PreprintCited by 31Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Machine learning predicts system-wide metabolic flux control in cyanobacteria

Open access
Kugler, Amit, Stensjö, Karin·2023·Metabolic Engineering

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.ymben.2024.02.013 · Paper page

Abstract

Metabolic fluxes and their control mechanisms are fundamental in cellular metabolism, offering insights for the study of biological systems and biotechnological applications. However, quantitative and predictive understanding of controlling biochemical reactions in microbial cell factories, especially at the system level, is limited. In this work, we present ARCTICA, a computational framework that integrates constraint-based modelling with machine learning tools to address this challenge. Using the model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as chassis, we demonstrate that ARCTICA effectively simulates global-scale metabolic flux control. Key findings are that (i) the photosynthetic bioproduction is mainly governed by enzymes from the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, rather than by those involve in the biosynthesis of the end-product, (ii) the catalytic capacity of the CBB cycle limits the photosynthetic activity and downstream pathways and (iii) ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) is a major, but not the most, limiting step in the CBB cycle. Predicted metabolic reactions qualitatively align with prior experimental observations, validating our modelling approach. ARCTICA serves as a valuable pipeline for understanding cellular physiology and predicting rate-limiting steps in genome-scale metabolic networks, providing guidance for bioengineering of cyanobacteria. Highlights: A workflow for flux control analysis in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Machine learning with features derived from genome-scale metabolic modelling. Identification of potential key reactions for metabolic adaptations and cell bioengineering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.10.18.562898

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kugler, A., & Stensjö, K.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Stensjö, Karin
Venue
Metabolic Engineering
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-10-20
Volume
82
Pages
171-182
ISSN
1096-7176 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392015251
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Metabolic Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Skogs- och Jordbrukets Forskningsråd (2021-01669)
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2022–06725, 2021-01669)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2022-06725)
  • Energimyndigheten (44728-1, SNIC 2022/22-1100)
  • Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
metabolic flux control, cyanobacteria, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, constraint-based modeling, machine learning, Calvin cycle, Rubisco, rate-determining step, genome-scale metabolic networks
MeSH terms
Photosynthesis, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Synechocystis, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review