PreprintCited by 0RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AutoRNC: an automated modeling program for building atomic models of ribosome-nascent chain complexes

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.str.2024.02.002

Abstract

The interpretation of experimental studies of co-translational protein folding often benefits from the use of computational methods that seek to model the nascent chain and its interactions with the ribosome. Ribosome-nascent chain (RNC) constructs studied experimentally can vary significantly in size and the extent to which they contain secondary and tertiary structure, and building realistic 3D models of them therefore often requires expert knowledge. To circumvent this issue, we describe here AutoRNC, an automated modeling program capable of constructing large numbers of plausible atomic models of RNCs within minutes. AutoRNC takes input from the user specifying any regions of the nascent chain that contain secondary or tertiary structure and attempts to build conformations compatible with those specifications – and with the constraints imposed by the ribosome – by sampling and progressively piecing together dipeptide conformations extracted from the RCSB. We first show that conformations of completely unfolded proteins built by AutoRNC in the absence of the ribosome have radii of gyration that match well with the corresponding experimental data. We then show that AutoRNC can build plausible conformations for a wide range of RNC constructs for which experimental data have already been reported. Since AutoRNC requires only modest computational resources, we anticipate that it will prove to be a useful hypothesis generator for experimental studies, for example, in providing indications of whether designed constructs are likely to be capable of folding, as well as providing useful starting points for downstream atomic or coarse-grained simulations of the conformational dynamics of RNCs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.06.14.544999

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.11.020 · DOI
  2. 10.3390/biom10010097 · DOI
  3. 2019, Nature and Regulation of Protein Folding on the Ribosome, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 44, 914, 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.06.008 · DOI
  4. Rajasekaran, N. and Kaiser, C.M . (2022) Co-Translational Folding of Multi-Domain Proteins. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 9. · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.aad0344 · DOI
  6. 2020, Gradual compaction of the nascent peptide during cotranslational folding on the ribosome, eLife, 9, e60895, 10.7554/eLife.60895 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00293 · DOI
  8. 2015, Cotranslational Protein Folding inside the Ribosome Exit Tunnel, Cell Reports, 12, 1533, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.065 · DOI
  9. 2017, Cotranslational folding of spectrin domains via partially structured states, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 24, 221, 10.1038/nsmb.3355 · DOI
  10. 2018, The shape of the bacterial ribosome exit tunnel affects cotranslational protein folding, eLife, 7, e36326, 10.7554/eLife.36326 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1810523115 · DOI
  12. 2021, The ribosome modulates folding inside the ribosomal exit tunnel, Communications Biology, 4, 523, 10.1038/s42003-021-02055-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.1209740 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1519124113 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.1610272113 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/pro.3189 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.043 · DOI
  18. 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013909 · DOI
  19. 2021, Interactions between nascent proteins and the ribosome surface inhibit co-translational folding, Nature Chemistry, 13, 1214, 10.1038/s41557-021-00796-x · DOI
  20. 2018, Cotranslational protein assembly imposes evolutionary constraints on homomeric proteins, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 25, 279, 10.1038/s41594-018-0029-5 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1810517115 · DOI
  22. 2022, The ribosome stabilizes partially folded intermediates of a nascent multi-domain protein, Nature Chemistry, 14, 1165, 10.1038/s41557-022-01004-0 · DOI
  23. 2006, Molecular simulations of cotranslational protein folding: fragment stabilities, folding cooperativity, and trapping in the ribosome, Plos Computational Biology, 2, 824
  24. 10.1021/ja106530y · DOI
  25. 10.1021/ja302305u · DOI
  26. 2021, Protein sequence-to-structure learning: Is this the end(-to-end revolution)?, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 89, 1770, 10.1002/prot.26235 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 2020, Water as a Good Solvent for Unfolded Proteins: Folding and Collapse are Fundamentally Different, Journal of Molecular Biology, 432, 2882, 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.01.031 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/9329 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.016 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.065 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.aan5774 · DOI
  34. 2019, Non-equilibrium dynamics of a nascent polypeptide during translation suppress its misfolding, Nature Communications, 10, 2709, 10.1038/s41467-019-10647-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.1914366116 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.035 · DOI
  37. 2016, A structural ensemble of a ribosome–nascent chain complex during cotranslational protein folding, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 23, 278, 10.1038/nsmb.3182 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.0903750106 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00293-3 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1038/nature22397 · DOI
  43. 10.7554/eLife.09684 · DOI
  44. 2021, Structural basis of l-tryptophan-dependent inhibition of release factor 2 by the TnaC arrest peptide, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, 9539, 10.1093/nar/gkab665 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.0506078102 · DOI
  46. 10.2144/00286ir01 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/nar/gkn237 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
McDonnell, R. T., & Elcock, A. H.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Elcock, Adrian H.
Venue
Structure
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-06-14
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
621-629.e5
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392302518
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Iowa
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM122466)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
ribosome-nascent chain complex, co-translational folding, dipeptide conformation, conformational sampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review