PreprintCited by 1Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fast and scalable querying of eukaryotic linear motifs with gget elm

Open access
Luebbert, Laura, Hoang, Chi, Kumar, Manjeet, Pachter, Lior·2023·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae095

Abstract

Motivation: Eukaryotic linear motifs (ELMs), or Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs), are protein interaction modules that play an essential role in cellular processes and signaling networks and are often involved in diseases like cancer. The ELM database is a collection of manually curated motif knowledge from scientific papers. It has become a crucial resource for cataloging motif biology and recognizing candidate ELMs in novel amino acid sequences. Users can search amino acid sequences or UniProt IDs on the ELM resource web interface. However, as with many web services, there are limitations in the swift processing of large-scale queries through the ELM web interface or API calls, and, therefore, integration into protein function analysis pipelines is limited. Results: To allow swift, large-scale motif analyses on protein sequences using ELMs curated on the ELM database, we have developed a Python and command line tool, gget elm , which relies on local computations for efficiently finding candidate ELMs in user-submitted amino acid sequences and UniProt identifiers. gget elm increases accessibility to the information stored in the ELM database and allows scalable searches for motif-mediated interaction sites in the amino acid sequences. Availability and implementation: The manual and source code are available at https://github.com/pachterlab/gget .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.11.15.567056

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2008, Toward a unified theory of high-energy metaphysics: Silly string theory, Knit Forecast Int, 5, 1
  4. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-229 · DOI
  5. 10.1039/c1mb05231d · DOI
  6. 2015, ELM 2016—data update and new functionality of the eukaryotic linear motif resource, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, D294
  7. 2011, ELM—the database of eukaryotic linear motifs, Nucleic Acids Res, 40, D242
  8. Fasano, C. et al. (2022) Short Linear Motifs in Colorectal Cancer Interactome and Tumorigenesis. Cells, 11. · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/gkx1077 · DOI
  10. 2018, PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2), Atlas Genet. Cytogenet. Oncol. Haematol, 22, 484
  11. 2021, Large scale discovery of coronavirus-host factor protein interaction motifs reveals SARS-CoV-2 specific mechanisms and vulnerabilities, Nat. Commun, 12, 6761, 10.1038/s41467-021-26498-z · DOI
  12. Kumar, M. et al. (2023) ELM-the Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource-2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res. · DOI
  13. 10.1093/nar/gkzl030 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/nar/gkab975 · DOI
  15. Lee, C.Y. et al. (2023) Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation. bioRxiv, 2023.08.07.552219. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Luebbert, L. and Pachter, L. (2022) Efficient querying of genomic reference databases with gget. bioRxiv. · DOI
  17. Mészáros, B. et al. (2017) Degrons in cancer. Sci. Signal., 10. · DOI
  18. 10.1126/scisignal.abd0334 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/embor.2009.126 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/gkg545 · DOI
  21. 2023, SLiM-binding pockets: an attractive target for broad-spectrum antivirals, Trends Biochem. Sci, 48, 420, 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.12.004 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1039/C4MB00290C · DOI
  24. 10.1021/cr400585q · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Luebbert, L., Hoang, C., Kumar, M., & Pachter, L.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Pachter, Lior
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-11-17
Volume
40
Issue
3
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391971691
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
California Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
short linear motifs, protein interaction sites, motif search
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Software, Amino Acid Motifs, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review