
  4. 2021, Learning the protein language: Evolution, structure, and function, Cell Systems, 12, 654, 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
  6. Lasse M. Blaabjerg , Maher M. Kassem , Lydia L. Good , Nicolas Jonsson , Matteo Cagiada , Kristoffer E. Johansson , Wouter Boomsma , Amelie Stein , and Kresten Lindorff-Larsen . Rapid protein stability prediction using deep learning representations, August 2022. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2012, A Protein Solvation Model Based on Residue Burial, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 8, 2141, 10.1021/ct3001552 · DOI
  8. 2022, SCOPe: improvements to the structural classification of proteins – extended database to facilitate variant interpretation and machine learning, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, D553, 10.1093/nar/gkab1054 · DOI
  9. 2020, Multiple protein-DNA interfaces unravelled by evolutionary information, physico-chemical and geometrical properties, PLOS Computational Biology, 16, e1007624, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007624 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.056 · DOI
  11. J. Dauparas , I. Anishchenko , N. Bennett , H. Bai , R. J. Ragotte , L. F. Milles , B. I. M. Wicky , A. Courbet , R. J. de Haas , N. Bethel , P. J. Y. Leung , T. F. Huddy , S. Pellock , D. Tischer , F. Chan , B. Koepnick , H. Nguyen , A. Kang , B. Sankaran , A. K. Bera , N. P. King , and D. Baker . Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN, June 2022. · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/humu.21656 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.004 · DOI
  14. 2019, Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1, 4171
  15. 2016, Modeling and fitting protein-protein complexes to predict change of binding energy, Scientific Reports, 6, 25406, 10.1038/srep25406 · DOI
  16. 2011, Accelerated Profile HMM Searches, PLOS Computational Biology, 7, e1002195, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ahmed Elnaggar , Michael Heinzinger , Christian Dallago , Ghalia Rehawi , Yu Wang , Llion Jones , Tom Gibbs , Tamas Feher , Christoph Angerer , Martin Steinegger , Debsindhu Bhowmik , and Burkhard Rost . ProtTrans: Towards Cracking the Language of Lifes Code Through Self-Supervised Deep Learning and High Performance Computing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp. 1–1, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2009, Joint Evolutionary Trees: A Large-Scale Method To Predict Protein Interfaces Based on Sequence Sampling, PLOS Computational Biology, 5, e1000267, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000267 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkt1240 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2019, iSEE: Interface structure, evolution, and energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 87, 110, 10.1002/prot.25630 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2019, Finding the ddG spot: Are predictors of binding affinity changes upon mutations in protein–protein interactions ready for it?, WIREs Computational Molecular Science, 9, e1410, 10.1002/wcms.1410 · DOI
  22. 2012, Chapter 4: Protein Interactions and Disease, PLOS Computational Biology, 8, e1002819, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002819 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00442-4 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.06.018 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00065-4 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s12859-019-3220-8 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty862 · DOI
  28. Chloe Hsu , Robert Verkuil , Jason Liu , Zeming Lin , Brian Hie , Tom Sercu , Adam Lerer , and Alexander Rives . Learning inverse folding from millions of predicted structures. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8946–8970, June 2022. · DOI
  29. 2015, Drug target prioritization by perturbed gene expression and network information, Scientific Reports, 5, 17417, 10.1038/srep17417 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2019, SKEMPI 2.0: an updated benchmark of changes in protein–protein binding energy, kinetics and thermodynamics upon mutation, Bioinformatics, 35, 462, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty635 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2017, PROXiMATE: a database of mutant protein–protein complex thermodynamics and kinetics, Bioinformatics, 33, 2787, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx312 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/35075138 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.10.002 · DOI
  35. 2015, Local Geometry and Evolutionary Conservation of Protein Surfaces Reveal the Multiple Recognition Patches in Protein-Protein Interactions, PLOS Computational Biology, 11, e1004580, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004580 · DOI
  36. 2019, GEMME: A Simple and Fast Global Epistatic Model Predicting Mutational Effects, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 36, 2604, 10.1093/molbev/msz179 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.028 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2018, dbMPIKT: a database of kinetic and thermodynamic mutant protein interactions, BMC Bioinformatics, 19, 455, 10.1186/s12859-018-2493-7 · DOI
  39. Xianggen Liu , Yunan Luo , Sen Song , and Jian Peng . Pre-training of Graph Neural Network for Modeling Effects of Mutations on Protein-Protein Binding Affinity. arXiv:2008.12473 [cs, q-bio], August 2020. · arXiv
