Machine learning predicts system-wide metabolic flux control in cyanobacteria
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.ymben.2024.02.013 · Paper page
Abstract
Metabolic fluxes and their control mechanisms are fundamental in cellular metabolism, offering insights for the study of biological systems and biotechnological applications. However, quantitative and predictive understanding of controlling biochemical reactions in microbial cell factories, especially at the system level, is limited. In this work, we present ARCTICA, a computational framework that integrates constraint-based modelling with machine learning tools to address this challenge. Using the model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as chassis, we demonstrate that ARCTICA effectively simulates global-scale metabolic flux control. Key findings are that (i) the photosynthetic bioproduction is mainly governed by enzymes from the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, rather than by those involve in the biosynthesis of the end-product, (ii) the catalytic capacity of the CBB cycle limits the photosynthetic activity and downstream pathways and (iii) ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) is a major, but not the most, limiting step in the CBB cycle. Predicted metabolic reactions qualitatively align with prior experimental observations, validating our modelling approach. ARCTICA serves as a valuable pipeline for understanding cellular physiology and predicting rate-limiting steps in genome-scale metabolic networks, providing guidance for bioengineering of cyanobacteria. Highlights: A workflow for flux control analysis in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Machine learning with features derived from genome-scale metabolic modelling. Identification of potential key reactions for metabolic adaptations and cell bioengineering.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction
Li, F., Yuan, L., Lu, H., Li, G., Chen, Y., Engqvist, M. K. M., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Engineering highly productive cyanobacteria towards carbon negative emissions technologies
Victoria, A. J., Astbury, M. J., & McCormick, A. J. (2024) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103141 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kugler, A., & Stensjö, K.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Stensjö, Karin
- ORCID
- Stensjö, Karin
- Venue
- Metabolic Engineering
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-10-20
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 171-182
- ISSN
- 1096-7176 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392015251
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Metabolic Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Skogs- och Jordbrukets Forskningsråd (2021-01669)
- Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2022–06725, 2021-01669)
- Vetenskapsrådet (2022-06725)
- Energimyndigheten (44728-1, SNIC 2022/22-1100)
- Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- metabolic flux control, cyanobacteria, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, constraint-based modeling, machine learning, Calvin cycle, Rubisco, rate-determining step, genome-scale metabolic networks
- MeSH terms
- Photosynthesis, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Synechocystis, Metabolic Networks and Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review