PreprintCited by 30vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting T Cell Receptor Functionality against Mutant Epitopes

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100634

Abstract

Cancer cells or pathogens can escape recognition by T cell receptors (TCRs) through mutations of immunogenic epitopes. TCR cross-reactivity, i.e., recognition of multiple epitopes with sequence similarities, can be a factor to counteract such mutational escape. However, cross-reactivity of cell-based immunotherapies may also cause severe side effects when self-antigens are targeted. Therefore, the ability to predict the effect of mutations in the epitope sequence on T cell functionality in silico would greatly benefit the safety and effectiveness of newly-developed immunotherapies and vaccines. We here present “Predicting T cell Epitope-specific Activation against Mutant versions” (P-TEAM), a Random Forest-based model which predicts the effect of point mutations of an epitope on T cell functionality. We first trained and tested P-TEAM on a comprehensive dataset of 36 unique murine TCRs in response to systematic single-amino acid mutations of their target epitope (representing 5.472 unique TCR-epitope interactions). The model was able to classify T cell reactivities, corresponding to in vivo recruitment of T cells, and quantitatively predict T cell functionalities for unobserved single-point mutated altered peptide ligands (APLs), or even unseen TCRs, with consistently high performance. Further, we present an active learning framework to guide experimental design for assessing TCR functionality against novel epitopes, minimizing primary data acquisition costs. Finally, we applied P-TEAM to a novel dataset of 7 human TCRs reactive to the tumor neoantigen VPSVWRSSL. We observed a similarly robust performance for these human TCRs as for the murine TCRs recognizing SIINFEKL, thus providing evidence that our approach is applicable to therapeutically relevant TCRs as well as across species. Overall, P-TEAM provides an effective computational tool to study T cell responses against mutated epitopes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.05.10.540189

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 2018, T cell receptor fingerprinting enables in-depth characterization of the interactions governing recognition of peptide–mhc complexes, Nature biotechnology, 36, 1191, 10.1038/nbt.4303 · DOI
  2. 10.1182/blood-2013-03-490565 · DOI
  3. 2013, Estimating the diversity, completeness, and cross-reactivity of the t cell repertoire, Frontiers in Immunology, 4, 485
  4. 10.1038/nature22383 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature22976 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s00251-017-1023-5 · DOI
  7. 2019, Detection of enriched t cell epitope specificity in full t cell receptor sequence repertoires, Frontiers in Immunology, 10, 2820, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02820 · DOI
  8. 2021, Predicting recognition between t cell receptors and epitopes with tcrgp, PLOS Computational Biology, 17, 1
  9. 2021, Contribution of t cell receptor alpha and beta cdr3, mhc typing, v and j genes to peptide binding prediction, Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 1436
  10. 2021, Titan: T-cell receptor specificity prediction with bimodal attention networks, Bioinformatics, 37, i237, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab294 · DOI
  11. 2021, Current challenges for unseen-epitope tcr interaction prediction and a new perspective derived from image classification, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, bbaa318, 10.1093/bib/bbaa318 · DOI
  12. 2019, VDJdb in 2019: database extension, new analysis infrastructure and a T-cell receptor motif compendium, Nucleic Acids Research, 48, D1057
  13. 2020, Recent insights of t cell receptor-mediated signaling pathways for t cell activation and development, Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 52, 750, 10.1038/s12276-020-0435-8 · DOI
  14. Straub, A. et al. Recruitment of epitope-specific t cell clones with a low-affinity threshold supports efficacy against mutational escape upon re-infection. Immunity (2023). · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41590-020-0628-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0408677102 · DOI
  17. Jeni, L. A. , Cohn, J. F. & De La Torre, F . Facing imbalanced data–recommendations for the use of performance metrics. In 2013 Humaine association conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, 245–251 (IEEE, 2013). · DOI
  18. 2012, Degenerate t-cell recognition of peptides on mhc molecules creates large holes in the t-cell repertoire, PLoS computational biology, 8, e1002412, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002412 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2020, Tcr recognition of peptide–mhc-i: rule makers and breakers, International journal of molecular sciences, 22, 68, 10.3390/ijms22010068 · DOI
  21. 2021, Tcr meta-clonotypes for biomarker discovery with tcrdist3 enabled identification of public, hla-restricted clusters of sars-cov-2 tcrs, Elife, 10, e68605, 10.7554/eLife.68605 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx286 · DOI
  23. Hudson, D. , Fernandes, R. A. , Basham, M. , Ogg, G. & Koohy, H . Can we predict t cell specificity with digital biology and machine learning? Nature Reviews Immunology 1–11 (2023). · DOI
  24. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Molnar, C. et al. General pitfalls of model-agnostic interpretation methods for machine learning models. In xxAI-Beyond Explainable AI: International Workshop, Held in Conjunction with ICML 2020, July 18, 2020, Vienna, Austria, Revised and Extended Papers, 39–68 (Springer, 2022). · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1126/science.1323877 · DOI
  27. Jensen, K. et al. Tcrpmhcmodels: Structural modelling of tcr-pmhc class i complexes. Scientific Reports 9 (2019). · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2479 · DOI
  29. Fout, A. , Byrd, J. , Shariat, B. & Ben-Hur, A . Protein interface prediction using graph convolutional networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
  30. 2021, A survey of deep active learning, ACM computing surveys (CSUR, 54, 1
  31. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1126/scisignal.aac6757 · DOI
  34. 2020, Netmhcpan-4.1 and netmhciipan-4.0: improved predictions of mhc antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of ms mhc eluted ligand data, Nucleic acids research, 48, W449, 10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2016, Unsupervised hla peptidome deconvolution improves ligand prediction accuracy and predicts cooperative effects in peptide–hla interactions, The Journal of Immunology, 197, 2492, 10.4049/jimmunol.1600808 · DOI
  36. 2016, Effects of a single escape mutation on t cell and hiv-1 co-adaptation, Cell reports, 15, 2279, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.017 · DOI
  37. Wu, K. et al. Tcr-bert: learning the grammar of t-cell receptors for flexible antigen-xbinding analyses. bioRxiv 2021–11 (2021). · DOI
  38. 2022, Signatures of recent activation identify a circulating t cell compartment containing tumor-specific antigen receptors with high avidity, Science Immunology, 7, eabm2077, 10.1126/sciimmunol.abm2077 · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061384 · DOI
  40. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-1 · DOI
  41. 2019, Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 9, e1301
  42. 2019, Tcrpmhcmodels: Structural modelling of tcr-pmhc class i complexes, Scientific Reports, 9, 1

Metadata

Authors
Dorigatti, E., Drost, F., Straub, A., Hilgendorf, P., Wagner, K. I., Bischl, B., Busch, D. H., Schober, K., & Schubert, B.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Munich Center for Machine Learning (DE)
  • German Center for Infection Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Schubert, Benjamin
Venue
Cell Genomics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-05-12
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
100634-100634
ISSN
2666-979X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401611485
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cell Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Joachim Herz Stiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (452881907, SFB-TRR 338/1, SFB-TRR 338)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KI2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
T cell receptor, epitope mutations, T-cell epitope prediction, T cell cross-reactivity, cancer immunotherapy, SIINFEKL, human cytomegalovirus, random forest
MeSH terms
Cytomegalovirus, Humans, Mutation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review