The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural screens identify candidate human homologs of insect chemoreceptors and cryptic Drosophila gustatory receptor-like proteins
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.85537
Abstract
Insect Odorant receptors and Gustatory receptors define a superfamily of seven-transmembrane domain ligand-gated ion channels (termed here 7TMICs), with homologs identified across Animalia except Chordata. Previously, we used sequence-based screening methods to reveal conservation of this family in unicellular eukaryotes and plants (DUF3537 proteins) (Benton et al ., 2020). Here we combine three-dimensional structure-based screening, ab initio protein folding predictions, phylogenetics and expression analyses to characterize additional candidate homologs with tertiary but little or no primary structural similarity to known 7TMICs, including proteins in disease-causing Trypanosoma. Unexpectedly, we identify structural similarity between 7TMICs and PHTF proteins, a deeply-conserved family of unknown function, whose human orthologs display enriched expression in testis, cerebellum and muscle. We also discover divergent groups of 7TMICs in insects, which we term the Gustatory receptor-like (Grl) proteins. Several Drosophila melanogaster Grl s display selective expression in subsets of taste neurons, suggesting that they are previously-unrecognized insect chemoreceptors. Although we cannot exclude the possibility of remarkable structural convergence, our findings support the origin of 7TMICs in a eukaryotic common ancestor, counter previous assumptions of complete loss of 7TMICs in Chordata, and highlight the extreme evolvability of this protein fold, which likely underlies its functional diversification in different cellular contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 78
- 2010, A galaxy of folds, Protein Sci, 19, 124, 10.1002/pro.297 · DOI
- 2015, A vocabulary of ancient peptides at the origin of folded proteins, Elife, 4, e09410, 10.7554/eLife.09410 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-006-6130-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.009 · DOI
- 2020, A putative origin of the insect chemosensory receptor superfamily in the last common eukaryotic ancestor, Elife, 9, e62507, 10.7554/eLife.62507 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040020 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, The origin of the odorant receptor gene family in insects, Elife, 7, e38340, 10.7554/eLife.38340 · DOI
- 2020, The New Tree of Eukaryotes, Trends Ecol Evol, 35, 43, 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0420-8 · DOI
- 10.1089/106652700750050871 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-019-03320-0 · DOI
- 2020, PHTF2 regulates lipids metabolism in gastric cancer, Aging (Albany NY), 12, 6600
- 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.057 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, The structural basis of odorant recognition in insect olfactory receptors, Nature, 597, 126, 10.1038/s41586-021-03794-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00020-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00258-5 · DOI
- 2021, Evolutionary shifts in taste coding in the fruit pest Drosophila suzukii, Elife, 10, e64317, 10.7554/eLife.64317 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060198 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.conb.2015.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.053 · DOI
- Hallgren, J. , Tsirigos, K.D. , Pedersen, M.D. , Almagro Armenteros, J.J. , Marcatili, P. , Nielsen, H. , Krogh, A. , and Winther, O. (2022). DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. bioRxiv, 2022.2004.2008.487609. · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msx281 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_3 · DOI
- Holm, L. (2022). Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res, W210–W215. · DOI
- 2015, Analysis of the expression of PHTF1 and related genes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Cancer Cell Int, 15, 93, 10.1186/s12935-015-0242-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22458 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2015.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkm256 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2012.085 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, WD40-Repeat Proteins in Ciliopathies and Congenital Disorders of Endocrine System, Endocrinol Metab (Seoul), 35, 494, 10.3803/EnM.2020.302 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab971 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.019 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0043-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abk2432 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.2540 · DOI
- 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4393 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/mst171 · DOI
- 10.1006/geno.1999.6079 · DOI
- 2020, Graph Splitting: A Graph-Based Approach for Superfamily-Scale Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction, Syst Biol, 69, 265
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Structural model for ligand binding and channel opening of an insect gustatory receptor, J Biol Chem, 298, 102573, 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102573 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0159 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg2480 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00068-7 · DOI
- 2005, Putative homeodomain transcription factor 1 interacts with the feminization factor homolog fem1b in male germ cells, Biol Reprod, 72, 780, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.035964 · DOI
- 2005, Expression, regulation, and immunolocalization of putative homeodomain transcription factor 1 (PHTF1) in rodent epididymis: evidence for a novel form resulting from proteolytic cleavage, Biol Reprod, 72, 50, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.029850 · DOI
- 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009787 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/geno.1999.5836 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.266932.120 · DOI
- 2012, phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things), Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 217, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x · DOI
- 10.1093/chemse/bjv046 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043322 · DOI
- 2003, Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 Suppl, 2, 14537
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-031721-020452 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms7243 · DOI
- 2020, Structures of three MORN repeat proteins and a re-evaluation of the proposed lipid-binding properties of MORN repeats, PLOS ONE, 15, e0242677, 10.1371/journal.pone.0242677 · DOI
- 2011, Protein folds and protein folding, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 24, 11, 10.1093/protein/gzq096 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00263-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Convergent evolution in structural elements of proteins investigated using cross profile analysis, BMC Bioinf, 13, 11, 10.1186/1471-2105-13-11 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004218 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Benton, R., & Himmel, N. J.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Benton, Richard
- Himmel, Nathaniel J.
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-12-15
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9998090
- OpenAlex
- W4321377849
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Human Frontier Science Program (LT-0003/2022L)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (185377)
- Université de Lausanne
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- National Human Genome Research Institute
- NIH Office of the Director
- National Cancer Institute
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- H2020 European Research Council (833548)
- Common Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Keywords
- taste receptors, olfactory receptors, trypanosomes, protein fold evolution, structure-based screening
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chemoreceptor Cells, Drosophila melanogaster, Humans, Insecta, Phylogeny, Taste, Receptors, Odorant, Insect Proteins, Drosophila Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review