PreprintCited by 24Machine Learning in HealthcareMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Multimodal Data Hybrid Fusion and Natural Language Processing for Clinical Prediction Models

Open access
Ye, Jiancheng, Hai, Jiarui, Song, Jiacheng, Wang, Zidan·2023·medRxiv

Abstract

Objective: To propose a novel approach for enhancing clinical prediction models by combining structured and unstructured data with multimodal data fusion. Methods: We presented a comprehensive framework that integrated multimodal data sources, including textual clinical notes, structured electronic health records (EHRs), and relevant clinical data from National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) datasets. We proposed a novel hybrid fusion method, which incorporated state-of-the-art pre-trained language model, to integrate unstructured clinical text with structured EHR data and other multimodal sources, thereby capturing a more comprehensive representation of patient information. Results: The experimental results demonstrated that the hybrid fusion approach significantly improved the performance of clinical prediction models compared to traditional fusion frameworks and unimodal models that rely solely on structured data or text information alone. The proposed hybrid fusion system with RoBERTa language encoder achieved the best prediction of the Top 1 injury with an accuracy of 75.00% and Top 3 injuries with an accuracy of 93.54%. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential of integrating natural language processing (NLP) techniques with multimodal data fusion for enhancing clinical prediction models’ performances. By leveraging the rich information present in clinical text and combining it with structured EHR data, the proposed approach can improve the accuracy and robustness of predictive models. The approach has the potential to advance clinical decision support systems, enable personalized medicine, and facilitate evidence-based health care practices. Future research can further explore the application of this hybrid fusion approach in real-world clinical settings and investigate its impact on improving patient outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.08.24.23294597

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid fusion integrates unstructured and structured data along with other multimodal sources via a pretrained language model, capturing a more comprehensive patient representation.

    “Hybrid fusion [144] integrates unstructured and structured data along with other multimodal sources via a pretrained language model, capturing a more comprehensive patient representation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ye, J., Hai, J., Song, J., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Ye, Jiancheng
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-08-25
Volume
2024
Pages
191-200
OpenAlex
W4386157633
Cited by
24
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
multimodal fusion, hybrid fusion, clinical prediction model, electronic health records, clinical notes, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, injury prediction, RoBERTa, pre-trained language models, clinical decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review