PreprintCited by 2Evolution and Genetic DynamicsFungal and yeast genetics researchChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Hybrid adaptation is hampered by Haldane’s sieve

Open access
Bautista, Carla, Gagnon-Arsenault, Isabelle, Utrobina, Mariia, Fijarczyk, Anna, Bendixsen, Devin P., Stelkens, Rike, Landry, Christian R.·2023·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-54105-4 · Paper page

Abstract

Hybrids between species exhibit plastic genomic architectures that foster phenotypic diversity. Their genomic instability also incurs costs, potentially limiting adaptation. When challenged to evolve in an environment containing a UV mimetic drug, yeast hybrids have reduced adaptation rates compared to parents. We hypothesized that this reduction could result from a faster accumulation of genomic changes, but we found no such association. Alternatively, we proposed that hybrids might lack access to adaptive mutations occurring in the parents, yet, we identified mutations in the same genes ( PDR1 and YRR1 ), suggesting similar molecular adaptation mechanisms. However, mutations in these genes tended to be homozygous in the parents but heterozygous in the hybrids. We hypothesized that a lower rate of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in hybrids could limit fitness gain. Using genome editing, we demonstrated that mutations display incomplete dominance, requiring homozygosity to show full impact and to circumvent Haldane’s sieve, which favors the fixation of dominant mutations. We used frozen ‘fossils’ to track genotype frequency dynamics and confirmed that LOH occurs at a slower pace in hybrids than in parents. Together, these findings show that Haldane’s sieve slows down adaptation in hybrids, revealing an intrinsic constraint of hybrid genomic architecture that can limit the role of hybridization in adaptive evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.15.571924

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 152 · Cited by 2

Authors
Bautista, C., Gagnon-Arsenault, I., Utrobina, M., Fijarczyk, A., Bendixsen, D. P., Stelkens, R., & Landry, C. R.
Affiliations
  • PROTEO (CA)
  • National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (UA)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Bautista, Carla
  • Landry, Christian R.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-16
OpenAlex
W4389849063
Cited by
2
References
152
Citations by year
2025: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
hybridization, hybrid adaptation, loss of heterozygosity, incomplete dominance, PDR1, genomic instability, yeast hybrids, adaptive evolution, genome editing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review