The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bottom-up parameterization of enzyme rate constants: Reconciling inconsistent data
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.mec.2024.e00234 · Paper page
Abstract
Kinetic models of enzymes have a long history of use for studying complex metabolic systems and designing production strains. Given the availability of enzyme kinetic data from historical experiments and machine learning estimation tools, a straightforward modeling approach is to assemble kinetic data enzyme by enzyme until a desired scale is reached. However, this type of ‘bottom up’ parameterization of kinetic models has been difficult due to a number of issues including gaps in kinetic parameters, the complexity of enzyme mechanisms, inconsistencies between parameters obtained from different sources, and in vitro-in vivo differences. Here, we present a computational workflow for the robust estimation of kinetic parameters for detailed mass action enzyme models while taking into account parameter uncertainty. The resulting software package, termed MASSef (the Mass Action Stoichiometry Simulation Enzyme Fitting package), can handle standard ‘macroscopic’ kinetic parameters, including K m , k cat , K i , K eq , and n h , as well as diverse reaction mechanisms defined in terms of mass action reactions and ‘microscopic’ rate constants. We provide three enzyme case studies demonstrating that this approach can identify and reconcile inconsistent data either within in vitro experiments or between in vitro and in vivo enzyme function. The code and case studies are provided in the MASSef package built on top of the MASS Toolbox in Mathematica. This work builds on the legacy of knowledge on kinetic behavior of enzymes by enabling robust parameterization of enzyme kinetic models at scale utilizing the abundance of historical literature data and machine learning parameter estimates. Author Summary: Detailed kinetic models of metabolism offer the promise of enabling new predictions of metabolic behavior and prospective design of metabolic function. However, parameterizing such models remains a substantial challenge. Historically, the kinetics of many enzymes have been measured using in vitro assays, but integrating this data into consistent large-scale models and filling gaps in available data has been a primary difficulty. Here, we provide an algorithmic approach to parameterize enzyme kinetic models using diverse enzyme kinetic data. The approach reconciles inconsistent data and addresses the issue of gaps in available data implicitly through sampling alternative parameter sets. We provide a number of case studies demonstrating the approach on different enzymes. This work empowers the use of the large amount of historical and machine learning-estimated enzyme data and will aid in the construction of biochemically-accurate models of metabolism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction
Li, F., Yuan, L., Lu, H., Li, G., Chen, Y., Engqvist, M. K. M., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z · Cited by 466
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 2017, Metabolic regulation is sufficient for global and robust coordination of glucose uptake, catabolism, energy production and growth in Escherichia coli, PLoS Comput Biol, 13, e1005396, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005396 · DOI
- 10.1002/biot.201400522 · DOI
- 2019, From Escherichia coli mutant 13C labeling data to a core kinetic model: A kinetic model parameterization pipeline, PLoS Comput Biol, 15, e1007319, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007319 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.2489 · DOI
- 2016, Identification of metabolic engineering targets for the enhancement of 1,4-butanediol production in recombinant E, coli using large-scale kinetic models. Metab Eng, 35, 148
- 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.COPBIO.2015.08.011 · DOI
- 2013, Parameter identification of in vivo kinetic models: limitations and challenges, Biotechnol J, 8, 768, 10.1002/biot.201300105 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Shepelin D , Machado D , Nielsen LK , Herrgård MJ . Benchmarking kinetic models of Escherichia coli metabolism [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2020 [cited 2023 Oct 28]. p. 2020.01.16.908921. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.16.908921.full · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004195 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.108.135442 · DOI
- 10.1002/bit.10288 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms13806 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.09.064 · DOI
- 2022, Bayesian parameter estimation for dynamical models in systems biology, PLoS Comput Biol, 18, e1010651, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010651 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt023 · DOI
- 2017, Parameter identifiability analysis and visualization in large-scale kinetic models of biosystems, BMC Syst Biol, 11, 54, 10.1186/s12918-017-0428-y · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485 · DOI · Paper page
- 2015, Robust and efficient parameter estimation in dynamic models of biological systems, BMC Syst Biol, 9, 74, 10.1186/s12918-015-0219-2 · DOI
- 2007, Dynamic simulation of an in vitro multi-enzyme system, FEBS Lett, 581, 413, 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.12.049 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01527.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/abio.1996.0238 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-020-3513-y · DOI
- 10.1038/srep41926 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw952 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12918-014-0085-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-07652-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp004 · DOI
- 2014, The importance and challenges of in vivo-like enzyme kinetics. Perspectives in Science, 1, 126
- 10.1111/febs.12007 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07524.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1514240113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nchembio.186 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Reconstructing Kinetic Models for Dynamical Studies of Metabolism using Generative Adversarial Networks, Nature Machine Intelligence, 4, 710, 10.1038/s42256-022-00519-y · DOI
- 1963, The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two or more substrates or products: I. Nomenclature and rate equations, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Specialized Section on Enzymological Subjects, 67, 104
- 10.1021/ja01104a045 · DOI
- Hochachka PW . Chapter 12 - Temperature: the ectothermy option. In: Hochachka PW , Mommsen TP , editors. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes. Elsevier; 1991. p. 313–22. · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M117.804914 · DOI
- 10.1016/0009-8981(95)06060-Q · DOI
- 1964, On the Mechanism of the Effect of Ionic Strength on Crystalline Aldolase Activity, J Biol Chem, 239, 4154, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)91148-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.04.030 · DOI
- 10.1016/0076-6879(79)63011-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.025 · DOI
- 10.1021/j150560a005 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008208 · DOI
- 1999, Engineered glycolytic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase binds the anti conformation of NAD+ nicotinamide but does not experience A-specific hydride transfer, Arch Biochem Biophys, 364, 219, 10.1006/abbi.1999.1116 · DOI
- 1980, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from human erythrocyte membranes. Kinetic mechanism and competitive substrate inhibition by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, Arch Biochem Biophys, 205, 136, 10.1016/0003-9861(80)90092-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr874 · DOI
- 2015, Pseudo-transition Analysis Identifies the Key Regulators of Dynamic Metabolic Adaptations from Steady-State Data, cels, 1, 270
- 10.1038/nbt.3418 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.07.028 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zielinski, D. C., Matos, M. R. A., de Bree, J. E., Glass, K., Sonnenschein, N., & Palsson, B. O.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Palsson, Bernhard O.
- Venue
- Metabolic Engineering Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-12-07
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- e00234-e00234
- ISSN
- 2214-0301 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11070925
- OpenAlex
- W4395031525
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Metabolic Engineering Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk (NNF10CC1016517, NNF20CC0035580)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF20CC0035580, NNF10CC1016517)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- parameter uncertainty, in vitro-in vivo discrepancy, enzyme mechanism, Michaelis constant, Michaelis-Menten kinetics, enzyme inhibition, equilibrium constants, metabolic engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review