PreprintCited by 28Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural screens identify candidate human homologs of insect chemoreceptors and cryptic Drosophila gustatory receptor-like proteins

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.85537

Abstract

Insect Odorant receptors and Gustatory receptors define a superfamily of seven-transmembrane domain ligand-gated ion channels (termed here 7TMICs), with homologs identified across Animalia except Chordata. Previously, we used sequence-based screening methods to reveal conservation of this family in unicellular eukaryotes and plants (DUF3537 proteins) (Benton et al ., 2020). Here we combine three-dimensional structure-based screening, ab initio protein folding predictions, phylogenetics and expression analyses to characterize additional candidate homologs with tertiary but little or no primary structural similarity to known 7TMICs, including proteins in disease-causing Trypanosoma. Unexpectedly, we identify structural similarity between 7TMICs and PHTF proteins, a deeply-conserved family of unknown function, whose human orthologs display enriched expression in testis, cerebellum and muscle. We also discover divergent groups of 7TMICs in insects, which we term the Gustatory receptor-like (Grl) proteins. Several Drosophila melanogaster Grl s display selective expression in subsets of taste neurons, suggesting that they are previously-unrecognized insect chemoreceptors. Although we cannot exclude the possibility of remarkable structural convergence, our findings support the origin of 7TMICs in a eukaryotic common ancestor, counter previous assumptions of complete loss of 7TMICs in Chordata, and highlight the extreme evolvability of this protein fold, which likely underlies its functional diversification in different cellular contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.12.13.519744

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. 2010, A galaxy of folds, Protein Sci, 19, 124, 10.1002/pro.297 · DOI
  2. 2015, A vocabulary of ancient peptides at the origin of folded proteins, Elife, 4, e09410, 10.7554/eLife.09410 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s00018-006-6130-7 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.009 · DOI
  5. 2020, A putative origin of the insect chemosensory receptor superfamily in the last common eukaryotic ancestor, Elife, 9, e62507, 10.7554/eLife.62507 · DOI
  6. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040020 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2018, The origin of the odorant receptor gene family in insects, Elife, 7, e38340, 10.7554/eLife.38340 · DOI
  9. 2020, The New Tree of Eukaryotes, Trends Ecol Evol, 35, 43, 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/s41586-018-0420-8 · DOI
  11. 10.1089/106652700750050871 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00018-019-03320-0 · DOI
  13. 2020, PHTF2 regulates lipids metabolism in gastric cancer, Aging (Albany NY), 12, 6600
  14. 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.057 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2021, The structural basis of odorant recognition in insect olfactory receptors, Nature, 597, 126, 10.1038/s41586-021-03794-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00020-9 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00258-5 · DOI
  19. 2021, Evolutionary shifts in taste coding in the fruit pest Drosophila suzukii, Elife, 10, e64317, 10.7554/eLife.64317 · DOI
  20. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060198 · DOI
  21. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.conb.2015.06.001 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.053 · DOI
  25. Hallgren, J. , Tsirigos, K.D. , Pedersen, M.D. , Almagro Armenteros, J.J. , Marcatili, P. , Nielsen, H. , Krogh, A. , and Winther, O. (2022). DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. bioRxiv, 2022.2004.2008.487609. · DOI
  26. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_3 · DOI
  28. Holm, L. (2022). Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res, W210–W215. · DOI
  29. 2015, Analysis of the expression of PHTF1 and related genes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Cancer Cell Int, 15, 93, 10.1186/s12935-015-0242-9 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/prot.22458 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.tig.2015.09.005 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nar/gkm256 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nprot.2012.085 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2020, WD40-Repeat Proteins in Ciliopathies and Congenital Disorders of Endocrine System, Endocrinol Metab (Seoul), 35, 494, 10.3803/EnM.2020.302 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkab971 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.019 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41586-018-0043-0 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529 · DOI
  40. 10.1126/science.abk2432 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nn.2540 · DOI
  43. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4393 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/molbev/mst171 · DOI
  45. 10.1006/geno.1999.6079 · DOI
  46. 2020, Graph Splitting: A Graph-Based Approach for Superfamily-Scale Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction, Syst Biol, 69, 265
  47. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2022, Structural model for ligand binding and channel opening of an insect gustatory receptor, J Biol Chem, 298, 102573, 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102573 · DOI
  50. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0159 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nrg2480 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00068-7 · DOI
  53. 2005, Putative homeodomain transcription factor 1 interacts with the feminization factor homolog fem1b in male germ cells, Biol Reprod, 72, 780, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.035964 · DOI
  54. 2005, Expression, regulation, and immunolocalization of putative homeodomain transcription factor 1 (PHTF1) in rodent epididymis: evidence for a novel form resulting from proteolytic cleavage, Biol Reprod, 72, 50, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.029850 · DOI
  55. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009787 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 · DOI
  57. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1006/geno.1999.5836 · DOI
  59. 10.1101/gr.266932.120 · DOI
  60. 2012, phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things), Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 217, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x · DOI
  61. 10.1093/chemse/bjv046 · DOI
  62. 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043322 · DOI
  63. 2003, Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 Suppl, 2, 14537
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1146/annurev-micro-031721-020452 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/ncomms7243 · DOI
  68. 2020, Structures of three MORN repeat proteins and a re-evaluation of the proposed lipid-binding properties of MORN repeats, PLOS ONE, 15, e0242677, 10.1371/journal.pone.0242677 · DOI
  69. 2011, Protein folds and protein folding, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 24, 11, 10.1093/protein/gzq096 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00263-X · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1101/gr.1239303 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 2012, Convergent evolution in structural elements of proteins investigated using cross profile analysis, BMC Bioinf, 13, 11, 10.1186/1471-2105-13-11 · DOI
  74. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004218 · DOI
  76. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Benton, R., & Himmel, N. J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Benton, Richard
  • Himmel, Nathaniel J.
Venue
eLife
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-12-15
Volume
12
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321377849
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Human Frontier Science Program (LT-0003/2022L)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (185377)
  • Université de Lausanne
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
  • NIH Office of the Director
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • H2020 European Research Council (833548)
  • Common Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
taste receptors, olfactory receptors, trypanosomes, protein fold evolution, structure-based screening
MeSH terms
Animals, Chemoreceptor Cells, Drosophila melanogaster, Humans, Insecta, Phylogeny, Taste, Receptors, Odorant, Insect Proteins, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review