The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting T Cell Receptor Functionality against Mutant Epitopes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100634
Abstract
Cancer cells or pathogens can escape recognition by T cell receptors (TCRs) through mutations of immunogenic epitopes. TCR cross-reactivity, i.e., recognition of multiple epitopes with sequence similarities, can be a factor to counteract such mutational escape. However, cross-reactivity of cell-based immunotherapies may also cause severe side effects when self-antigens are targeted. Therefore, the ability to predict the effect of mutations in the epitope sequence on T cell functionality in silico would greatly benefit the safety and effectiveness of newly-developed immunotherapies and vaccines. We here present “Predicting T cell Epitope-specific Activation against Mutant versions” (P-TEAM), a Random Forest-based model which predicts the effect of point mutations of an epitope on T cell functionality. We first trained and tested P-TEAM on a comprehensive dataset of 36 unique murine TCRs in response to systematic single-amino acid mutations of their target epitope (representing 5.472 unique TCR-epitope interactions). The model was able to classify T cell reactivities, corresponding to in vivo recruitment of T cells, and quantitatively predict T cell functionalities for unobserved single-point mutated altered peptide ligands (APLs), or even unseen TCRs, with consistently high performance. Further, we present an active learning framework to guide experimental design for assessing TCR functionality against novel epitopes, minimizing primary data acquisition costs. Finally, we applied P-TEAM to a novel dataset of 7 human TCRs reactive to the tumor neoantigen VPSVWRSSL. We observed a similarly robust performance for these human TCRs as for the murine TCRs recognizing SIINFEKL, thus providing evidence that our approach is applicable to therapeutically relevant TCRs as well as across species. Overall, P-TEAM provides an effective computational tool to study T cell responses against mutated epitopes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 2018, T cell receptor fingerprinting enables in-depth characterization of the interactions governing recognition of peptide–mhc complexes, Nature biotechnology, 36, 1191, 10.1038/nbt.4303 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2013-03-490565 · DOI
- 2013, Estimating the diversity, completeness, and cross-reactivity of the t cell repertoire, Frontiers in Immunology, 4, 485
- 10.1038/nature22383 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature22976 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00251-017-1023-5 · DOI
- 2019, Detection of enriched t cell epitope specificity in full t cell receptor sequence repertoires, Frontiers in Immunology, 10, 2820, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02820 · DOI
- 2021, Predicting recognition between t cell receptors and epitopes with tcrgp, PLOS Computational Biology, 17, 1
- 2021, Contribution of t cell receptor alpha and beta cdr3, mhc typing, v and j genes to peptide binding prediction, Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 1436
- 2021, Titan: T-cell receptor specificity prediction with bimodal attention networks, Bioinformatics, 37, i237, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab294 · DOI
- 2021, Current challenges for unseen-epitope tcr interaction prediction and a new perspective derived from image classification, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, bbaa318, 10.1093/bib/bbaa318 · DOI
- 2019, VDJdb in 2019: database extension, new analysis infrastructure and a T-cell receptor motif compendium, Nucleic Acids Research, 48, D1057
- 2020, Recent insights of t cell receptor-mediated signaling pathways for t cell activation and development, Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 52, 750, 10.1038/s12276-020-0435-8 · DOI
- Straub, A. et al. Recruitment of epitope-specific t cell clones with a low-affinity threshold supports efficacy against mutational escape upon re-infection. Immunity (2023). · DOI
- 10.1038/s41590-020-0628-2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0408677102 · DOI
- Jeni, L. A. , Cohn, J. F. & De La Torre, F . Facing imbalanced data–recommendations for the use of performance metrics. In 2013 Humaine association conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, 245–251 (IEEE, 2013). · DOI
- 2012, Degenerate t-cell recognition of peptides on mhc molecules creates large holes in the t-cell repertoire, PLoS computational biology, 8, e1002412, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002412 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Tcr recognition of peptide–mhc-i: rule makers and breakers, International journal of molecular sciences, 22, 68, 10.3390/ijms22010068 · DOI
- 2021, Tcr meta-clonotypes for biomarker discovery with tcrdist3 enabled identification of public, hla-restricted clusters of sars-cov-2 tcrs, Elife, 10, e68605, 10.7554/eLife.68605 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx286 · DOI
- Hudson, D. , Fernandes, R. A. , Basham, M. , Ogg, G. & Koohy, H . Can we predict t cell specificity with digital biology and machine learning? Nature Reviews Immunology 1–11 (2023). · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- Molnar, C. et al. General pitfalls of model-agnostic interpretation methods for machine learning models. In xxAI-Beyond Explainable AI: International Workshop, Held in Conjunction with ICML 2020, July 18, 2020, Vienna, Austria, Revised and Extended Papers, 39–68 (Springer, 2022). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1323877 · DOI
- Jensen, K. et al. Tcrpmhcmodels: Structural modelling of tcr-pmhc class i complexes. Scientific Reports 9 (2019). · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2479 · DOI
- Fout, A. , Byrd, J. , Shariat, B. & Ben-Hur, A . Protein interface prediction using graph convolutional networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- 2021, A survey of deep active learning, ACM computing surveys (CSUR, 54, 1
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-1 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/scisignal.aac6757 · DOI
- 2020, Netmhcpan-4.1 and netmhciipan-4.0: improved predictions of mhc antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of ms mhc eluted ligand data, Nucleic acids research, 48, W449, 10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Unsupervised hla peptidome deconvolution improves ligand prediction accuracy and predicts cooperative effects in peptide–hla interactions, The Journal of Immunology, 197, 2492, 10.4049/jimmunol.1600808 · DOI
- 2016, Effects of a single escape mutation on t cell and hiv-1 co-adaptation, Cell reports, 15, 2279, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.017 · DOI
- Wu, K. et al. Tcr-bert: learning the grammar of t-cell receptors for flexible antigen-xbinding analyses. bioRxiv 2021–11 (2021). · DOI
- 2022, Signatures of recent activation identify a circulating t cell compartment containing tumor-specific antigen receptors with high avidity, Science Immunology, 7, eabm2077, 10.1126/sciimmunol.abm2077 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0061384 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-5-1 · DOI
- 2019, Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 9, e1301
- 2019, Tcrpmhcmodels: Structural modelling of tcr-pmhc class i complexes, Scientific Reports, 9, 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorigatti, E., Drost, F., Straub, A., Hilgendorf, P., Wagner, K. I., Bischl, B., Busch, D. H., Schober, K., & Schubert, B.
- Affiliations
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (DE)
- German Center for Infection Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schubert, Benjamin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Genomics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-05-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 100634-100634
- ISSN
- 2666-979X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11480844
- OpenAlex
- W4401611485
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cell Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Joachim Herz Stiftung
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (452881907, SFB-TRR 338/1, SFB-TRR 338)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KI2013)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Keywords
- T cell receptor, epitope mutations, T-cell epitope prediction, T cell cross-reactivity, cancer immunotherapy, SIINFEKL, human cytomegalovirus, random forest
- MeSH terms
- Cytomegalovirus, Humans, Mutation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review