The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RNAdvisor: a comprehensive benchmarking tool for the measure and prediction of RNA structural model quality
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bib/bbae064 · Paper page
Abstract
RNA is a complex macromolecule that plays central roles in the cell. While it is well-known that its structure is directly related to its functions, understanding and predicting RNA structures is challenging. Assessing the real or predictive quality of a structure is also at stake with the complex 3D possible conformations of RNAs. Metrics have been developed to measure model quality while scoring functions aim at assigning quality to guide the discrimination of structures without a known and solved reference. Throughout the years, many metrics and scoring functions have been developed, and no unique assessment is used nowadays. Each developed assessment method has its specificity and might be complementary to understanding structure quality. Therefore, to evaluate RNA 3D structure predictions, it would be important to calculate different metrics and/or scoring functions. For this purpose, we developed RNAdvisor, a comprehensive automated software that integrates and enhances the accessibility of existing metrics and scoring functions. In this paper, we present our RNAdvisor tool, as well as state-of-the-art existing metrics, scoring functions and a set of benchmarks we conducted for evaluating them. Source code is freely available on the EvryRNA platform: https://evryrna.ibisc.univ-evry.fr .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1073/pnas.0703836104 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2020.05.011 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4881424 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00200 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv221 · DOI
- Zeming Lin , Halil Akin , Roshan Rao , Brian Hie , Zhongkai Zhu , Wenting Lu , Nikita Smetanin , Allan dos Santos Costa , Maryam Fazel-Zarandi , Tom Sercu , Sal Candido , et al. Language models of protein sequences at the scale of evolution enable accurate structure prediction. bioRxiv, 2022.
- 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1261/rna.1700409 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10100-013-0296-5 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.1270809 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1479 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01148 · DOI
- Dong Zhang , Shi jie Chen , and Ruhong Zhou . Modeling Noncanonical RNA Base Pairs by a Coarse-Grained IsRNA2 Model. The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2021. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkad122 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr093 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.11.016 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr093 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gku972 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkm216 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<22::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24172 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1261/rna.1837410 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24121 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1479 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.1087 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21279 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.0217002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1110/ps.062416606 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0015386 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.069872.118 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv141 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006514 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abe5650 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac372 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.031054.111 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.NND.0000320699.47006.a3 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gks339 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms20174116 · DOI
- Alexandre Lacoste , Alexandra Luccioni , Victor Schmidt , and Thomas Dandres . Quantifying the carbon emissions of machine learning. In Climate Change workshop, NeurIPS 2019, 2019.
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernard, C., Postic, G., Ghannay, S., & Tahi, F.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Tahi, Fariza
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-11-16
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- bbae064
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10939302
- OpenAlex
- W4392393183
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0003, ANR-11-LABX-0045, ANR-17-CONV-0003, ANR-20-THIA-0013, ANR-17)
- Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif (AD011014250)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- RNA structure prediction, model quality assessment, scoring functions, benchmarking, RNA tertiary structure
- MeSH terms
- Models, Structural, RNA, Software, Benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review