The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Proteins to Ligands: Decoding Deep Learning Methods for Binding Affinity Prediction
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01208 · Paper page
Abstract
Accurate in silico prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity is important in the early stages of drug discovery. Deep learning-based methods exist but have yet to overtake more conventional methods such as giga-docking largely due to their lack of generalisability. To improve generalizability we need to understand what these models learn from input protein and ligand data. We systematically investigated a sequence-based deep learning framework to assess the impact of protein and ligand encodings on predicting binding affinities for commonly used kinase data sets. The role of proteins is studied using convolutional neural network-based encodings obtained from sequences and graph neural network-based encodings enriched with structural information from contact maps. Ligand-based encodings are generated from graph-neural networks. We test different ligand perturbations by randomizing node and edge properties. For proteins we make use of 3 different protein contact generation methods (AlphaFold2, Pconsc4, and ESM-1b) and compare these with a random control. Our investigation shows that protein encodings do not substantially impact the binding predictions, with no statistically significant difference in binding affinity for KIBA in the investigated metrics (concordance index, Pearson’s R Spearman’s Rank, and RMSE). Significant differences are seen for ligand encodings with random ligands and random ligand node properties, suggesting a much bigger reliance on ligand data for the learning tasks. Using different ways to combine protein and ligand encodings, did not show a significant change in performance. TOC Graphic:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Brown, N ., Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery ; Royal Society of Chemistry: 2020; Vol. 75. · DOI
- 2021, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22, 4435, 10.3390/ijms22094435 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm0203783 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/bs.pmch.2021.01.004 · DOI
- 2020, Living J. Mol. Sci, 2, 18378
- 2016, Bioorg. Med. Chem, 24, 4890, 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.07.044 · DOI
- 2022, Living J. Mol. Sci, 4, 1497
- 2023, Nat. Chem. Biol, 19, 712, 10.1038/s41589-022-01234-w · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D520, 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
- 2014, T. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 54, 735, 10.1021/ci400709d · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1990 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, QRB Discov, 3, e14, 10.1017/qrd.2022.12 · DOI
- 2022, Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., 20, 2831, 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.004 · DOI
- 2015, arXiv, 1510, 02855
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty374 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00650 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01306 · DOI
- 2021, Bioinform. Biol. Insights, 15, 1
- Wang, K. ; Zhou, R. ; Tang, J. ; Li, M . Bioinformatics 2023, 39. · DOI
- Jin, Z. ; Wu, T. ; Chen, T. ; Pan, D. ; Wang, X. ; Xie, J. ; Quan, L. ; Lyu, Q . Bioinformatics 2023, 39. · DOI
- 2022, ACS Omega, 7, 2706, 10.1021/acsomega.1c05203 · DOI
- 2021, Bioinformatics, 37, 1140, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa921 · DOI
- 2020, RSC Adv, 10, 20701, 10.1039/D0RA02297G · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Bioinformatics, 34, 821, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593 · DOI
- Öztürk, H. ; Ozkirimli, E. ; Özgür, A. arXiv:1902.04166 2019. · arXiv
- 2019, Bioinformatics, 35, 2677, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1036 · DOI
- Lin, X. ; Zhao, K. ; Xiao, T. ; Quan, Z. ; Wang, Z.-J. ; Yu, P. S. In ECAI, 2020, pp 1–8. · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz111 · DOI
- 2021, Int. J. Mol. Sci, 22, 8993, 10.3390/ijms22168993 · DOI
- 2021, IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform, 19, 718
- 2021, J. Phys. Chem. Lett, 12, 4247, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00867 · DOI
- 2022, J. Med. Chem, 65, 7946, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00487 · DOI
- 10.1101/2020.12.15.422761 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAA895 · DOI
- 2017, J. Cheminformatics, 9, 1, 10.1186/s13321-016-0187-6 · DOI
- Vaswani, A. ; Shazeer, N. ; Parmar, N. ; Uszkoreit, J. ; Jones, L. ; Gomez, A. N. ; Kaiser, L-. ; Polosukhin, I. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2017, 30.
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1099 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cr3002356 · DOI
- 2023, Phys. Biol, 20, 046004, 10.1088/1478-3975/acd543 · DOI
- Ronneberger, O. ; Fischer, P. ; Brox, T. In MICCAI, 2015, pp 234–241. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Biophys. J, 121, 272a
- 10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, J. Cheminformatics, 12, 1, 10.1186/s13321-019-0407-y · DOI
- 2016, arXiv, 1609, 02907
- 2020, BMC Genom, 21, 1, 10.1186/s12864-019-6419-1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0061007 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1072 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-021-04034-6 · DOI
- 2021, Chem. Inf. Model, 62, 240
- 2022, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 18, 6259, 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00752 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorantla, R., Kubincová, A., Weiße, A. Y., & Mey, A. S. J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mey, Antonia S. J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-08-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2496-2507
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11005465
- OpenAlex
- W4388820090
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- UK Research and Innovation (EP/S02431X/1, grant EP/S02431X/1)
- University of Edinburgh
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Keywords
- protein-ligand binding affinity prediction, deep learning, kinase inhibitors, protein contact maps, graph neural networks, convolutional neural networks, AlphaFold2, model generalization, KIBA
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Ligands, Protein Binding, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review