PreprintCited by 32Epigenetics and DNA MethylationDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Discovery of novel DNA cytosine deaminase activities enables a nondestructive single-enzyme methylation sequencing method for base resolution high-coverage methylome mapping of cell-free and ultra-low input DNA

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.01.027 · Paper page

Abstract

Cytosine deaminases have important uses in the detection of epigenetic modifications and in genome editing. However, the range of applications of deaminases is limited by a small number of well characterized enzymes. To expand the toolkit of deaminases, we developed an in-vitro approach that bypasses a major hurdle with their severe toxicity in expression hosts. We systematically assayed the activity of 175 putative cytosine deaminases on an unprecedented variety of substrates with epigenetically relevant base modifications. We found enzymes with high activity on double- and single-stranded DNA in various sequence contexts including novel CpG-specific deaminases, as well as enzymes without sequence preference. We also report, for the first time, enzymes that do not deaminate modified cytosines. The remarkable diversity of cytosine deaminases opens new avenues for biotechnological and medical applications. Using a newly discovered non-specific, modification-sensitive double-stranded DNA deaminase, we developed a nondestructive single-enzyme 5-methylctyosine sequencing (SEM-seq) method. SEM-seq enables accurate, high-coverage, base-resolution methylome mapping of scarce biological material including clinically relevant cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and single-cell equivalent 10 pg input DNA. Using SEM-seq, we generated highly reproducible base-resolution 5mC maps, accounting for nearly 80% of CpG islands for a low input human cfDNA sample offering valuable information for identifying potential biomarkers for detection of early-stage cancer and other diseases. This streamlined protocol will enable robust, high-throughput, high-coverage epigenome profiling of challenging samples in research and clinical settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.06.29.547047

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1016/j.tig.2021.07.003 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/nar/gkr691 · DOI
  3. Zhang, D. , de Souza, R. F. , Anantharaman, V. , Iyer, L. M. & Aravind, L . Polymorphic toxin systems: Comprehensive characterization of trafficking modes, processing, mechanisms of action, immunity and ecology using comparative genomics. Biol. Direct 7, 18 (2012). · DOI
  4. 2020, Polymorphic Toxins and Their Immunity Proteins: Diversity, Evolution, and Mechanisms of Delivery, Annu. Rev. Microbiol, 74, 497, 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115638 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41586-020-2477-4 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41587-022-01256-8 · DOI
  7. 2021, An interbacterial DNA deaminase toxin directly mutagenizes surviving target populations, eLife, 10, e62967, 10.7554/eLife.62967 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41592-019-0570-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/gr.266551.120 · DOI
  10. 10.1101/gr.265306.120 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nbt.4204 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41587-022-01587-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1827 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/NAR/GKAA913 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2020, MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D570
  18. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.04.021 · DOI
  19. 2022, The Base-Editing Enzyme APOBEC3A Catalyzes Cytosine Deamination in RNA with Low Proficiency and High Selectivity, ACS Chem. Biol, 17, 629, 10.1021/acschembio.1c00919 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/gkx967 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41587-022-01652-0 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkx1081 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.01.001 · DOI
  24. 2021, Detection and relevance of epigenetic markers on ctDNA: recent advances and future outlook, Mol. Oncol, 15, 1683, 10.1002/1878-0261.12978 · DOI
  25. Yin, G. et al. BCORL1 is an independent prognostic marker and contributes to cell migration and invasion in human hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 16, 103 (2016). · DOI
  26. Gillooly, J. F. , Hein, A. & Damiani, R . Nuclear DNA Content Varies with Cell Size across Human Cell Types. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a019091 (2015). · DOI
  27. Mi, L. et al. DddA homolog search and engineering expand sequence compatibility of mitochondrial base editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 874 (2023). · DOI
  28. 10.2139/ssrn.4227259 · DOI
  29. 10.1101/2023.05.21.541555 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2017, IMG/VR: a database of cultured and uncultured DNA Viruses and retroviruses, Nucleic Acids Res, 45, gkw1030
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkaa939 · DOI
  32. 2019, High diversity and rapid spatial turnover of integron gene cassettes in soil, Environ. Microbiol, 21, 1567, 10.1111/1462-2920.14551 · DOI
  33. 2021, Connecting structure to function with the recovery of over 1000 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from activated sludge using long-read sequencing, Nat. Commun, 12, 2009, 10.1038/s41467-021-22203-2 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/S41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1101/2021.06.20.449169 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTZ305 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/molbev/msw046 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.051 · DOI
  40. 2011, Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 27, 1571
  41. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkh103 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/nar/gkw257 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Vaisvila, R., Johnson, S. R., Yan, B., Dai, N., Bourkia, B. M., Chen, M., Corrêa, I. R., Yigit, E., & Sun, Z.
Affiliations
New England Biolabs (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vaisvila, Romualdas
  • Sun, Zhiyi
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-06-30
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
854-866.e7
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392039707
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
cytosine deaminase, DNA methylation, DNA modification detection, cell-free DNA, low-input DNA sequencing
MeSH terms
Epigenome, Cytidine Deaminase, Cytosine, DNA, DNA, Single-Stranded, Cytosine Deaminase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review