Cited by 3,238Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands

Open access
Frommer, M, McDonald, L E, Millar, D S, Collis, C M, Watt, F, Grigg, G W, Molloy, P L, Paul, C L·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The modulation of DNA-protein interactions by methylation of protein-binding sites in DNA and the occurrence in genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, and fragile X syndrome of different methylation patterns in DNA of different chromosomal origin have underlined the need to establish methylation patterns in individual strands of particular genomic sequences. We report a genomic sequencing method that provides positive identification of 5-methylcytosine residues and yields strand-specific sequences of individual molecules in genomic DNA. The method utilizes bisulfite-induced modification of genomic DNA, under conditions whereby cytosine is converted to uracil, but 5-methylcytosine remains nonreactive. The sequence under investigation is then amplified by PCR with two sets of strand-specific primers to yield a pair of fragments, one from each strand, in which all uracil and thymine residues have been amplified as thymine and only 5-methylcytosine residues have been amplified as cytosine. The PCR products can be sequenced directly to provide a strand-specific average sequence for the population of molecules or can be cloned and sequenced to provide methylation maps of single DNA molecules. We tested the method by defining the methylation status within single DNA strands of two closely spaced CpG dinucleotides in the promoter of the human kininogen gene. During the analysis, we encountered in sperm DNA an unusual methylation pattern, which suggests that the high methylation level of single-copy sequences in sperm may be locally modulated by binding of protein factors in germ-line cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1827

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The c.C127 is located in a CpG dinucleotide and can be methylated at the 5 carbon, yielding 5-methylcytosine, and deaminated to produce thymine.

    “The c.C127 is located in the CpG dinucleotide and can be methylated at the 5 carbon, yielding 5-methylcytosine, and deaminated to produce thymine [25].”

