The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ThermoLink: Bridging Disulfide Bond and Enzyme Thermostability through Database Construction and Machine Learning Prediction
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.5097 · Paper page
Abstract
Disulfide bonds (SS bonds), covalently formed by sulfur atoms in cysteine residues, play a crucial role in protein folding and structure stability. Due to their significance, artificial disulfide bonds are often introduced to enhance the thermostability of proteins. Although an increasing number of tools can assist with this task, significant amounts of time and resources were often wasted due to inadequate consideration. To enhance the accuracy and efficiency of designing disulfide bonds for protein thermostability improvement, we first collected disulfide-bond data with protein thermostability data from extensive literature sources. Then, various sequence- and structure-based features were extracted, and machine learning models were constructed to predict whether a disulfide bond could improve protein thermostability. Among all models, the neighborhood context model using the Adaboost-DT algorithm performs the best, and the AUC-ROC score and accuracy are 0.773 and 0.714, respectively. Alongside this, we also found that AlphaFold2 exhibits a high superiority in predicting disulfide bonds, and the coevolutionary relationship between residue pairs, to some extent, could also guide artificial disulfide-bond design. The SS-bond data has been integrated into an online server, named ThermoLink, available at guolab.mpu.edu.mo/thermoLink.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, R., Ye, Y., Xin, M., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Li, W., Wei, Y., Zheng, L., & Guo, J.
- Affiliations
- Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
- Shandong University (CN)
- Xiamen Innovax Biotech Co., Ltd. (China) (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Liangzhen
- Guo, Jingjing
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-12-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e5097-e5097
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11325166
- OpenAlex
- W4401616221
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62272449)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFA0915500)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
- Keywords
- protein thermal stability, disulfide bond prediction, AlphaFold2
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Disulfides, Enzyme Stability, Models, Molecular, Protein Folding, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review