Cited by 937Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT

Open access
Lindsay, Emily K., Creswell, J. David·2017·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Despite evidence linking trait mindfulness and mindfulness training with a broad range of effects, still little is known about its underlying active mechanisms. Mindfulness is commonly defined as (1) the ongoing monitoring of present-moment experience (2) with an orientation of acceptance. Building on conceptual, clinical, and empirical work, we describe a testable theoretical account to help explain mindfulness effects on cognition, affect, stress, and health outcomes. Specifically, Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT) posits that (1), by enhancing awareness of one's experiences, the skill of attention monitoring explains how mindfulness improves cognitive functioning outcomes, yet this same skill can increase affective reactivity. Second (2), by modifying one's relation to monitored experience, acceptance is necessary for reducing affective reactivity, such that attention monitoring and acceptance skills together explain how mindfulness improves negative affectivity, stress, and stress-related health outcomes. We discuss how MAT contributes to mindfulness science, suggest plausible alternatives to the account, and offer specific predictions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 78 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    In an experimental study that selectively trained attention monitoring only in an 8-week mindfulness meditation course, monitoring skills but not acceptance increased compared with a waitlist control.

    “monitoring skills (Observe), but not acceptance (Accept without Judgment), increased following training compared to a waitlist control.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baas et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
  • Findingcitation

    Five studies have tested the MAT prediction that attention monitoring improves affectively neutral cognitive functioning outcomes.

    “five studies have tested this prediction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
  • Findingcitation

    In a combined sample of meditators and non-meditators, monitoring skills and acceptance skills were related to performance on a focused attention task.

    “in a combined sample of meditators and non-meditators, monitoring skills (Observe) (and also acceptance skills) were related to performance on a focused attention task (Moore & Malinowski, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moore & Malinowski, 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
  • Interpretationreasoning

    Training in both attention monitoring and acceptance is necessary for improving stress outcomes, including subjective and physiological stress reactivity.

    “stress (e.g., subjective and physiological stress reactivity)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Sustained attention improves over mindfulness training as the ability to maintain contact with present-moment experience develops.

    “Over the course of mindfulness training, sustained attention also improves as the ability to maintain contact with present-moment experience develops (Chiesa et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chiesa et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 39
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Self-reported creative behavior increased after attention monitoring training, and increases in Observe skills from pre- to post-training predicted those increases in creative behavior.

    “self-reported creative behavior increased following this attention monitoring training, and increases in Observe skills from pre- to post-training predicted these increases in creative behavior”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baas et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In two student samples, self-reported monitoring tendency was associated with higher task-based perceptual accuracy, while acceptance was unrelated; this relationship held across tasks with and without working memory load.

    “the self-reported tendency to monitor (Observe) was associated with higher task-based perceptual accuracy in two student samples, while acceptance was unrelated to perceptual accuracy; this relationship between monitoring and perceptual accuracy held across tasks with and without working memory load (Anicha, Ode, Moeller, & Robinson, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anicha, Ode, Moeller, & Robinson, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In a student sample, creative performance related to attention monitoring only rather than monitoring and acceptance together; monitoring but not acceptance correlated with creative ideation and self-reported creativity.

    “creative performance in a student sample related to attention monitoring only, rather than monitoring and acceptance together (Baas, Nevicka, & Velden, 2014); specifically, monitoring (Observe), but not acceptance (Accept without Judgment) correlated with creative ideation and self-reported creativity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baas, Nevicka, & Velden, 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attention monitoring and acceptance are distinct and dissociable skills that together form the active mechanisms of mindfulness and mindfulness training effects.

    “Thus, we treat attention monitoring and acceptance as distinct and dissociable skills that together comprise the active mechanisms for mindfulness and mindfulness training effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attention monitoring skills improve more immediately after practice than acceptance skills, which may take longer to cultivate.

