PreprintCited by 13Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring “dark matter” protein folds using deep learning

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cels.2024.09.006 · Paper page

Abstract

De novo protein design aims to explore uncharted sequence-and structure areas to generate novel proteins that have not been sampled by evolution. One of the main challenges in de novo design involves crafting “designable” structural templates that can guide the sequence search towards adopting the target structures. Here, we present an approach to learn patterns of protein structure based on a convolutional variational autoencoder, dubbed Genesis. We coupled Genesis with trRosetta to design sequences for a set of protein folds and found that Genesis is capable of reconstructing native-like distance-and angle distributions for five native folds and three novel, so-called “dark-matter” folds as a demonstration of generalizability. We used a high-throughput assay to characterize protease resistance of the designs, obtaining encouraging success rates for folded proteins and further biochemically characterized folded designs. The Genesis framework enables the exploration of the protein sequence and fold space within minutes and is not bound to specific protein topologies. Our approach addresses the backbone designability problem, showing that structural patterns in proteins can be efficiently learned by small neural networks and could ultimately contribute to the de novo design of proteins with new functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.08.30.555621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130432 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nature19946 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1261172 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1257452 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.aad8036 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nchembio.1966 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aaf8818 · DOI
  8. England, J. L. & Shakhnovich, E. I . Structural Determinant of Protein Designability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 218101 (2003). · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3341 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.058 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S1093-3263(00)00137-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/science.273.5275.666 · DOI
  13. 2002, Emergence of highly designable protein-backbone conformations in an off-lattice model, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma, 47, 506, 10.1002/prot.10107 · DOI
  14. 1999, Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma, 37, 171, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<171::AID-PROT21>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nature11600 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/wcms.1374 · DOI
  17. Rohl, C. A. , Strauss, C. E. M. , Misura, K. M. S. & Baker, D. Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta. In Methods in Enzymology vol. 383 66–93 (Academic Press, 2004). · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Norn, C. , et al. Protein sequence design by conformational landscape optimization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2017228118 (2021).
  20. 2023, De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network, Protein Sci, 32, e4653, 10.1002/pro.4653 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ingraham, J. , Garg, V. K. , Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T . Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design. Conf. Workshop Neural Inf. Process. Syst. NeurIPS (2019).
  22. Anand, N. et al. Protein sequence design with a learned potential. Nat. Commun. 13, 746 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Norn, C. et al. Protein sequence design by conformational landscape optimization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, (2021).
  25. 2021, De novo protein design by deep network hallucination, Nature, 600, 547, 10.1038/s41586-021-04184-w · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1101/2022.12.01.518682 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.48550/ARXIV.2006.10503 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1089427 · DOI
  31. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1645 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.aan0693 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/s41594-018-0141-6 · DOI
  34. Chidyausiku, T. M. et al. De novo design of immunoglobulin-like domains. Nat. Commun. 13, 5661 (2022). · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.str.2009.07.012 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/nar/gkt1240 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/pro.2610 · DOI
  42. 10.1101/2020.04.26.062612 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/nar/gkab1054 · DOI
  44. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 2019, Statistical Aspects of Wasserstein Distances, Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl, 6, 405, 10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-104938 · DOI
  46. 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/nprot.2006.94 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Harteveld, Z., Van Hall-Beauvais, A., Morozova, I., Southern, J., Goverde, C., Georgeon, S., Rosset, S., Defferrard, M., Loukas, A., Vandergheynst, P., Bronstein, M. M., & Correia, B. E.
Affiliations
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Correia, Bruno E.
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-09-01
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
898-910.e5
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403224796
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • UK Research and Innovation (724228, P/S023283/1)
  • Biltema Foundation
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • National Center of Competence in Research Chemical Biology
  • Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico
  • National Supercomputing Centre Singapore
  • European Research Council
  • H2020 European Research Council (\u2014 716058, 716058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
de novo protein design, convolutional variational autoencoder, protein designability, protease resistance, protein stability
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review