PreprintCited by 70CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyRNA regulation and disease

High throughput PRIME editing screens identify functional DNA variants in the human genome

Open access
Ren, Xingjie, Yang, Han, Nierenberg, Jovia L., Sun, Yifan, Chen, Jiawen, Beaman, Cooper, Pham, Thu, Nobuhara, Mai +5 more·2023·Molecular Cell

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.021 · Paper page

Abstract

Despite tremendous progress in detecting DNA variants associated with human disease, interpreting their functional impact in a high-throughput and base-pair resolution manner remains challenging. Here, we develop a novel pooled prime editing screen method, PRIME, which can be applied to characterize thousands of coding and non-coding variants in a single experiment with high reproducibility. To showcase its applications, we first identified essential nucleotides for a 716 bp MYC enhancer via PRIME-mediated saturation mutagenesis. Next, we applied PRIME to functionally characterize 1,304 non-coding variants associated with breast cancer and 3,699 variants from ClinVar. We discovered that 103 non-coding variants and 156 variants of uncertain significance are functional via affecting cell fitness. Collectively, we demonstrate PRIME capable of characterizing genetic variants at base-pair resolution and scale, advancing accurate genome annotation for disease risk prediction, diagnosis, and therapeutic target identification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.12.548736

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, X., Yang, H., Nierenberg, J. L., Sun, Y., Chen, J., Beaman, C., Pham, T., Nobuhara, M., Takagi, M. A., Narayan, V., Li, Y., Ziv, E., & Shen, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Yin
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-12
Volume
83
Issue
24
Pages
4633-4645.e9
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390063959
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 5
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od028511-01)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG057497)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA052713)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1HG009402, U01HG011720)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY027789)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
prime editing, non-coding variants, variants of uncertain significance, breast cancer, ClinVar variants, cell fitness, single-base resolution, genome annotation, disease risk prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review