    “there is evidence to suggest that attention monitoring skills begin to improve more immediately after practice, while acceptance may take longer to cultivate (Baer, Carmody, & Hunsinger, 2012; Desbordes et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baer, Carmody, & Hunsinger, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Desbordes et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attention monitoring and acceptance instructions are central to many mindfulness training programs, and increases in awareness and nonreactivity are common processes across mindfulness-based interventions.

    “Attention monitoring and acceptance instructions are central to many well-known mindfulness training interventions, and increases in awareness and nonreactivity are considered common processes across mindfulness-based interventions (Chambers, Gullone, & Allen, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chambers, Gullone, & Allen, 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mindfulness training can affect mental and physical health outcomes, including HIV progression, drug abuse risk, depression relapse, and PTSD symptoms.

    “as well as many mental and physical health outcomes (e.g., delaying HIV progression, reducing risk for drug abuse and depression relapse, reducing PTSD symptomatology; Creswell, Myers, Cole, & Irwin, 2009; Bowen et al., 2014; Teasdale et al., 2000; Polusny et al., 2015; for reviews, see Khoury et al., 2013; Ludwig & Kabat-Zinn, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Creswell, Myers, Cole, & Irwin, 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bowen et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Teasdale et al., 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Training in both attention monitoring and acceptance is necessary for improving physical health outcomes, including stress-related immune and disease outcomes.

    “and physical health outcomes (e.g., stress-related immune and disease outcomes).”
    • Also stated in: § MAT Core Tenets · plain
      “improve stress-related health outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attention monitoring depends on selective and executive attention networks; conflict monitoring helps detect mind wandering and orienting helps redirect attention to the chosen focus.

    “This capacity to monitor momentary experience relies on selective and executive attention networks. Specifically, conflict monitoring skills are important for recognizing when the mind wanders from its intended focus (e.g., breath), and orienting skills are necessary to redirect attention back to this focus object (cf. Malinowski, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Malinowski, 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attention monitoring alone enhances attention to affective information and can intensify both negative and positive reactivity, exacerbating negative reactivity and enhancing positive reactivity independently of acceptance.

    “enhancing attention to affective information (potentially intensifying both negative and positive reactivity)”
    • Also stated in: § Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness · plain
      “For affective, stress, and stress-related health outcomes, MAT predicts that paying close attention to one’s experiences (high attention monitoring) will exacerbate negative reactivity (and enhance positive reactivity) independent of acceptance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    MAT proposes that attention monitoring and acceptance are the active mechanisms that distinguish mindfulness from other constructs and interventions, and that their interactions explain mindfulness-specific outcomes.

    “MAT posits that the two basic components of mindfulness (attention monitoring and acceptance) speak directly to the active mechanisms distinguishing it from other psychological constructs and intervention elements, and that these components and their interactions help explain an array of mindfulness-specific outcomes reported in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a clinical sample, acceptance moderated the effect of monitoring on symptoms; among those low in acceptance, high monitoring predicted more rumination, worry, and depressive symptoms and less reappraisal.

    “In a clinical sample, acceptance (Nonreactivity) moderated the effect of monitoring (Observe) on symptoms; among participants low in acceptance, high monitoring predicted higher rumination, worry, and depressive symptoms, and lower reappraisal (Desrosiers, Vine, Curtiss, & Klemanski, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Desrosiers, Vine, Curtiss, & Klemanski, 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In affective contexts, monitoring increases awareness of affective information while acceptance supports early engagement with and disengagement from affective stimuli, reducing further emotional reactivity.

    “When executive attention is exercised in affective contexts, we predict that monitoring increases awareness of affective information, and acceptance facilitates both early engagement with (Teper & Inzlicht, 2013) and disengagement from affective stimuli (Vago & Nakamura, 2011), thus reducing further emotional reactivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Teper & Inzlicht, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vago & Nakamura, 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meditation training programs focused on attention training improve selective and executive attention and working memory.

