PreprintCited by 5Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sequence assignment validation in protein crystal structure models with checkMySequence

Open access
Chojnowski, Grzegorz·2023·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1107/s2059798323003765 · Paper page

Abstract

Sequence register shifts remain one of the most elusive errors in experimental macromolecular models. They may affect model interpretation and propagate to newly built models from older structures. In a recent publication I have shown that register shifts in cryo-EM models of proteins can be detected using a systematic re-assignment of short model fragments to the target sequence. Here, I show that the same approach can be used to detect register shifts in crystal structure models using standard, model-bias corrected electron-density maps. I describe in detail five register shift errors detected using the method in models deposited in the PDB. Synopsis: I show that checkMySequence , an automated method for validating sequence assignment in cryo-EM structures of proteins, can be used for validating crystal structure models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.02.17.528951

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 2020, Nucleic acids research, 48, D335
  2. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/355472a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/febs.15314 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gky1004 · DOI
  7. 2020, Protein Science, 29, 1055, 10.1002/pro.3791 · DOI
  8. 2017, Nature Chemical Biology, 13, 779, 10.1038/nchembio.2385 · DOI
  9. 2022, Acta Crystallographica Section D 78 2059-7983, 78, 1
  10. 10.1107/S2052252521011088 · DOI
  11. 2021, Biophys J, 120, 1085, 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.12.029 · DOI
  12. 2002, CCP4 Newsl. Protein Crystallogr, 40, 82
  13. 10.1016/j.str.2017.10.009 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/381272a0 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2022, Nat Methods, 19, 15, 10.1038/s41592-021-01365-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1107/S2052252514009324 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007515 · DOI
  19. 10.1107/S0907444901012458 · DOI
  20. 2012, Journal of molecular biochemistry, 1, 76
  21. 2022, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology, 78, 1079, 10.1107/S2059798322007987 · DOI
  22. 10.1107/S0021889892009944 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2011, Acta Crystallographica Section D, 67, 355, 10.1107/S0907444911001314 · DOI
  25. 2022, Nucleic Acids Research, 51, D418
  26. 2020, Protein Sci, 29, 315, 10.1002/pro.3786 · DOI
  27. 10.1107/S0108767386099622 · DOI
  28. Sánchez Rodríguez, F. , Chojnowski, G. , Keegan, R. M. & Rigden, D. J. (2022). Acta Crystallographica Section D 2059-7983 78. · DOI · Paper page
  29. 2018, Scientific reports, 8, 1
  30. 10.1016/j.str.2020.08.005 · DOI
  31. Terwilliger, T. C. , Leibschner, D. L. , Croll, T. , Williams, C. J. , McCoy, A. J. , Poon, B. K. , Afonine, P. , Oeffner, R. D. , Richardson, J. S. & Read, R. J. (2022). bioRxiv.
  32. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.005 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1111/febs.14320 · DOI
  36. 2016, Journal of applied crystallography, 49, 1081, 10.1107/S1600576716004428 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chojnowski, G.
Affiliations
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Chojnowski, Grzegorz
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-02-17
Volume
79
Issue
7
Pages
559-568
ISSN
2059-7983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380575664
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
model validation, electron density maps, model bias correction
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review