The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interfacial residues in protein-protein complexes are in the eyes of the beholder
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26628
Abstract
Interactions between proteins are vital in almost all biological processes. The characterization of protein-protein interactions helps us understand the mechanistic basis of biological processes, thereby enabling the manipulation of proteins for biotechnological and clinical purposes. The interface residues of a protein-protein complex are assumed to have the following two properties: a) they always interact with a residue of a partner protein, which forms the basis for distance-based interface residue identification methods, and b) they are solvent-exposed in the isolated form of the protein and become buried in the complex form, which forms the basis for Accessible Surface Area (ASA)-based methods. The study interrogates this popular assumption by recognizing interface residues in protein-protein complexes through these two methods. The study shows that a few residues are identified uniquely by each method, and the extent of conservation, propensities and their contribution to the stability of protein-protein interaction varies substantially between these residues. The case study analyses showed that interface residues, unique to distance, participate in crucial interactions that hold the proteins together, whereas the interface residues unique to the ASA method have a potential role in the recognition, dynamics and specificity of the complex and can also be a hotspot. Overall, the study recommends applying both distance and ASA methods so that some interface residues missed by either method but crucial to the stability, recognition, dynamics and function of protein-protein complexes are identified in a complementary manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-3233(02)61000-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER, Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma, 54, 5.6.1
- 10.1093/nar/gkx407 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja026939x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. 2021.10.04.463034 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2, Nat. Commun, 13, 1265, 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.10.003 · DOI
- Ahmad, S. & Mizuguchi, K . Partner-Aware Prediction of Interacting Residues in Protein-Protein Complexes from Sequence Data. PLOS ONE 6, e29104 (2011). · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24479 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1234 · DOI
- 2004, A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein–protein interfaces and its implications, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 13, 1043, 10.1110/ps.03484604 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0424 · DOI
- Interaction preferences across protein-protein interfaces of obligatory and non-obligatory components are different | BMC Structural Biology | Full Text. https://bmcstructbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6807-5-15. · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.10461 · DOI
- 10.2174/138920308785132712 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- FoldX web server: an online force field | Nucleic Acids Research | Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/33/suppl_2/W382/2505499. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/protein/15.8.659 · DOI
- 2009, Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 25, 1422
- 10.1093/nar/gkm423 · DOI
- 10.2174/138920309787847590 · DOI
- 2013, An automated approach to network features of protein structure ensembles, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 22, 1399, 10.1002/pro.2333 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw383 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/3.2.95 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/6.8.873 · DOI
- 1971, The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility, J. Mol. Biol, 55, 379-IN4
- 10.1021/bi00699a002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 22, 1658
- 2002, Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 18, S71
- 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
- 2013, Oligomerisation status and evolutionary conservation of interfaces of protein structural domain superfamilies, Mol. Biosyst, 9, 1652, 10.1039/c3mb25484d · DOI
- Jayashree, S. , Murugavel, P. , Sowdhamini, R. & Srinivasan, N . Interface residues of transient protein-protein complexes have extensive intra-protein interactions apart from inter-protein interactions. Biol. Direct 14, 1 (2019). · DOI
- 2017, Specificity and stability of transient protein-protein interactions, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol, 44, 77, 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22488 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41422-019-0187-y · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-019-0241-y · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv761 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1213295109 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M111.230524 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi300169x · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00569 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, Y. et al. Specific Eph receptor-cytoplasmic effector signaling mediated by SAM-SAM domain interactions. eLife 7, e35677 (2018). · DOI
- 2019, Structural basis of tubulin detyrosination by vasohibins, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 26, 583, 10.1038/s41594-019-0242-x · DOI
- 2019, Structural insights into tubulin detyrosination by vasohibins-SVBP complex, Cell Discov, 5, 1
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00338 · DOI
- 2017, Insights into the Dynamics and Dissociation Mechanism of a Protein Redox Complex Using Molecular Dynamics, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 57, 2344, 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00421 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.10010 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Parvathy, J., Yazhini, A., Srinivasan, N., & Sowdhamini, R.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- National Centre for Biological Sciences (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sowdhamini, Ramanathan
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-04-28
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 509-528
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388831384
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology
- Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
- Science and Engineering Research Board (JBR/2021/000006)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, interface residues, protein-protein complex, solvent accessible surface area, solvent accessibility, amino acid conservation, binding hot spots
- MeSH terms
- Protein Binding, Proteins, Solvents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review