    “meditation training programs that focus on these attention training practices have been shown to improve selective and executive attention ability and working memory (Chiesa et al., 2011; Jha, Krompinger, & Baime, 2007; Lutz, Slagter, Dunne, & Davidson, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chiesa et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jha, Krompinger, & Baime, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lutz, Slagter, Dunne, & Davidson, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Monitoring present-moment experiences by itself is often predictive of higher psychological distress, but it also relates to positive outcomes.

    “The tendency to monitor present-moment experiences–by itself–is often predictive of higher levels of psychological distress, but also relates to positive outcomes (although it’s unclear whether the relationship between monitoring and positive outcomes is driven by a combined tendency to monitor to experiences with acceptance, a hypothesis not tested in any of the reviewed studies).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mindfulness training programs do not teach acceptance in isolation; attention monitoring practices scaffold noticing moment-to-moment experience, which is viewed through an accepting lens.

    “mindfulness training programs do not teach acceptance skills in isolation. Rather, attention monitoring practices provide a scaffold for noticing moment-to-moment experience, which are viewed through an accepting lens.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attention monitoring and acceptance together reduce negative reactivity such as anxiety, depression, and stress, and reduce grasping of positive experiences such as craving and substance use.

    “reduce negative reactivity (e.g., anxiety, depression, stress) and reduce grasping of positive experiences (e.g., craving, substance use).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because monitoring skills may improve before acceptance skills, initial emotional agitation and symptom exacerbation are likely during monitoring practice until acceptance develops to reduce reactivity.

    “MAT posits that initial emotional agitation and symptom exacerbation are likely as monitoring is practiced, until acceptance skills are developed to reduce reactivity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Acceptance is a dynamic emotion regulation skill and a critical mechanism for mindfulness training effects on affective responses, stress reactivity, and stress-related health outcomes.

    “MAT views acceptance as a dynamic emotion regulation skill, and a critical mechanism for mindfulness training effects on altering affective responses (including boosting executive attention in affective contexts), stress reactivity, and stress-related health outcomes.”
    • Also stated in: § MAT Core Tenets · plain
      “Acceptance skills modify the way one relates to present-moment experience, regulating reactivity to affective experience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Acceptance may facilitate self-distancing and reappraisal of negative autobiographical memories, corresponding with decreased subgenual ACC and medial PFC activity.

    “there is some suggestion that acceptance may facilitate self-distancing and reappraisal of negative autobiographical memories, corresponding with comparative decreases in subgenual ACC and medial PFC activity (Kross, Davidson, Weber, & Ochsner, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kross, Davidson, Weber, & Ochsner, 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The reviewed studies suggest that the ability to monitor and attend to stimuli drives the relationship between mindfulness and cognitive functioning, while acceptance adds no additional benefit for non-affective cognitive outcomes.

    “Together, these studies begin to suggest that the ability to monitor and attend to stimuli drives the relationship between mindfulness and cognitive functioning (creativity, perceptual accuracy, attentional performance), while acceptance of one’s experience (in four of five studies reviewed) adds no additional benefits for these non-affective cognitive outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Practicing an accepting stance toward emotional experiences may reduce amygdala activation and quicken amygdala recovery, corresponding with emotion regulatory ability.

    “practicing an accepting stance toward emotional experiences may both reduce amygdala activation and quicken amygdala recovery, corresponding with emotion regulatory ability (Desbordes et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Desbordes et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Attention monitoring practices may activate frontal and parietal regions supporting attention orienting and executive-network regions supporting conflict monitoring.

    “attention monitoring practices may activate frontal and parietal brain regions (e.g., frontal eye field, dorsolateral PFC, inferior and superior parietal lobules) supporting attention orienting, as well as the executive network (e.g., ACC, anterior insula, basal ganglia) that supports conflict monitoring (Tang et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tang et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Monitoring skills may increase focus on all types of experiences; without acceptance, this may increase affective reactivity to negative and positive events, and negative affective reactivity may hinder flexible responding on executive attention tasks involving affect regulation.

