PreprintCited by 5Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The Selah trial: A preference-based partially randomized waitlist control study of three stress management interventions

Open access
Proeschold-Bell, Rae Jean, Eagle, David E., Tice, Logan C., Platt, Alyssa, Yao, Jia, Larkins, Jessie S., Kim, Eunsoo Timothy, Rash, Joshua A.·2023·Translational Behavioral Medicine

Preprint — published as 10.1093/tbm/ibae017

Abstract

Objective: Chronic stress can undermine psychological and physiological health. We sought to evaluate three stress management interventions among clergy, accounting for intervention preferences. Methods: United Methodist clergy in North Carolina enrolled in a partially randomized, preference-based waitlist control trial. The interventions were: mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), Daily Examen prayer practice, and Stress Proofing (stress inoculation plus breathing skills). The intervention period spanned 12 weeks with a 12-week follow-up. Daily text message data were collected to assess practice across the 24 weeks. Co-primary outcomes were symptoms of stress using the Calgary Symptoms of Stress Inventory and 48-hour ambulatory heart rate variability (HRV) at 12-weeks post-intervention compared to waitlist control. Survey data were collected at 0, 12 and 24 weeks, with HRV collected at 0 and 12 weeks. Results: 255 participants (mean age=54 years old; 91% white; 48% female) were randomized and initiated an intervention (n=184) or waitlist control (n=71). Compared to waitlist control, lower stress symptoms were found for MBSR participants [Mean Difference (MD)=-0.30, 95% CI:-0.41,-0.20; p <.001] and Stress Proofing (MD=-0.27, 95% CI:-0.40,-0.14; p <.001) at 12 weeks, and Daily Examen participants not until 24 weeks (MD=-0.24, 95% CI:-0.41,-0.08). Only MBSR participants demonstrated improvement in HRV at 12 weeks (MD=+3.32 millisecond; 95% CI:0.21,6.44; p =.036). Conclusions: MBSR demonstrated robust improvement in self-reported and objective physical correlates of stress whereas Stress Proofing and Daily Examen resulted in improvements in self-reported correlates of stress only. These brief practices were sustainable and beneficial for an occupational sample during the COVID pandemic. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04625777 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04625777 )

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.01.24.23284965

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Proeschold-Bell, R. J., Eagle, D. E., Tice, L. C., Platt, A., Yao, J., Larkins, J. S., Kim, E. T., & Rash, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Venue
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-01-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396749170
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Duke Endowment (ORC-2096-SP)
  • Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
stress management interventions, clergy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, stress inoculation training, heart rate variability, stress symptoms, remote intervention, intervention preferences, COVID-19 stress
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Clergy, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Stress, Psychological, Waiting Lists, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review