Structural Analysis of Genomic and Proteomic Signatures Reveal Dynamic Expression of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Breast Cancer and Tissue
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110640 · Paper page
Abstract
Summary: Structural features of proteins capture underlying information about protein evolution and function, which enhances the analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data. Here we develop S tructural A nalysis of G ene and protein E xpression S ignatures (SAGES), a method that describes expression data using features calculated from sequence-based prediction methods and 3D structural models. We used SAGES, along with machine learning, to characterize tissues from healthy individuals and those with breast cancer. We analyzed gene expression data from 23 breast cancer patients and genetic mutation data from the COSMIC database as well as 17 breast tumor protein expression profiles. We identified prominent expression of intrinsically disordered regions in breast cancer proteins as well as relationships between drug perturbation signatures and breast cancer disease signatures. Our results suggest that SAGES is generally applicable to describe diverse biological phenomena including disease states and drug effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zatorski, N., Sun, Y., Elmas, A., Dallago, C., Karl, T., Stein, D., Rost, B., Huang, K.-L., Walsh, M., & Schlessinger, A.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zatorski, Nicole
- ORCID
- Venue
- iScience
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-02-24
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 110640-110640
- ISSN
- 2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11416222
- OpenAlex
- W4401386769
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r01hd107528-01a1, R01 HD107528)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F30HL160179)
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA271318)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD107528)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- breast cancer, intrinsically disordered regions, protein structural properties, sage, gene expression signatures, proteomic signatures, somatic mutations, protein 3D structure, protein evolution, cancer tissue classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review