    “Monitoring skills may increase focus on all types of experiences: without acceptance, this tendency may increase affective reactivity to negative and positive events, and negative affective reactivity may hinder flexible responding on executive attention tasks that involve affect regulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Adopting acceptance modifies the relationship with monitored experiences: negative experiences become less potent, neutral cues can become restful or subtly pleasurable, and positive experiences can be savored.

    “Adopting a mental stance of acceptance modifies one’s relationship with all monitored experiences: salient negatively-valenced experiences become less potent, neutral cues can become a source of rest and subtle pleasure, and positive experiences can be savored in the moment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In affective domains, monitoring skills are often related to higher negative psychological and somatic symptoms, as well as some positive outcomes such as satisfaction with life and posttraumatic growth.

    “In affective domains, monitoring skills are often related to higher negative psychological and somatic symptoms, as well as some positive outcomes (satisfaction with life and posttraumatic growth).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Self-reported acceptance alone is associated with better physical health outcomes.

    “and better physical health outcomes (Consedine & Butler, 2014; Daubenmier, Hayden, Chang, & Epel, 2014; Klein et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Consedine & Butler, 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Daubenmier, Hayden, Chang, & Epel, 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Klein et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attention monitoring and acceptance are likely to be important mechanisms behind mindfulness training intervention effects.

    “we suspect that since attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of all mindfulness accounts, they are likely to be important mechanisms for mindfulness training intervention effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of every account of mindfulness.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    MAT predicts that high levels of monitoring and acceptance together drive reductions in affective reactivity and distress outcomes in healthy populations and reduce symptoms among clinical populations.

    “MAT predicts that high levels of monitoring and acceptance together drive reductions in affective reactivity and distress outcomes in healthy populations and reduce symptoms among clinical populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The monitoring and acceptance components of mindfulness independently and jointly underlie a wide range of outcomes.

    “attention monitoring and acceptance components of mindfulness independently and synergistically underlie a broad range of outcomes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Monitoring heightens and enhances experiences, while acceptance promotes an adaptive response to those experiences.

    “While monitoring heightens and enhances experiences, acceptance promotes an adaptive response to these experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    MAT predicts that attention monitoring is an important mechanism of mindfulness effects on improved affective and stress reduction outcomes, but only with concomitant high levels of acceptance skills.

    “MAT predicts that attention monitoring is an important mechanism of mindfulness effects on improved affective and stress reduction outcomes, but only with concomitant high levels of acceptance skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Higher monitoring skills were associated with lower IL-6, but this relationship was driven by acceptance; participants with high monitoring and acceptance had low IL-6, while monitoring without acceptance was not associated with IL-6.

    “Higher monitoring skills (Observe) were associated with lower IL-6, but this relationship was driven by acceptance (Nonreactivity) toward these experiences: participants reporting higher monitoring and acceptance skills had low IL-6 levels, while the tendency to monitor experiences without a stance of acceptance was not associated with IL-6 levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tomfohr, Pung, Mills, & Edwards, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The review of the literature in light of MAT tenet #2 was constrained because few studies examined the interactive effects of monitoring and acceptance skills in predicting outcomes.

    “Our review of the literature, in light of MAT tenet #2, was constrained because few studies examined the interactive effects of monitoring and acceptance skills in predicting outcomes (most studies examined independent effects of monitoring and acceptance subscales separately).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Noticing one's experiences is probably necessary for appreciating them and for building positive states.

    “noticing experiences is crucial for appreciating them and building positive states”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Garland et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lindsay & Creswell, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Acceptance is as effective as other emotion-regulation strategies at reducing pain ratings and negative affect.

    “and equally effective for reducing pain ratings and negative affect”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kohl, Rief, & Glombiewski, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Attention monitoring alone is related to better cognitive functioning in neutral contexts and is not consistently related to executive function when affect regulation is involved.

