PreprintCited by 15Protein Structure and DynamicsCellular Mechanics and InteractionsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the evolution and function of Canoe’s intrinsically disordered region in linking cell-cell junctions to the cytoskeleton during embryonic morphogenesis

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pone.0289224 · Paper page

Abstract

One central question for cell and developmental biologists is defining how epithelial cells can change shape and move during embryonic development without tearing tissues apart. This requires robust yet dynamic connections of cells to one another, via the cell-cell adherens junction, and of junctions to the actin and myosin cytoskeleton, which generates force. The last decade revealed that these connections involve a multivalent network of proteins, rather than a simple linear pathway. We focus on Drosophila Canoe, homolog of mammalian Afadin, as a model for defining the underlying mechanisms. Canoe and Afadin are complex, multidomain proteins that share multiple domains with defined and undefined binding partners. Both also share a long carboxy-terminal intrinsically disordered region (IDR), whose function is less well defined. IDRs are found in many proteins assembled into large multiprotein complexes. We have combined bioinformatic analysis and the use of a series of canoe mutants with early stop codons to explore the evolution and function of the IDR. Our bioinformatic analysis reveals that the IDRs of Canoe and Afadin differ dramatically in sequence and sequence properties. When we looked over shorter evolutionary time scales, we identified multiple conserved motifs. Some of these are predicted by AlphaFold to be alpha-helical, and two correspond to known protein interaction sites for alpha-catenin and F-actin. We next identified the lesions in a series of eighteen canoe mutants, which have early stop codons across the entire protein coding sequence. Analysis of their phenotypes are consistent with the idea that the IDR, including its C-terminal conserved motifs, are important for protein function. These data provide the foundation for further analysis of IDR function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.03.06.531372

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1242/dev.191049 · DOI
  2. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028761 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.aba5528 · DOI
  4. 10.1083/jcb.200904001 · DOI
  5. 10.1091/mbc.E11-05-0411 · DOI
  6. 10.1091/mbc.E19-04-0209 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.M209832200 · DOI
  8. 10.1083/jcb.202104087 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nrm.2017.7 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.09.035 · DOI
  11. 10.1186/s12964-022-00821-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.7554/eLife.60220 · DOI
  13. 10.7554/eLife.46883 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/nar/gks854 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.087 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.01.025 · DOI
  17. 10.1091/mbc.E16-05-0292 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/s12964-020-00703-w · DOI
  19. 10.1083/jcb.139.2.517 · DOI
  20. 10.1083/jcb.201907079 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nsmb.3152 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/gtc.12566 · DOI
  23. 10.1074/jbc.M109.043760 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gks1226 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/nar/gkac240 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.052 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1012675108 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1126/science.1257570 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/s41559-017-0240-5 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.mcn.2018.06.006 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90413-9 · DOI
  34. 1995, Wieschaus E. extradenticle determines segmental identities throughout Drosophila development, Development, 121, 3663, 10.1242/dev.121.11.3663 · DOI
  35. 1984, Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster: II, Zygotic loci on the third chromosome. Roux’s Arch Dev Biol, 193, 283
  36. 10.1093/genetics/165.1.159 · DOI
  37. 10.1242/dev.157941 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0012-1606(89)90180-2 · DOI
  39. 1996, The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 144, 1673, 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1673 · DOI
  40. Garrison E , Marth G . Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv. 2012:1207.3907v2.
  41. 10.1038/ng.806 · DOI
  42. 1987, Dros Inf Serv, 66, 209
  43. 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00151-8 · DOI
  44. 1997, The sidekick gene, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is required for pattern formation in the Drosophila eye, Development, 124, 3303, 10.1242/dev.124.17.3303 · DOI
  45. 10.1242/dev.158246 · DOI
  46. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000522 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.07.007 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/molbev/msi225 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9064 · DOI
  50. 10.1101/gad.10.6.672 · DOI
  51. 10.1101/cshperspect.a032862 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/wrna.1560 · DOI
  53. 10.1083/jcb.202108091 · DOI
  54. Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , Antropova N , Senior A , Green T , et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. . BioRxiv [PREPRINT]. 2021;https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034;. · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Bushnell B. BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-Aware Aligner. Conference: 9th Annual Genomics of Energy & Environment Meeting, Walnut Creek, CA, March 17-20, 2014. 2014:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1241166.
  57. 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 · DOI
  58. 10.4161/fly.19695 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Wieschaus E , Nüsslein-Volhard C . Looking at embryos. In: Roberts DB, editor. Drosophila, A Practical Approach. Oxford, England: IRL Press; 1986. p. 199-228.

Metadata

Authors
Gurley, N. J., Szymanski, R. A., Dowen, R. H., Butcher, T. A., Ishiyama, N., & Peifer, M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Peifer, Mark
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-03-07
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
e0289224-e0289224
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385521187
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118096, R35GM118026, R35GM137985)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
canoes, afadin, intrinsically disordered regions, cell-cell contact, adherens junctions, actin cytoskeleton, myosin, embryonic morphogenesis, protein evolution, conserved motifs, alpha-catenin, F-actin binding, Drosophila

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review