PreprintCited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interfacial residues in protein-protein complexes are in the eyes of the beholder

Open access
Parvathy, Jayadevan, Yazhini, Arangasamy, Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy, Sowdhamini, Ramanathan·2023·Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26628

Abstract

Interactions between proteins are vital in almost all biological processes. The characterization of protein-protein interactions helps us understand the mechanistic basis of biological processes, thereby enabling the manipulation of proteins for biotechnological and clinical purposes. The interface residues of a protein-protein complex are assumed to have the following two properties: a) they always interact with a residue of a partner protein, which forms the basis for distance-based interface residue identification methods, and b) they are solvent-exposed in the isolated form of the protein and become buried in the complex form, which forms the basis for Accessible Surface Area (ASA)-based methods. The study interrogates this popular assumption by recognizing interface residues in protein-protein complexes through these two methods. The study shows that a few residues are identified uniquely by each method, and the extent of conservation, propensities and their contribution to the stability of protein-protein interaction varies substantially between these residues. The case study analyses showed that interface residues, unique to distance, participate in crucial interactions that hold the proteins together, whereas the interface residues unique to the ASA method have a potential role in the recognition, dynamics and specificity of the complex and can also be a hotspot. Overall, the study recommends applying both distance and ASA methods so that some interface residues missed by either method but crucial to the stability, recognition, dynamics and function of protein-protein complexes are identified in a complementary manner.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.04.24.538134

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.01.004 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0065-3233(02)61000-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.016 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2016, Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER, Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma, 54, 5.6.1
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkx407 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/ja026939x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. 2021.10.04.463034 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2022, Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2, Nat. Commun, 13, 1265, 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.10.003 · DOI
  11. Ahmad, S. & Mizuguchi, K . Partner-Aware Prediction of Interacting Residues in Protein-Protein Complexes from Sequence Data. PLOS ONE 6, e29104 (2011). · DOI
  12. 10.1002/prot.24479 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1234 · DOI
  14. 2004, A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein–protein interfaces and its implications, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 13, 1043, 10.1110/ps.03484604 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0424 · DOI
  16. Interaction preferences across protein-protein interfaces of obligatory and non-obligatory components are different | BMC Structural Biology | Full Text. https://bmcstructbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6807-5-15. · DOI
  17. 10.1002/prot.10461 · DOI
  18. 10.2174/138920308785132712 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.07.004 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  21. FoldX web server: an online force field | Nucleic Acids Research | Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/33/suppl_2/W382/2505499. · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/protein/15.8.659 · DOI
  24. 2009, Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 25, 1422
  25. 10.1093/nar/gkm423 · DOI
  26. 10.2174/138920309787847590 · DOI
  27. 2013, An automated approach to network features of protein structure ensembles, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 22, 1399, 10.1002/pro.2333 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkw383 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/protein/3.2.95 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/protein/6.8.873 · DOI
  31. 1971, The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility, J. Mol. Biol, 55, 379-IN4
  32. 10.1021/bi00699a002 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2006, Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 22, 1658
  35. 2002, Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 18, S71
  36. 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
  37. 2013, Oligomerisation status and evolutionary conservation of interfaces of protein structural domain superfamilies, Mol. Biosyst, 9, 1652, 10.1039/c3mb25484d · DOI
  38. Jayashree, S. , Murugavel, P. , Sowdhamini, R. & Srinivasan, N . Interface residues of transient protein-protein complexes have extensive intra-protein interactions apart from inter-protein interactions. Biol. Direct 14, 1 (2019). · DOI
  39. 2017, Specificity and stability of transient protein-protein interactions, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol, 44, 77, 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.12.010 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/prot.22488 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41422-019-0187-y · DOI
  42. 10.1038/s41594-019-0241-y · DOI
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv761 · DOI
  44. 10.1073/pnas.1213295109 · DOI
  45. 10.1074/jbc.M111.230524 · DOI
  46. 10.1021/bi300169x · DOI
  47. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00569 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wang, Y. et al. Specific Eph receptor-cytoplasmic effector signaling mediated by SAM-SAM domain interactions. eLife 7, e35677 (2018). · DOI
  50. 2019, Structural basis of tubulin detyrosination by vasohibins, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 26, 583, 10.1038/s41594-019-0242-x · DOI
  51. 2019, Structural insights into tubulin detyrosination by vasohibins-SVBP complex, Cell Discov, 5, 1
  52. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00338 · DOI
  53. 2017, Insights into the Dynamics and Dissociation Mechanism of a Protein Redox Complex Using Molecular Dynamics, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 57, 2344, 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00421 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/prot.10010 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Parvathy, J., Yazhini, A., Srinivasan, N., & Sowdhamini, R.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • National Centre for Biological Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Sowdhamini, Ramanathan
Venue
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-04-28
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
509-528
ISSN
0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388831384
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology
  • Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Science and Engineering Research Board (JBR/2021/000006)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, interface residues, protein-protein complex, solvent accessible surface area, solvent accessibility, amino acid conservation, binding hot spots
MeSH terms
Protein Binding, Proteins, Solvents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review