  40. Céline Marquet , Michael Heinzinger , Tobias Olenyi , Christian Dallago , Kyra Erckert , Michael Bernhofer , Dmitrii Nechaev , and Burkhard Rost . Embeddings from protein language models predict conservation and variant effects. Human Genetics, December 2021. · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2021, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 29287
  42. 2003, A new method for mapping macromolecular topography, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 21, 463, 10.1016/S1093-3263(02)00203-6 · DOI
  43. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1032816/v1 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts489 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Yasser Mohseni Behbahani , Simon Crouzet , Elodie Laine , and Alessandra Carbone . Deep Local Analysis evaluates protein docking conformations with locally oriented cubes. Bioinformatics, p. btac551, August 2022. · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq076 · DOI
  47. 2007, Statistical analysis of physical-chemical properties and prediction of protein-protein interfaces, Journal of Molecular Modeling, 13, 1157, 10.1007/s00894-007-0237-0 · DOI
  48. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066273 · DOI
  49. 2019, Protein model quality assessment using 3D oriented convolutional neural networks, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 35, 3313, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz122 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkw458 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Janet Piñero , Núria Queralt-Rosinach , Àlex Bravo , Jordi Deu-Pons , Anna Bauer-Mehren , Martin Baron , Ferran Sanz , and Laura I. Furlong . DisGeNET: a discovery platform for the dynamical exploration of human diseases and their genes. Database, 2015(bav028), January 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Roshan Rao , Joshua Meier , Tom Sercu , Sergey Ovchinnikov , and Alexander Rives . Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learners. bioRxiv, p. 2020.12.15.422761, December 2020.
  54. 2018, Local Interaction Signal Analysis Predicts Protein-Protein Binding Affinity, Structure, 26, 905, 10.1016/j.str.2018.04.006 · DOI
  55. Alexander Rives , Joshua Meier , Tom Sercu , Siddharth Goyal , Zeming Lin , Jason Liu , Demi Guo , Myle Ott , C. Lawrence Zitnick , Jerry Ma , and Rob Fergus . Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), April 2021. · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1093/nar/gkz383 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/nar/gkab273 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.str.2011.03.019 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 2022, Topsy-Turvy: integrating a global view into sequence-based PPI prediction, Bioinformatics, 38, i264, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac258 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/pro.2829 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.023 · DOI
  62. 10.1186/1471-2105-15-304 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 2020, Breast Cancer Candidate Gene Detection Through Integration of Subcellular Localization Data With Protein–Protein Interaction Networks, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, 19, 556, 10.1109/TNB.2020.2990178 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3904 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.7554/eLife.07454 · DOI
  68. Ashish Vaswani , Noam Shazeer , Niki Parmar , Jakob Uszkoreit , Llion Jones , Aidan N Gomez , Łukasz Kaiser , and Illia Polosukhin . Attention is All you Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
  69. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 116
  71. 2022, Implications of disease-related mutations at protein–protein interfaces, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 72, 219, 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.11.012 · DOI
  72. 2017, BindProfX: Assessing Mutation-Induced Binding Affinity Change by Protein Interface Profiles with Pseudo-Counts, Journal of Molecular Biology, 429, 426, 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.022 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 2020, MutaBind2: Predicting the Impacts of Single and Multiple Mutations on Protein-Protein Interactions, iScience, 23, 100939, 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100939 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Zuobai Zhang , Minghao Xu , Arian Jamasb , Vijil Chenthamarakshan , Aurelie Lozano , Payel Das , and Jian Tang . Protein Representation Learning by Geometric Structure Pretraining, May 2022. arXiv:2203.06125 [cs]. · arXiv
  75. 2020, Mutation effect estimation on protein–protein interactions using deep contextualized representation learning, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics, 2, lqaa015, 10.1093/nargab/lqaa015 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Behbahani, Y. M., Laine, E., & Carbone, A.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Carbone, Alessandra
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-12-07
Volume
39
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
i544-i552
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382632548
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein-protein interfaces, binding affinity prediction, 3D convolution, protein complex structure, evolutionary constraints, conformational heterogeneity, protein function prediction, protein-protein interaction prediction
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Mutation, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review