Cited by 11Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using deep-learning predictions of inter-residue distances for model validation

Open access
Sánchez Rodríguez, Filomeno, Chojnowski, Grzegorz, Keegan, Ronan M., Rigden, Daniel J.·2022·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Determination of protein structures typically entails building a model that satisfies the collected experimental observations and its deposition in the Protein Data Bank. Experimental limitations can lead to unavoidable uncertainties during the process of model building, which result in the introduction of errors into the deposited model. Many metrics are available for model validation, but most are limited to consideration of the physico-chemical aspects of the model or its match to the experimental data. The latest advances in the field of deep learning have enabled the increasingly accurate prediction of inter-residue distances, an advance which has played a pivotal role in the recent improvements observed in the field of protein ab initio modelling. Here, new validation methods are presented based on the use of these precise inter-residue distance predictions, which are compared with the distances observed in the protein model. Sequence-register errors are particularly clearly detected and the register shifts required for their correction can be reliably determined. The method is available in the ConKit package (https://www.conkit.org).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s2059798322010415

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Afonine, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 814, 10.1107/S2059798318009324 · DOI
  2. Andonov, 2011, J. Comput. Biol., 18, 27, 10.1089/cmb.2009.0196 · DOI
  3. Baek, 2021, Science, 373, 871, 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Berman, 2000, Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bhatt, 2021, Science, 372, 1306, 10.1126/science.abf3546 · DOI
  6. Brito Querido, 2020, Science, 369, 1220, 10.1126/science.aba4904 · DOI
  7. Burnley, 2017, Acta Cryst. D, 73, 469, 10.1107/S2059798317007859 · DOI
  8. Chiu, 2021, J. Biol. Chem., 296, 100560, 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100560 · DOI
  9. Chojnowski, 2022, Acta Cryst. D, 78, 806, 10.1107/S2059798322005009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chojnowski, 2022, IUCrJ, 9, 86, 10.1107/S2052252521011088 · DOI
  11. Colovos, 1993, Protein Sci., 2, 1511, 10.1002/pro.5560020916 · DOI
  12. Cortes, 1995, Mach. Learn., 20, 273
  13. Croll, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 519, 10.1107/S2059798318002425 · DOI
  14. Croll, 2021, Biophys. J., 120, 1085, 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.12.029 · DOI
  15. Davis, 2007, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W375, 10.1093/nar/gkm216 · DOI
  16. Emsley, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Goddard, 2018, Protein Sci., 27, 14, 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gu, 2019, Science, 364, 1068, 10.1126/science.aaw4852 · DOI
  19. Halfon, 2019, Sci. Rep., 9, 11460, 10.1038/s41598-019-48019-1 · DOI
  20. Han, 2020, Nature, 579, 452, 10.1038/s41586-020-2087-1 · DOI
  21. Hilf, 2008, Nature, 452, 375, 10.1038/nature06717 · DOI
  22. Hooft, 1996, Nature, 381, 272, 10.1038/381272a0 · DOI
  23. Jones, 2022, Nat. Methods, 19, 15, 10.1038/s41592-021-01365-3 · DOI
  24. Joseph, 2016, Methods, 100, 42, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.03.007 · DOI
  25. Joseph, 2022, Acta Cryst. D, 78, 152, 10.1107/S205979832101278X · DOI
  26. Khusainov, 2017, EMBO J., 36, 2073, 10.15252/embj.201696105 · DOI
  27. Kleywegt, 1995, Structure, 3, 535, 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00187-3 · DOI
  28. Krissinel, 2012, J. Mol. Biochem., 1, 76
  29. Kumar, 2021, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2100164118, 10.1073/pnas.2100164118 · DOI
  30. Laskowski, 1993, J. Appl. Cryst., 26, 283, 10.1107/S0021889892009944 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lawson, 2018, J. Struct. Biol., 204, 523, 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.10.004 · DOI
  32. Lawson, 2021, Nat. Methods, 18, 156, 10.1038/s41592-020-01051-w · DOI
  33. Lee, 2021, Sci. Adv., 7, eabd4413, 10.1126/sciadv.abd4413 · DOI
  34. Leidreiter, 2019, Sci. Adv., 5, eaax6497, 10.1126/sciadv.aax6497 · DOI
  35. Liebschner, 2021, Acta Cryst. D, 77, 48, 10.1107/S2059798320015879 · DOI
  36. Lüthy, 1992, Nature, 356, 83, 10.1038/356083a0 · DOI
  37. MacArthur, 1994, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 4, 731, 10.1016/S0959-440X(94)90172-4 · DOI
  38. Mirdita, 2022, Nat. Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Neupane, 2020, eLife, 9, e54575, 10.7554/eLife.54575 · DOI
  40. Nicholls, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 492, 10.1107/S2059798318007313 · DOI
  41. Nottelet, 2021, Sci. Adv., 7, eabf2403, 10.1126/sciadv.abf2403 · DOI
  42. Ovchinnikov, 2017, Science, 355, 294, 10.1126/science.aah4043 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Pan, 2020, Nat. Commun., 11, 5686, 10.1038/s41467-020-19458-6 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Pedregosa, 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825
  45. Peng, 2020, Nature, 579, 615, 10.1038/s41586-020-2114-2 · DOI
  46. Peng, 2017, Cell Res., 27, 853, 10.1038/cr.2017.79 · DOI
  47. Pintilie, 2020, Nat. Methods, 17, 328, 10.1038/s41592-020-0731-1 · DOI
  48. Ramírez-Aportela, 2021, Nat. Commun., 12, 42, 10.1038/s41467-020-20295-w · DOI
  49. Rao, 2018, Cell Res., 28, 143, 10.1038/cr.2017.158 · DOI
  50. Rochira, 2021, Protein Sci., 30, 93, 10.1002/pro.3955 · DOI
  51. Ruiz-Serra, 2021, Proteins, 89, 1888, 10.1002/prot.26248 · DOI
  52. Simkovic, 2017, Bioinformatics, 33, 2209, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx148 · DOI
  53. Sippl, 1993, Proteins, 17, 355, 10.1002/prot.340170404 · DOI
  54. Steinegger, 2017, Nat. Biotechnol., 35, 1026, 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Thoms, 2020, Science, 369, 1249, 10.1126/science.abc8665 · DOI
  56. Touw, 2015, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D364, 10.1093/nar/gku1028 · DOI
  57. Vriend, 1990, J. Mol. Graph., 8, 52, 10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-V · DOI
  58. Vriend, 1993, J. Appl. Cryst., 26, 47, 10.1107/S0021889892008240 · DOI
  59. Weiss, 2016, Hum. Mol. Genet., 25, 4717
  60. Winn, 2011, Acta Cryst. D, 67, 235, 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Yang, 2020, Nature, 588, 521, 10.1038/s41586-020-3007-0 · DOI
  62. Zemla, 2003, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3370, 10.1093/nar/gkg571 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Zhang, 2020, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 7176, 10.1073/pnas.1922638117 · DOI
  64. Zhao, 2016, Cell, 166, 1016, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.020 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Chojnowski, G., Keegan, R. M., & Rigden, D. J.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Rigden, Daniel J.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Published
2022-11-25
Volume
78
Issue
12
Pages
1412-1427
ISSN
2059-7983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310055674
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePubs (Science and Technology Facilities Council, Research Councils UK) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S007105/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
deep learning, ab initio protein structure prediction, Protein Data Bank
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review