PreprintCited by 14Gene Regulatory Network Analysisstochastic dynamics and bifurcationStochastic processes and statistical mechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exact solution of a three-stage model of stochastic gene expression including cell-cycle dynamics

Open access
Wang, Yiling, Yu, Zhenhua, Grima, Ramon, Cao, Zhixing·2023·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Preprint — published as 10.1063/5.0173742

Abstract

The classical three-stage model of stochastic gene expression predicts the statistics of single cell mRNA and protein number fluctuations as a function of the rates of promoter switching, transcription, translation, degradation and dilution. While this model is easily simulated, its analytical solution remains an unsolved problem. Here we modify this model to explicitly include cell-cycle dynamics and then derive an exact solution for the time-dependent joint distribution of mRNA and protein numbers. We show large differences between this model and the classical model which captures cell-cycle effects implicitly via effective first-order dilution reactions. In particular we find that the Fano factor of protein numbers calculated from a population snapshot measurement are underestimated by the classical model whereas the correlation between mRNA and protein can be either over-or underestimated, depending on the timescales of mRNA degradation and promoter switching relative to the mean cell-cycle duration time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.08.29.555255

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1126/science.1070919 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature01546 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1098641 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.026 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1242975 · DOI
  6. 10.7554/eLife.82493 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41586-018-0836-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2017, “Long-term growth data of escherichia coli at a single-cell level, Sci. Data, 4, 1
  10. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.028 · DOI
  11. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132705 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1910888117 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.110057697 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.029 · DOI
  16. 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1027 · DOI
  17. 2009, “Stochasticity of gene products from transcriptional pulsing, Phys. Rev. E, 79, 031911, 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.031911 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.015 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.168302 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.0803850105 · DOI · Paper page
  21. C. Jia and R. Grima , “Coupling gene expression dynamics to cell size dynamics and cell cycle events: Exact and approximate solutions of the extended telegraph model,” Iscience 26 (2023). · DOI
  22. 2021, “Frequency domain analysis of fluctuations of mRNA and protein copy numbers within a cell lineage: theory and experimental validation, Phys. Rev. X, 11, 021032
  23. 2022, “Concentration fluctuations in growing and dividing cells: Insights into the emergence of concentration homeostasis, PLoS Comput. Biol, 18, e1010574, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010574 · DOI
  24. 10.1101/623371 · DOI
  25. 2019, “Exactly solvable model of gene expression in a proliferating bacterial cell population with stochastic protein bursts and protein partitioning, Phys. Rev. E, 99, 042416, 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.042416 · DOI
  26. 2020, “Exact solution of stochastic gene expression models with bursting, cell cycle and replication dynamics, Phys. Rev. E, 101, 032403, 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.032403 · DOI
  27. 2020, “Effects of cell cycle variability on lineage and population measurements of messenger RNA abundance, J. R. Soc. Interface, 17, 20200360, 10.1098/rsif.2020.0360 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1098/rspa.2015.0050 · DOI
  29. 10.1098/rsos.160578 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004972 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00285-011-0433-5. · DOI
  32. 2013, “Exact protein distributions for stochastic models of gene expression using partitioning of poisson processes, Phys. Rev. E, 87, 042720, 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042720 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.plrev.2005.03.003 · DOI
  34. 10.1140/epje/i2015-15001-0 · DOI
  35. N. G. Van Kampen , Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, 1992).
  36. 2018, “Linear mapping approximation of gene regulatory networks with stochastic dynamics, Nat. Commun, 9, 3305, 10.1038/s41467-018-05822-0 · DOI
  37. 2018, “Stochastic hybrid models of gene regulatory networks–a pde approach, Math. Biosci, 305, 170, 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.09.009 · DOI
  38. Y. Pinchover and J. Rubinstein , An introduction to partial differential equations, Vol. 10 (Cambridge university press, 2005). · DOI
  39. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104637 · DOI
  40. 2017, “Approximation and inference methods for stochastic biochemical kinetics—a tutorial review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor, 50, 093001, 10.1088/1751-8121/aa54d9 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90326-0 · DOI
  42. 2019, “Accuracy of parameter estimation for auto-regulatory transcriptional feedback loops from noisy data, J R Soc Interface, 16, 20180967, 10.1098/rsif.2018.0967 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.030 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 2021, “Neural network aided approximation and parameter inference of non-markovian models of gene expression, Nat. Commun, 12, 2618, 10.1038/s41467-021-22919-1 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Yu, Z., Grima, R., & Cao, Z.
Affiliations
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-08-31
Volume
159
Issue
22
ISSN
0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389487553
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2020-327)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62073137)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Keywords
stochastic gene expression, three-phase model, cell cycle kinetics, analytical solution, mRNA-protein correlation, Fano factor, promoter switching, mRNA degradation
MeSH terms
Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Stochastic Processes, Gene Expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review