    From Identification of a founder haplotype of <i>APOE Kyoto</i> variant in lipoprotein glomerulopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The paper’s method description (p. 1827) discusses 5-methylcytosine and tests methylation at CpG dinucleotides. It does not identify c.C127 or state that 5-methylcytosine deaminates to thymine; its thymine result instead concerns PCR amplification after bisulfite converts unmethylated cytosine to uracil. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Antequera F., Boyes J., Bird A. High levels of de novo methylation and altered chromatin structure at CpG islands in cell lines. Cell. 1990 Aug 10;62(3):503–514. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. Becker P. B., Ruppert S., Schütz G. Genomic footprinting reveals cell type-specific DNA binding of ubiquitous factors. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):435–443. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90639-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. Bell M. V., Hirst M. C., Nakahori Y., MacKinnon R. N., Roche A., Flint T. J., Jacobs P. A., Tommerup N., Tranebjaerg L., Froster-Iskenius U. Physical mapping across the fragile X: hypermethylation and clinical expression of the fragile X syndrome. Cell. 1991 Feb 22;64(4):861–866. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90514-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. Carthew R. W., Chodosh L. A., Sharp P. A. An RNA polymerase II transcription factor binds to an upstream element in the adenovirus major late promoter. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(2 Pt 1):439–448. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90174-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. Chaillet J. R., Vogt T. F., Beier D. R., Leder P. Parental-specific methylation of an imprinted transgene is established during gametogenesis and progressively changes during embryogenesis. Cell. 1991 Jul 12;66(1):77–83. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90140-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. Church G. M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1991–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. Comb M., Goodman H. M. CpG methylation inhibits proenkephalin gene expression and binding of the transcription factor AP-2. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jul 11;18(13):3975–3982. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.13.3975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ghazi H., Magewu A. N., Gonzales F., Jones P. A. Changes in the allelic methylation patterns of c-H-ras-1, insulin and retinoblastoma genes in human development. Dev Suppl. 1990:115–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gregor P. D., Sawadogo M., Roeder R. G. The adenovirus major late transcription factor USF is a member of the helix-loop-helix group of regulatory proteins and binds to DNA as a dimer. Genes Dev. 1990 Oct;4(10):1730–1740. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. Hayatsu H., Wataya Y., Kai K., Iida S. Reaction of sodium bisulfite with uracil, cytosine, and their derivatives. Biochemistry. 1970 Jul 7;9(14):2858–2865. doi: 10.1021/bi00816a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. Kitamura N., Kitagawa H., Fukushima D., Takagaki Y., Miyata T., Nakanishi S. Structural organization of the human kininogen gene and a model for its evolution. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jul 15;260(14):8610–8617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kochanek S., Toth M., Dehmel A., Renz D., Doerfler W. Interindividual concordance of methylation profiles in human genes for tumor necrosis factors alpha and beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(22):8830–8834. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.22.8830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. Monk M. Changes in DNA methylation during mouse embryonic development in relation to X-chromosome activity and imprinting. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 Jan 30;326(1235):299–312. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. Mueller P. R., Wold B. In vivo footprinting of a muscle specific enhancer by ligation mediated PCR. Science. 1989 Nov 10;246(4931):780–786. doi: 10.1126/science.2814500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. Pfeifer G. P., Steigerwald S. D., Mueller P. R., Wold B., Riggs A. D. Genomic sequencing and methylation analysis by ligation mediated PCR. Science. 1989 Nov 10;246(4931):810–813. doi: 10.1126/science.2814502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. Saluz H. P., Jiricny J., Jost J. P. Genomic sequencing reveals a positive correlation between the kinetics of strand-specific DNA demethylation of the overlapping estradiol/glucocorticoid-receptor binding sites and the rate of avian vitellogenin mRNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(19):7167–7171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. Saluz H., Jost J. P. A simple high-resolution procedure to study DNA methylation and in vivo DNA-protein interactions on a single-copy gene level in higher eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2602–2606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. Sawadogo M., Roeder R. G. Interaction of a gene-specific transcription factor with the adenovirus major late promoter upstream of the TATA box region. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):165–175. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. Shapiro R., Braverman B., Louis J. B., Servis R. E. Nucleic acid reactivity and conformation. II. Reaction of cytosine and uracil with sodium bisulfite. J Biol Chem. 1973 Jun 10;248(11):4060–4064. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stein R., Sciaky-Gallili N., Razin A., Cedar H. Pattern of methylation of two genes coding for housekeeping functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(9):2422–2426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.9.2422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. Toth M., Müller U., Doerfler W. Establishment of de novo DNA methylation patterns. Transcription factor binding and deoxycytidine methylation at CpG and non-CpG sequences in an integrated adenovirus promoter. J Mol Biol. 1990 Aug 5;214(3):673–683. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90285-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. Wang R. Y., Gehrke C. W., Ehrlich M. Comparison of bisulfite modification of 5-methyldeoxycytidine and deoxycytidine residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Oct 24;8(20):4777–4790. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.20.4777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. Watt F., Molloy P. L. Cytosine methylation prevents binding to DNA of a HeLa cell transcription factor required for optimal expression of the adenovirus major late promoter. Genes Dev. 1988 Sep;2(9):1136–1143. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.9.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. Woodcock D. M., Crowther P. J., Diver W. P. The majority of methylated deoxycytidines in human DNA are not in the CpG dinucleotide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987 Jun 15;145(2):888–894. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(87)91048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frommer, M., McDonald, L. E., Millar, D. S., Collis, C. M., Watt, F., Grigg, G. W., Molloy, P. L., & Paul, C. L.
Affiliations
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-03
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
1827-1831
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1979273476
Cited by
3,238
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 141 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 137
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
DNA methylation, 5-methylcytosine, strand-specific sequencing, bisulfite modification, CpG, sperm DNA methylation, protein-DNA interactions, genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, fragile X syndrome
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Cytosine, DNA, Humans, Kininogens, Methylation, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Sulfites, Polymerase Chain Reaction, 5-Methylcytosine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review