PreprintCited by 28Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PepFlow: direct conformational sampling from peptide energy landscapes through hypernetwork-conditioned diffusion

Open access
Abdin, Osama, Kim, Philip M.·2023·Nature Machine Intelligence

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42256-024-00860-4

Abstract

Deep learning approaches have spurred substantial advances in the single-state prediction of biomolecular structures. The function of biomolecules is, however, dependent on the range of conformations they can assume. This is especially true for peptides, a highly flexible class of molecules that are involved in numerous biological processes and are of high interest as therapeutics. Here, we introduce PepFlow, a generalized Boltzmann generator that enables direct all-atom sampling from the allowable conformational space of input peptides. We train the model in a diffusion framework and subsequently use an equivalent flow to perform conformational sampling. To overcome the prohibitive cost of generalized all-atom modelling, we modularize the generation process and integrate a hyper-network to predict sequence-specific network parameters. PepFlow accurately predicts peptide structures and effectively recapitulates experimental peptide ensembles at a fraction of the running time of traditional approaches. PepFlow can additionally be used to sample conformations that satisfy constraints such as macrocyclization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.06.25.546443

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Petsalaki, E. & Russell, R. B . Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19. Protein technologies / Systems biology, 344–350. issn: 0958-1669. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166908000724 (2008). · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012 · DOI
  3. 2022, Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 7, 48, 10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2023, Benchmarking AlphaFold2 on peptide structure prediction, Structure, 31, 111, 10.1016/j.str.2022.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rettie, S. A. et al. Cyclic peptide structure prediction and design using AlphaFold. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/26/2023.02.25.529956.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/26/2023.02.25.529956 (2023).
  6. Johansson-Åkhe, I. & Wallner, B. Improving peptide-protein docking with AlphaFold-Multimer using forced sampling. Frontiers in Bioinformatics 2. issn: 2673-7647. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbinf.2022.959160 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wallner, B . AFsample: Improving Multimer Prediction with AlphaFold using Aggressive Sampling. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/07/2022.12.20.521205.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/07/2022.12.20.521205 (2023).
  8. Wu, R. et al. High-resolution de novo structure prediction from primary sequence. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/22/2022.07.21.500999.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/22/2022.07.21.500999 (2022).
  9. Jing, B. , et al. EigenFold: Generative Protein Structure Prediction with Diffusion Models 2023. arXiv: 2304.02198 [q-bio.BM]. · arXiv
  10. 2023, Direct generation of protein conformational ensembles via machine learning, Nature Communications, 14, 774, 10.1038/s41467-023-36443-x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Nóe, F. , Olsson, S. , Köhler, J. & Wu, H . Boltzmann generators: Sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning. Science 365, eaaw1147. eprint: https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaw1147. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aaw1147 (2019). · DOI
  12. Jing, B. , Corso, G. , Chang, J. , Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer Generation in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Koyejo, S. , et al.) 35 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2022), 24240– 24253. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/994545b2308bbbbc97e3e687ea9e464f-Paper-Conference.pdf.
  13. Song, Y. et al. Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations in International Conference on Learning Representations (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=PxTIG12RRHS.
  14. Satorras, V. G. , Hoogeboom, E. & Welling, M. E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networks in Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T. ) 139 (PMLR, July 2021), 9323–9332. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/satorras21a.html.
  15. Ingraham, J. et al. Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/02/2022.12.01.518682.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/02/2022.12.01.518682 (2022).
  16. 2020, DBAASP v3: database of antimicrobial/cytotoxic activity and structure of peptides as a resource for development of new therapeutics, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D288
  17. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.087 · DOI
  19. 2017, Efficient conformational ensemble generation of protein-bound peptides, Journal of Cheminformatics, 9, 59, 10.1186/s13321-017-0246-7 · DOI
  20. 2021, a major update of the protein ensemble database for intrinsically disordered proteins, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D404, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1021 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kumar, M. et al. The Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource: 2022 release. Nucleic Acids Research 50, D497–D508. issn: 0305-1048. eprint: https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-pdf/50/D1/D497/42058167/gkab975.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab975 (Oct. 2021). · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41573-020-00135-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00156 · DOI
  24. Raveh, B. , London, N. , Zimmerman, L. & Schueler-Furman, O . Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: Simultaneous Folding, Docking and Refinement of Peptides onto Their Receptors. PLOS ONE 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018934 (Apr. 2011). · DOI
  25. 10.1093/nar/gky357 · DOI
  26. Wang, Z. et al. A haplotype of the catalase gene confers an increased risk of essential hypertension in Chinese Han. en. Hum. Mutat. 31, 272–278 (Mar. 2010). · DOI
  27. Grathwohl, W. , Chen, R. T. Q. , Bettencourt, J. , Sutskever, I. & Duvenaud, D. FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Models. CoRR abs/1810.01367. arXiv: 1810.01367. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01367 (2018). · arXiv
  28. Kenton, J. D. M.-W. C. & Toutanova, L. K . Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding in Proceedings of naacL-HLT 1 (2019), 2.
  29. Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is All you Need in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Guyon, I. , et al.) 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
  30. Chang, O. , Flokas, L. & Lipson, H. Principled Weight Initialization for Hypernetworks in International Conference on Learning Representations (2020). https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1lma24tPB.
  31. Satorras, V. G. , Hoogeboom, E. , Fuchs, F. B. , Posner, I. & Welling, M. E(n) Equivariant Normalizing Flows in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Beygelzimer, A. , Dauphin, Y. , Liang, P. & Vaughan, J. W. ) (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=N5hQI_RowVA.
  32. Song, Y. & Ermon, S. Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative Models in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Larochelle, H. , Ranzato, M. , Hadsell, R. , Balcan, M. & Lin, H. ) 33 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2020), 12438–12448. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/92c3b916311a5517d9290576e3ea37ad-Paper.pdf.
  33. 2020, SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1002/PROT.22711 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/ct3010485 · DOI
  36. 2017, OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics, PLOS Computational Biology, 13, 1
  37. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091 · DOI
  41. Ingraham, J. et al. Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/02/2022.12.01.518682.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/02/2022.12.01.518682 (2022).
  42. Song, Y. et al. Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations in International Conference on Learning Representations (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=PxTIG12RRHS.
  43. Köhler, J. , Klein, L. & Noe, F. Equivariant Flows: Exact Likelihood Generative Learning for Symmetric Densities in Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds III, H. D. & Singh, A. ) 119 (PMLR, July 2020), 5361–5370. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/kohler20a.html.
  44. Satorras, V. G. , Hoogeboom, E. , Fuchs, F. B. , Posner, I. & Welling, M. E(n) Equivariant Normalizing Flows in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Beygelzimer, A. , Dauphin, Y. , Liang, P. & Vaughan, J. W. ) (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=N5hQI_RowVA.
  45. Särkkä, S. & Solin, A. Applied Stochastic Differential Equations isbn: 9781316510087. https://books.google.ca/books?id=g5SODwAAQBAJ (Cambridge University Press, 2019). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Kim, Philip M.
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-06-26
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
775-786
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400090810
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (166008_1)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-064)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
peptide conformational sampling, generative models, macrocyclization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review