Hybrid adaptation is hampered by Haldane’s sieve
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-54105-4 · Paper page
Abstract
Hybrids between species exhibit plastic genomic architectures that foster phenotypic diversity. Their genomic instability also incurs costs, potentially limiting adaptation. When challenged to evolve in an environment containing a UV mimetic drug, yeast hybrids have reduced adaptation rates compared to parents. We hypothesized that this reduction could result from a faster accumulation of genomic changes, but we found no such association. Alternatively, we proposed that hybrids might lack access to adaptive mutations occurring in the parents, yet, we identified mutations in the same genes ( PDR1 and YRR1 ), suggesting similar molecular adaptation mechanisms. However, mutations in these genes tended to be homozygous in the parents but heterozygous in the hybrids. We hypothesized that a lower rate of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in hybrids could limit fitness gain. Using genome editing, we demonstrated that mutations display incomplete dominance, requiring homozygosity to show full impact and to circumvent Haldane’s sieve, which favors the fixation of dominant mutations. We used frozen ‘fossils’ to track genotype frequency dynamics and confirmed that LOH occurs at a slower pace in hybrids than in parents. Together, these findings show that Haldane’s sieve slows down adaptation in hybrids, revealing an intrinsic constraint of hybrid genomic architecture that can limit the role of hybridization in adaptive evolution.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 152 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Bautista, C., Gagnon-Arsenault, I., Utrobina, M., Fijarczyk, A., Bendixsen, D. P., Stelkens, R., & Landry, C. R.
- Affiliations
- PROTEO (CA)
- National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (UA)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Bautista, Carla
- Landry, Christian R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-12-16
- OpenAlex
- W4389849063
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 152
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- hybridization, hybrid adaptation, loss of heterozygosity, incomplete dominance, PDR1, genomic instability, yeast hybrids, adaptive evolution, genome editing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review