PreprintCited by 13Protein Structure and DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One million years of solitude: the rapid evolution of de novo protein structure and complex

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/gbe/evae107

Abstract

Recent studies have established that de novo genes, evolving from non-coding sequences, enhance protein diversity through a stepwise process. However, the pattern and rate of their structural evolution over time remain unclear. Here, we addressed these issues within a short evolutionary timeframe (∼1 million years for 97% of rice de novo genes). We found that de novo genes evolve faster than gene duplicates in the intrinsic disordered regions (IDRs, such as random coils), secondary structural elements (such as α-helix and β-strand), hydrophobicity, and molecular recognition features (MoRFs). Specifically, we observed an 8-14% decay in random coils and IDR lengths per million years per protein, and a 2.3-6.5% increase in structured elements, hydrophobicity, and MoRFs. These patterns of structural evolution align with changes in amino acid composition over time. We also revealed significantly higher positive charges but smaller molecular weights for de novo proteins than duplicates. Tertiary structure predictions demonstrated that most de novo proteins, though not typically well-folded on their own, readily form low-energy and compact complexes with extensive residue contacts and conformational flexibility, suggesting “a faster-binding” scenario in de novo proteins to promote interaction. Our findings illuminate the rapid evolution of protein structure in the early life of de novo proteins in rice genome, originating from noncoding sequences, highlighting their quick transformation into active, complex-forming components within a remarkably short evolutionary timeframe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.24.573215

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1038/s41559-022-01925-6 · DOI
  2. 1961, Studies on the reduction and re-formation of protein disulfide bonds, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 236, 1361, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64177-8 · DOI
  3. 2017, High GC content causes orphan proteins to be intrinsically disordered, PLoS computational biology, 13, e1005375, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005375 · DOI
  4. 10.3390/genes13091605 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/plcell/koac076 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.02.019 · DOI
  7. 2021, Uncovering de novo gene birth in yeast using deep transcriptomics, Nature Communications, 12, 604, 10.1038/s41467-021-20911-3 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.11.010 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.05.032 · DOI
  10. Broeils LA , Ruiz-Orera J , Snel B , Hubner N , van Heesch S 2023. Evolution and implications of de novo genes in humans. Nature ecology & evolution: 1–12. · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.str.2017.09.006 · DOI
  13. 10.1534/genetics.107.084491 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nature11184 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/srep10386 · DOI
  16. 10.1101/2023.11.14.567139 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41467-023-41669-w · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nrg3521 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/science.7529940 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nrm.2017.58 · DOI
  22. 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00020 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S1093-3263(00)00138-8 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.053 · DOI
  26. 10.1101/2022.06.06.494887 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.08.039 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/gbe/evac055 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.cpb.2016.12.005 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020100 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.2120456119 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41559-023-02010-2 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00239-020-09939-z · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.049 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkh429 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00105.x · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41580-023-00673-0 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.str.2013.06.020 · DOI
  40. 10.1126/science.860134 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1914866117 · DOI
  42. 2022, Improving peptide-protein docking with AlphaFold-Multimer using forced sampling, Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2, 85
  43. 10.1101/gr.101386.109 · DOI
  44. 10.1101/gr.095026.109 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkab295 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41467-021-21667-6 · DOI
  47. 2019, A comprehensive review on current advances in peptide drug development and design, International journal of molecular sciences, 20, 2383, 10.3390/ijms20102383 · DOI
  48. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Liljas A , et al. 2016. Textbook of structural biology: World Scientific. · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.7682012 · DOI
  51. 10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133301 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Mayr E . 1982. The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance: Harvard University Press.
  53. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S1-S12 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/molbev/msad098 · DOI
  55. 10.1042/EBC20200108 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2023.140948 · DOI
  57. Ohno S . 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication: Springer-Verlag. · DOI · Paper page
  58. 1972, So much “junk” DNA in our genome, Brookhaven symposia in biology, 23, 366
  59. 10.1101/gr.275638.121 · DOI
  60. 10.1101/2023.03.13.532420 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/advs.202204140 · DOI
  62. 2018, Incipient de novo genes can evolve from frozen accidents that escaped rapid transcript turnover, Nature ecology & evolution, 2, 1626, 10.1038/s41559-018-0639-7 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/s41588-018-0040-0 · DOI
  64. 2014, NCYM, a Cis-antisense gene of MYCN, encodes a de novo evolved protein that inhibits GSK3β resulting in the stabilization of MYCN in human neuroblastomas, PLOS Genetics, 10, e1003996, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003996 · DOI
  65. 10.1353/pbm.2014.0006 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02169-2 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1002/pro.2261 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/molbev/msx315 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111808 · DOI
  71. 10.7554/eLife.07454 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.029 · DOI
  73. Weibel CA , Wheeler AL , James JE , Willis SM , Masel J . 2023. A new codon adaptation metric predicts vertebrate body size and tendency to protein disorder. In: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. · DOI
  74. 2017, Young genes are highly disordered as predicted by the preadaptation hypothesis of de novo gene birth, Nature ecology & evolution, 1, 0146, 10.1038/s41559-017-0146 · DOI
  75. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009654 · DOI
  76. 10.1101/510214 · DOI
  77. 10.7554/eLife.44392 · DOI
  78. 10.1002/pmic.201100540 · DOI
  79. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw514 · DOI
  80. 10.1039/C5MB00640F · DOI
  81. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu580 · DOI
  82. 2019, Rapid evolution of protein diversity by de novo origination in Oryza, Nature ecology & evolution, 3, 679, 10.1038/s41559-019-0822-5 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1007/s12013-013-9638-0 · DOI
  84. 10.1126/science.1248286 · DOI
  85. 10.3390/genes12111777 · DOI
  86. 10.1073/pnas.1817138116 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chen, J., Li, Q., Xia, S., Arsala, D., Sosa, D., Wang, D., & Long, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Jianhai
  • Wang, Dong
  • Long, Manyuan
Venue
Genome Biology and Evolution
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-25
Volume
16
Issue
6
ISSN
1759-6653 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396952715
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genome Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM139782, R01GM148476)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
protein evolution, intrinsically disordered regions, random coil, secondary structure, hydrophobicity, molecular recognition features, gene duplication, rice genome, Oryza, protein complex formation, protein-protein interaction, amino acid composition
MeSH terms
Plant Proteins, Oryza, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review