Cited by 44Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Protein sequence‐to‐structure learning: Is this the end(‐to‐end revolution)?

Open access
Laine, Elodie, Eismann, Stephan, Elofsson, Arne, Grudinin, Sergei·2021·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

The potential of deep learning has been recognized in the protein structure prediction community for some time, and became indisputable after CASP13. In CASP14, deep learning has boosted the field to unanticipated levels reaching near‐experimental accuracy. This success comes from advances transferred from other machine learning areas, as well as methods specifically designed to deal with protein sequences and structures, and their abstractions. Novel emerging approaches include (i) geometric learning, that is, learning on representations such as graphs, three‐dimensional (3D) Voronoi tessellations, and point clouds; (ii) pretrained protein language models leveraging attention; (iii) equivariant architectures preserving the symmetry of 3D space; (iv) use of large meta‐genome databases; (v) combinations of protein representations; and (vi) finally truly end‐to‐end architectures, that is, differentiable models starting from a sequence and returning a 3D structure. Here, we provide an overview and our opinion of the novel deep learning approaches developed in the last 2 years and widely used in CASP14.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.26235

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [27][27] Cohen TS, Welling M. Steerable cnns. arXiv preprint arXiv:161208498 2016;. -
  2. [28][28] Gilmer J, Schoenholz SS, Riley PF, Vinyals O, Dahl GE. Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry. In: Precup D, Teh YW, editors. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research PMLR; 2017. p. 1263-1272. http://proceedings. mlr.press/v /gilmer a.html . -
  3. [33][33] Elofsson A, LeGrand S, Eisenberg D. Local moves, an efficient method for protein folding simulations. Proteins 1995;23:73-82. -
  4. [35][35] Subramaniya SRMV, Terashi G, Jain A, Kagaya Y, Kihara D. Protein contact map denoising using generative adversarial networks. bioRxiv 2020;. -
  5. [38][38] GaoM,ZhouH,SkolnickJ. DESTINI: A deep-learning approach to contact-driven protein structure prediction. Scientific reports 2019;9(1):1-13. -
  6. [40][40] Yan Y, Huang SY. Accurate prediction of residueresidue contacts across homo-oligomeric protein interfaces through deep leaning. bioRxiv 2020;. -
  7. [47][47] Ingraham J, Riesselman A, Sander C, Marks D. Learning protein structure with a differentiable simulator. In: 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019; 2019. . -
  8. [49][49] Kandathil SM, Greener JG, Lau AM, Jones DT. Deep learning-based prediction of protein structure using learned representations of multiple sequence alignments. bioRxiv 2020;. -
  9. [56][56] Adhikari B, Bhattacharya D, Cao R, Cheng J. CONFOLD: Residue-residue contact-guided ab initio protein folding. Proteins 2015 Aug;83(8):1436-1449. -
  10. [55][55] Drori I, Thaker D, Srivatsa A, Jeong D, Wang Y, Nan L, et al. Accurate protein structure prediction by embeddings and deep learning representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:191105531 2019;. -
  11. [96][96] Peters ME, Neumann M, Iyyer M, Gardner M, Clark C, Lee K, et al. Deep contextualized word representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:180205365 2018;. -
  12. [97][97] Radford A, Wu J, Child R, Luan D, Amodei D, Sutskever I. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 2019;1(8):9. -
  13. [110][110] Eismann S, Townshend RJ, Thomas N, Jagota M, Jing B, Dror R. Hierarchical, rotation-equivariant neural networks to predict the structure of protein complexes. arXiv preprint arXiv:200609275 2020;. -
  14. [109][109] Jing B, Eismann S, Suriana P, Townshend RJL, Dror R. Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons. In: International Conference on Learning Representations; 2021. https:// openreview.net/forum?id= YLJDvSx J . -
  15. [132][132] Veličković P, Cucurull G, Casanova A, Romero A, Liò P, Bengio Y. Graph Attention Networks. International Conference on Learning Representations 2018; https://openreview.net/forum?id= rJXMpikCZ . -
  16. [139][139] Kondor R. N-body networks: a covariant hierarchical neural network architecture for learning atomic potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv:180301588 2018;. -
  17. [140][140] Anderson B, Hy TS, Kondor R. Cormorant: Covariant molecular neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:190604015 2019;. -
  18. [142][142] Schütt KT, Kindermans PJ, Sauceda HE, Chmiela S, Tkatchenko A, Müller KR. SchNet: A continuousfilter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions. arXiv:170608566 2017;. -
  19. [145][145] Ritchie DW, Kemp GJ. Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces. Journal of Computational Chemistry 1999;20(4):383-395. -
  20. [158][158] Rosenbaum D, Garnelo M, Zielinski M, Beattie C, Clancy E, Huber A, et al. Inferring a Continuous Distribution of Atom Coordinates from Cryo-EM Images using VAEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:210614108 2021;. -
  21. [170][170] Quadir F, Roy R, Halfmann R, Cheng J. Predicting interchain contacts for homodimeric and homomultimeric protein complexes using multiple sequence alignments of monomers and deep learning. bioRxiv 2020; https://www.biorxiv.org/ content/early/ / / / . . . . -
  22. [172][172] Weinstein EN, Marks DS. A structured observation distribution for generative biological sequence prediction and forecasting. bioRxiv 2021; https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/ / / / . . . . -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laine, E., Eismann, S., Elofsson, A., & Grudinin, S.
Affiliations
  • Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IBPS, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative (LCQB) Paris France
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-22
Volume
89
Issue
12
Pages
1770-1786
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W3160144628
Cited by
44
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐17‐CE12‐0009)
  • National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control
  • Swedish e-Science Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structure prediction, end-to-end architecture, geometric deep learning, graph neural networks, Voronoi tessellation, point clouds, attention mechanism, protein representation, CASP14
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review