The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SSDraw: software for generating comparative protein secondary structure diagrams
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4836
Abstract
The program SSDraw generates publication-quality protein secondary structure diagrams from three-dimensional protein structures. To depict relationships between secondary structure and other protein features, diagrams can be colored by conservation score, B-factor, or custom scoring. Diagrams of homologous proteins can be registered according to an input multiple sequence alignment. Linear visualization allows the user to stack registered diagrams, facilitating comparison of secondary structure and other properties among homologous proteins. SSDraw can be used to compare secondary structures of homologous proteins with both conserved and divergent folds. It can also generate one secondary structure diagram from an input protein structure of interest. The source code can be downloaded ( https://github.com/ethanchen1301/SSDraw ) and run locally for rapid structure generation, while a Google Colab notebook allows easy use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2833-4 · DOI
- 2019, A review on the applications and recent advances in environmental DNA (edna) metagenomics, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 18, 389, 10.1007/s11157-019-09501-4 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000667 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- Chowdhury R , Bouatta N , Biswas S , Floristean C , Kharkare A , Roye K , Rochereau C , Ahdritz G , Zhang J , Church GM et al. 2022. Single-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning. Nat Biotechnol. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_26 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Alphafold protein structure database: Massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, D439
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/PRO.3943 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abd8700 · DOI
- 2023, Inhibition of fam46/tent5 activity by bccipα adopting a unique fold, Science Advances, 9, eadf5583, 10.1126/sciadv.adf5583 · DOI
- 2023, Design and characterization of a protein fold switching network, Nat Commun, 14, 431, 10.1038/s41467-023-36065-3 · DOI
- 2023, Reversible switching between two common protein folds in a designed system using only temperature, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 120, e2215418120, 10.1073/pnas.2215418120 · DOI
- 2023, Identification of a covert evolutionary pathway between two protein folds, Nat Commun, 14, 3177, 10.1038/s41467-023-38519-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Biochemistry, Metamorphic proteins. Science, 320, 1725
- 10.1073/pnas.1800168115 · DOI
- 2023, Evolutionary selection of proteins with two folds, Nat Commun, 14, 5478, 10.1038/s41467-023-41237-2 · DOI
- Porter LL . 2023. Fluid protein fold space and its implications. Bioessays.e2300057. · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.340080303 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkg556 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr575 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3258 · DOI
- 2017, Comparative visualization of protein secondary structures, BMC Bioinformatics, 18, 23
- 2021, 2dprots: Database of family-wide protein secondary structure diagrams, Bioinformatics, 37, 4599, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab505 · DOI
- 2022, Overprot: Secondary structure consensus for protein families, Bioinformatics, 38, 3648, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac384 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_6 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr367 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1105 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14258 · DOI
- 2021, Uncovering of cytochrome p450 anatomy by secstrannotator, Sci Rep, 11, 12345, 10.1038/s41598-021-91494-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S71 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.021 · DOI
- Zuber PK , Artsimovitch I , NandyMazumdar M , Liu Z , Nedialkov Y , Schweimer K , Rosch P , Knauer SH . 2018. The universally-conserved transcription factor rfah is recruited to a hairpin structure of the non-template DNA strand. Elife. 7. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.042 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-31532-9 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0700922104 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0906408106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2011.11.018 · DOI
- 2016, Theoretical insights into the biophysics of protein bistability and evolutionary switches, PLoS Comput Biol, 12, e1004960, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004960 · DOI
- 2020, Exploring the sequence fitness landscape of a bridge between two protein folds, PLoS Comput Biol, 16, e1008285, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008285 · DOI
- 2004, Ubiquitin family proteins and their relationship to the proteasome: A structural perspective, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research, 1695, 73, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.10.005 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0403498101 · DOI
- 2017, The nedd8 non-covalent binding region in the smurf hect domain is critical to its ubiquitn ligase function, Sci Rep, 7, 41364, 10.1038/srep41364 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4596 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, E. A., & Porter, L. L.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Porter, Lauren L.
- ORCID
- Porter, Lauren L.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-08-27
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e4836-e4836
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10680343
- OpenAlex
- W4388633862
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (LM202011)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM202011, ZIALM202011)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- protein secondary structure, homologous proteins, conservation scores, Debye-Waller factor, multiple sequence alignment, protein structure visualization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review