The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast and scalable querying of eukaryotic linear motifs with gget elm
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae095
Abstract
Motivation: Eukaryotic linear motifs (ELMs), or Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs), are protein interaction modules that play an essential role in cellular processes and signaling networks and are often involved in diseases like cancer. The ELM database is a collection of manually curated motif knowledge from scientific papers. It has become a crucial resource for cataloging motif biology and recognizing candidate ELMs in novel amino acid sequences. Users can search amino acid sequences or UniProt IDs on the ELM resource web interface. However, as with many web services, there are limitations in the swift processing of large-scale queries through the ELM web interface or API calls, and, therefore, integration into protein function analysis pipelines is limited. Results: To allow swift, large-scale motif analyses on protein sequences using ELMs curated on the ELM database, we have developed a Python and command line tool, gget elm , which relies on local computations for efficiently finding candidate ELMs in user-submitted amino acid sequences and UniProt identifiers. gget elm increases accessibility to the information stored in the ELM database and allows scalable searches for motif-mediated interaction sites in the amino acid sequences. Availability and implementation: The manual and source code are available at https://github.com/pachterlab/gget .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Toward a unified theory of high-energy metaphysics: Silly string theory, Knit Forecast Int, 5, 1
- 10.1186/1471-2105-9-229 · DOI
- 10.1039/c1mb05231d · DOI
- 2015, ELM 2016—data update and new functionality of the eukaryotic linear motif resource, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, D294
- 2011, ELM—the database of eukaryotic linear motifs, Nucleic Acids Res, 40, D242
- Fasano, C. et al. (2022) Short Linear Motifs in Colorectal Cancer Interactome and Tumorigenesis. Cells, 11. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1077 · DOI
- 2018, PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2), Atlas Genet. Cytogenet. Oncol. Haematol, 22, 484
- 2021, Large scale discovery of coronavirus-host factor protein interaction motifs reveals SARS-CoV-2 specific mechanisms and vulnerabilities, Nat. Commun, 12, 6761, 10.1038/s41467-021-26498-z · DOI
- Kumar, M. et al. (2023) ELM-the Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource-2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkzl030 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab975 · DOI
- Lee, C.Y. et al. (2023) Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation. bioRxiv, 2023.08.07.552219. · DOI · Paper page
- Luebbert, L. and Pachter, L. (2022) Efficient querying of genomic reference databases with gget. bioRxiv. · DOI
- Mészáros, B. et al. (2017) Degrons in cancer. Sci. Signal., 10. · DOI
- 10.1126/scisignal.abd0334 · DOI
- 10.1038/embor.2009.126 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkg545 · DOI
- 2023, SLiM-binding pockets: an attractive target for broad-spectrum antivirals, Trends Biochem. Sci, 48, 420, 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/C4MB00290C · DOI
- 10.1021/cr400585q · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Luebbert, L., Hoang, C., Kumar, M., & Pachter, L.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pachter, Lior
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-11-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10927331
- OpenAlex
- W4391971691
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- California Institute of Technology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- short linear motifs, protein interaction sites, motif search
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Software, Amino Acid Motifs, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review