    “First, attention monitoring alone is related to better cognitive functioning in neutral contexts (better perceptual accuracy and attentional performance; higher creativity) and not consistently related to executive function when affect regulation is involved (Stroop performance).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    MAT addresses interventions that do not teach acceptance apart from monitoring; they train people to monitor present experience and to meet what is noticed with acceptance so that automatic reactions are regulated.

    “MAT is focused on the mechanisms of mindfulness training interventions where acceptance is not taught independent of monitoring training; instead, mindfulness training interventions teach attention monitoring skills for careful observation of one’s moment-to-moment experience, and acceptance skills are applied to these monitored experiences to regulate automatic reactivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Acceptance cannot be trained without some target object to monitor.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Monitoring one's experiences through practice trains attentional processes and enriches those experiences as they occur in the present.

    “Practice in monitoring one’s experiences trains attentional processes and enhances these experiences as they occur in the present moment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Self-reported acceptance alone is associated with higher well-being, self-esteem, and pro-environmental behavior.

    “higher well-being, self-esteem, and pro-environmental behavior (Barbaro & Pickett, 2016; Cash & Whittingham, 2010; Christopher & Gilbert, 2010);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Barbaro & Pickett, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cash & Whittingham, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Christopher & Gilbert, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Self-reported acceptance alone is associated with lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion dysregulation.

    “lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion dysregulation (Christopher & Gilbert, 2010; Fisak & Lehe, 2012; Paul et al., 2013; Reese et al., 2015);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Christopher & Gilbert, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fisak & Lehe, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Paul et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    MAT provides a theoretical framework outlining the putative active mechanisms of mindfulness training.

    “MAT builds on conceptual, clinical, and empirical work to provide a theoretical framework outlining the putative active mechanisms of mindfulness training, with the hope that by understanding mechanisms we can develop and deliver more effective and efficient interventions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Attention monitoring skills alone are associated with better cognitive functioning on non-affective tasks, but do not reliably predict executive attention on tasks that rely on both attentional control and affect regulation.

    “These findings indicate that attention monitoring skills alone (1a) are associated with better cognitive functioning on non-affective tasks (e.g., perceptual accuracy, attentional performance, creativity), but (1b) do not reliably predict executive attention on tasks that rely on both attentional control and affect regulation (e.g., Stroop task).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Acceptance changes how a person relates to the content of monitored experience, reducing affective reactivity and yielding various benefits in affective and physical health.

    “Acceptance modifies the way an individual relates to the content of monitored experience, tempering affective reactivity to produce a variety of beneficial outcomes across affective and physical health domains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Acceptance is probably necessary for lowering symptoms and for reducing clinging to positive experiences.

    “acceptance appears to be essential for reducing symptoms (and the grasping of positive experiences)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Garland et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lindsay & Creswell, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

45 of 45
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The literature lacks a theory connecting the psychological mechanisms of mindfulness to the many reported mindfulness-related outcomes.

    “Yet, despite these advances, still little theory links the psychological mechanisms of mindfulness with the broad variety of mindfulness-related outcomes reported in the literature.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is little experimental work directly testing MAT.

    “it is a new theoretical account and as such there is little experimental work directly testing it.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.

    “assuming meaningful (albeit imperfect) associations between the development of monitoring and acceptance skills through mindfulness training and the self-reporting of these same skills.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.

    “assuming that the tendency to monitor experience in the samples reviewed does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept those experiences.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The FFMQ Observe, Nonreactivity, and Nonjudgment subscales validly measure attention monitoring and acceptance skills.

    “We also only reviewed results from mindfulness subscales that clearly map onto attention monitoring and acceptance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Acceptance cannot be trained without some target object to monitor.

    “it’s not clear how acceptance would be trained in the absence of a target object to monitor with acceptance”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of every account of mindfulness.

    “since attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of all mindfulness accounts”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Monitor and Acceptance Theory suggests that the mechanism behind stress reduction through mindfulness training is divided into two steps: first monitoring attentional and interoceptive capacities, second acceptance managing increased receptivity to stress signals.

