PreprintCited by 2RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

sincFold: end-to-end learning of short- and long-range interactions in RNA secondary structure

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bib/bbae271

Abstract

Motivation: Coding and non-coding RNA molecules participate in many important biological processes. Non-coding RNAs fold into well-defined secondary structures to exert their functions. However, the computational prediction of the secondary structure from a raw RNA sequence is a long-standing unsolved problem, which after decades of almost unchanged performance has now re-emerged thanks to deep learning. Traditional RNA secondary structure prediction algorithms have been mostly based on thermodynamic models and dynamic programming for free energy minimization. More recently deep learning methods have shown competitive performance compared with the classical ones, but still leaving a wide margin for improvement. Results: In this work we present sincFold an end-to-end deep learning approach that predicts the nucleotides contact matrix using only the RNA sequence as input. The model is based on 1D and 2D residual neural networks that can learn short- and long-range interaction patterns. We show that structures can be accurately predicted with minimal physical assumptions. Extensive experiments were conducted on several benchmark datasets, considering sequence homology and cross-family validation. sincFold was compared against classical methods and recent deep learning models, showing that it can outperform state-of-the-art methods. Availability: The source code is available at https://github.com/sinc-lab/sincFold (v0.16) and the web access is provided at https://sinc.unl.edu.ar/web-demo/sincFold Contact: lbugnon@sinc.unl.edu.ar

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.10.10.561771

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 2

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 2018, A max-margin training of RNA secondary structure prediction integrated with the thermodynamic model, Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 16, 1840025, 10.1142/S0219720018400255 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/nar/20.4.819 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/nar/19.21.5901 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/database/baw085 · DOI
  5. 10.1261/rna.2125310 · DOI
  6. 2012, Random search for hyper-parameter optimization, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 281
  7. Bugnon, L. , Edera, A. , Prochetto, S. , and et al. (2022). Secondary structure prediction of long noncoding RNA: review and experimental comparison of existing approaches. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23(4). · DOI
  8. Chen, C.-C. and Chan, Y.-M. (2023). REDfold: accurate RNA secondary structure prediction using residual encoder-decoder network. BMC Bioinformatics, 24(1). · DOI
  9. Chen, X. and Huang, L. (2022). Computational model for ncRNA research. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23(6). · DOI
  10. Chorostecki, U. , Willis, J. , Saus, E. , and et al. (2021). Profiling of RNA Structure at Single-Nucleotide Resolution Using nextPARS, pages 51–62. Springer US, New York, NY. · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature12756 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Flamm, C. , Wielach, J. , Wolfinger, M. , and et al. (2022). Caveats to deep learning approaches to rna secondary structure prediction. Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2. · DOI
  13. 10.1002/bip.360330909 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1074 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/cbic.200300700 · DOI
  17. 2023, Thirteen dubious ways to detect conserved structural rnas, IUBMB Life, 75, 471, 10.1002/iub.2694 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/16.24.11725 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/BF00818163 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/bib/bbad153 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.str.2007.06.003 · DOI
  22. 2011, ViennaRNA package 2.0, Algorithms for Molecular Biology, 6, 1
  23. 10.1093/nar/gku909 · DOI
  24. Magnus, M. , Antczak, M. , Zok, T. , and et al. (2019). Rna-puzzles toolkit: a computational resource of rna 3d structure benchmark datasets, structure manipulation, and evaluation tools. Nucleic Acids Research. · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.0401799101 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.003 · DOI
  27. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2023, Long non-coding RNAs: definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 24, 430, 10.1038/s41580-022-00566-8 · DOI
  29. 10.1261/rna.1700409 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/bi026201s · DOI
  31. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-1 · DOI
  32. Ross, C. J. and Ulitsky, I. (2022). Discovering functional motifs in long noncoding RNAs. WIREs RNA. · DOI
  33. 2023, Rethinking performance measures of rna secondary structure problems, NeuIPs 2023 - Machine Learning in Structural Biology Workshop, 1, 1
  34. 2022, RNA secondary structure prediction using deep learning with thermodynamic integration, Nature Communications, 12, 1
  35. 2023, When will RNA get its AlphaFold moment?, Nucleic Acids Research, 51, 9522, 10.1093/nar/gkad726 · DOI
  36. Schroeder, S. J. and Turner, D. H. (2009). Optical melting measurements of nucleic acid thermodynamics. In Methods in Enzymology, pages 371–387. Elsevier. · DOI
  37. Singh, J. , Hanson, J. , Paliwal, K. , and et al. (2019). RNA secondary structure prediction using an ensemble of two-dimensional deep neural networks and transfer learning. Nature Communications, 10(1). · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab165 · DOI
  39. 10.1261/rna.053694.115 · DOI
  40. 10.1261/rna.074633.120 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac415 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkx815 · DOI
  43. 2009, NNDB: the nearest neighbor parameter database for predicting stability of nucleic acid secondary structure, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D280
  44. 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd001 · DOI
  45. 2019, DMfold: A novel method to predict RNA secondary structure with pseudoknots based on deep learning and improved base pair maximization principle, Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 1
  46. 10.1038/171737a0 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1038/s41573-021-00219-z · DOI · Paper page
  48. Wu, K. E. , Zou, J. Y. , and Chang, H. (2023). Machine learning modeling of RNA structures: methods, challenges and future perspectives. Briefings in Bioinformatics. · DOI
  49. 2019, A new method of RNA secondary structure prediction based on convolutional neural network and dynamic programming, Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 1
  50. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa460 · DOI
  51. Zhang, P. , Wu, W. , Chen, Q. , and et al. (2019b). Non-coding RNAs and their integrated networks. Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics, 16(3). · DOI
  52. 2021, Review of machine learning methods for RNA secondary structure prediction, PLOS Computational Biology, 17, e1009291, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009291 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/nar/9.1.133 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bugnon, L. A., Di Persia, L., Gerard, M., Raad, J., Prochetto, S., Fenoy, E., Chorostecki, U., Ariel, F., Stegmayer, G., & Milone, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES)
Corresponding author
Bugnon, Leandro A.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-10-13
OpenAlex
W4387641578
Cited by
2
References
56
Citations by year
2024: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Conicet (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2018, PICT 2018-3384, CAI+D 2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
RNA secondary structure prediction, deep learning, contact matrices, long-range interactions, short-range interactions, ResNet, non-coding RNA, end-to-end learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review