The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compound activity prediction with dose-dependent transcriptomic profiles and deep learning
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01855 · Paper page
Abstract
Predicting compound activity in assays is a long-standing challenge in drug discovery. Computational models based on compound-induced gene-expression signatures from a single profiling assay have shown promise towards predicting compound activity in other, seemingly unrelated, assays. Applications of such models include predicting mechanisms-of-action (MoA) for phenotypic hits, identifying off-target activities, and identifying polypharmacologies. Here, we introduce Transcriptomics-to-Activity Transformer (TAT) models that leverage gene-expression profiles observed over compound treatment at multiple concentrations to predict compound activity in other biochemical or cellular assays. We built TAT models based on gene-expression data from a RASL-Seq assay to predict the activity of 2,692 compounds in 262 dose response assays. We obtained useful models for 51% of the assays as determined through a realistic held-out set. Prospectively, we experimentally validated the activity predictions of a TAT model in a malaria inhibition assay. With a 63% hit rate, TAT successfully identified several sub-micromolar malaria inhibitors. Our results thus demonstrate the potential of transcriptomic responses over compound concentration and the TAT modeling framework as a cost-efficient way to identify the bioactivities of promising compounds across many assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.2174/138161207782794257 · DOI
- 10.1039/c8sc00148k · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, All-Assay-Max2 pQSAR: Activity Predictions as Accurate as Four-Concentration IC50s for 8558 Novartis Assays, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 59, 4450, 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00375 · DOI
- 2020, Using Predicted Bioactivity Profiles to Improve Predictive Modeling, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 60, 2830, 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00250 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00864 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1132939 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, RASL-seq for Massively Parallel and Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression, Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol, 98, 4.13.1
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-017-00136-z · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-06500-x · DOI · Paper page
- Baillif, B. , Wichard, J. , Méndez-Lucio, O. & Rouquié, D . Exploring the Use of Compound-Induced Transcriptomic Data Generated From Cell Lines to Predict Compound Activity Toward Molecular Targets. Front. Chem. 8, (2020). · DOI
- 2023, Predicting compound activity from phenotypic profiles and chemical structures, Nat. Commun, 14, 1967, 10.1038/s41467-023-37570-1 · DOI
- 2022, Integrating cell morphology with gene expression and chemical structure to aid mitochondrial toxicity detection, Commun. Biol, 5, 858, 10.1038/s42003-022-03763-5 · DOI
- 2022, High-dimensional gene expression and morphology profiles of cells across 28,000 genetic and chemical perturbations, Nat. Methods, 19, 1550, 10.1038/s41592-022-01667-0 · DOI
- 2023, Using chemical and biological data to predict drug toxicity, SLAS Discov, 28, 53, 10.1016/j.slasd.2022.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000512 · DOI
- 2020, Gene-signature-derived IC50s/EC50s reflect the potency of causative upstream targets and downstream phenotypes, Sci. Rep, 10, 9670, 10.1038/s41598-020-66533-5 · DOI
- Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is All you Need. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds. Guyon, I. , et al.) vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017).
- 10.18653/v1/N19-1423 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877
- Wei, J. , et al. Chain of Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds. Oh, A. H. , Agarwal, A. , Belgrave, D. & Cho, K. ) (2022).
- Yun, S. , Jeong, M. , Kim, R. , Kang, J. & Kim, H. J. Graph Transformer Networks. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds. Wallach, H. , et al.) vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019).
- Dosovitskiy, A. , et al. An Image is Worth 16×16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. in International Conference on Learning Representations (2021).
- Alayrac, J.-B. , et al. Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds. Oh, A. H. , Agarwal, A. , Belgrave, D. & Cho, K. ) (2022).
- 2019, Molecular Transformer: A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Prediction, ACS Central Science, 5, 1572, 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00576 · DOI
- Madani, A. et al. Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. Nat. Biotechnol. (2023). · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Systematic Chemogenetic Library Assembly, Cell Chem. Biol, 27, 1124, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1101/580654 · DOI
- 2016, Drug Repositioning for Cancer Therapy Based on Large-Scale Drug-Induced Transcriptional Signatures, PLOS ONE, 11, e0150460, 10.1371/journal.pone.0150460 · DOI
- 10.1089/adt.2018.845 · DOI
- 2016, Transcriptional Characterization of Compounds: Lessons Learned from the Public LINCS Data, ASSAY Drug Dev. Technol, 14, 252, 10.1089/adt.2016.715 · DOI
- Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J . Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings (2015).
- 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res, 2, 2825
- 10.1126/science.781840 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.01607-06 · DOI
- 2018, Helios: History and Anatomy of a Successful In-House Enterprise High-Throughput Screening and Profiling Data Analysis System, SLAS Discov. Adv. Sci. Drug Discov, 23, 474, 10.1177/2472555217752140 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Godinez, W. J., Trifonov, V., Fang, B., Kuzu, G., Pei, L., Guiguemde, W. A., Martin, E. J., King, F. J., Jenkins, J. L., & Skewes-Cox, P.
- Corresponding author
- Godinez, William J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-08-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2695-2704
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391389313
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Novartis Repository (Novartis) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- compound activity prediction, dose-dependent gene expression, gene expression signatures, dose-response assay, off-target effects, polypharmacology, mechanism of action, deep learning
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Malaria, Gene Expression Profiling, Drug Discovery, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review