    “The Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT; 24) suggests that the mechanism behind stress reduction through mindfulness training is divided into two steps following each other: First, participants learn attentional and interoceptive capacities (monitoring). Second, they develop emotional capacities, focusing on strengthening a sense of acceptance, which manages”

    From Reducing neuroendocrine psychosocial stress response through socio-emotional dyadic but not mindfulness online training (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness has previously been associated with stress reduction and improved relaxation, among other benefits.

    “Mindfulness has previously been associated with stress reduction and improved relaxation, among other benefits [16,58,59].”

    From Web-Based Mindfulness Meditation as an Adjunct to Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Public Safety Personnel: Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation Study (2024) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Abstract says randomized trials indicate that mindfulness training can reduce stress and benefit other outcomes. It does not identify improved relaxation as an outcome; a targeted search for relaxation found no supporting passage in our copy. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Research evidence suggests that MABI's underlying mechanisms may be very relevant in order to help athletes to manage their internal experiences more effectively and maintain optimal functioning in highly demanding performance environments.

    “Research evidence suggests that these MABI's underlying mechanisms may be very relevant in order to help athletes to manage their internal experiences more effectively and maintain optimal functioning in highly demanding performance environments (for reviews, see Bühlmayer et al., 2017; Gardner & Moore, 2012, 2017; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017; Noetel et al., 2017; Sappington &am”

    From Integrated mindfulness-based intervention: Effects on mindfulness skills, cognitive interference and performance satisfaction of young elite badminton players. (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017

    The MAT theory’s Acceptance section (page unavailable) describes acceptance as a mechanism for regulating emotional experiences, and the evidence review’s Tenet #2 section links monitoring plus acceptance to cognitive performance under emotional demands. The paper does not establish that these mechanisms help athletes maintain optimal functioning in demanding performance environments; the reviewed evidence concerns cognitive tasks and other non-athlete samples. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT), attention monitoring and acceptance skills should not be taught in isolation but rather together, considering their potential synergistic effects.

    “Moreover, according to Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017), these two mechanisms should not be taught in isolation but rather together, considering their potential synergistic effects.”

    From Integrated mindfulness-based intervention: Effects on mindfulness skills, cognitive interference and performance satisfaction of young elite badminton players. (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017

    The MAT and Acceptance sections describe synergistic effects of monitoring and acceptance and propose teaching them together for affective, stress, and health outcomes. But the categorical advice not to teach either skill in isolation goes beyond the paper: MAT says monitoring alone is sufficient for some cognitive outcomes, and the General Discussion considers possible benefits of acceptance alone. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both stronger evidence and enhanced knowledge about the MABI's underlying active mechanisms are still needed in order to achieve more effective interventions for the desired outcomes related to sport performance among elite athletes.

    “Nevertheless, both stronger evidence and enhanced knowledge about the MABI's underlying active mechanisms are still needed in order to achieve more effective interventions for the desired outcomes related to sport performance among elite athletes (Gardner & Moore, 2017; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017; Noetel et al., 2017).”

    From Integrated mindfulness-based intervention: Effects on mindfulness skills, cognitive interference and performance satisfaction of young elite badminton players. (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017

    The Literature Review: Summary says it is premature to draw strong conclusions about the active mechanisms of mindfulness effects, and the General Discussion calls for mechanistic research to help tailor more effective interventions. The paper discusses clinical, cognitive, and health outcomes, however, not sport performance among elite athletes. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Acceptance is not central to every account described

    Minor

    The claim that acceptance is central to all mindfulness accounts conflicts with the paper's description of accounts that treat it as a separate construct rather than a central component.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

13 of the 152 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pickert, 2014, The mindful revolution, Time

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lindsay, Emily K.
  • Creswell, J. David
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
51
Pages
48-59
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2548953146
Cited by
919
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM081760)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT008493, R01AT008685)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness training, attention monitoring, acceptance, trait mindfulness, emotional reactivity, negative affectivity, stress, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Attention, Awareness, Humans, Meditation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review