The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
A Comprehensive Resource for Exploring Antiphage Defense: DefenseFinder Webservice, Wiki and Databases.
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.24072/pcjournal.470 · Paper page
Abstract
In recent years, a vast number of novel antiphage defense mechanisms were uncovered. To facilitate the exploration of mechanistic, ecological, and evolutionary aspects related to antiphage defense systems, we released DefenseFinder in 2021 (Tesson et al., 2022). DefenseFinder is a bioinformatic program designed for the systematic identification of known antiphage defense mechanisms. The initial release of DefenseFinder v1.0.0 included 60 systems. Over the past three years, the number of antiphage systems incorporated into DefenseFinder has grown to 152. The increasing number of known systems makes it a challenge to enter the field and makes the interpretation of detections of antiphage systems difficult. Moreover, the rapid development of sequence-based predictions of structures offers novel possibilities of analysis and should be easily available. To overcome these challenges, we present a hub of resources on defense systems, including: 1) an updated version of DefenseFinder with a web-service search function, 2) a community-curated repository of knowledge on the systems, and 3) precomputed databases, which include annotations done on RefSeq genomes and structure predictions generated by AlphaFold. These pages can be freely accessed for users as a starting point on their journey to better understand a given system. We anticipate that these resources will foster the use of bioinformatics in the study of antiphage systems and will serve the community of researchers who study antiphage systems. This resource is available at: https://defensefinder.mdmlab.fr.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 59 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1038/s41579-023-00934-x · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-genet-022120-112523 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.012 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-022-01162-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-16703-w · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-022-01158-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.020 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00904-06 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8432 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.015 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2762-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abb1083 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-022-01157-1 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.08.12.503731 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.11.22.567924 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2022.102238 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00438-004-1048-y · DOI
- 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.72 · DOI
- 10.1128/mSystems.00534-20 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102313 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2022.02.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.24072/pcjournal.250 · DOI
- 10.21105/joss.04296 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac247 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.110.121798 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.09.27.462013 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.05.28.542683 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05444-z · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06855-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41594-023-01172-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1077 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7490/f1000research.1114334.1 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.09.02.506364 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Tesson, F., Planel, R., Egorov, A. A., Georjon, H., Vaysset, H., Brancotte, B., Neron, B., Mordret, E., Atkinson, G. C., Bernheim, A., & Cury, J.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Lund University (SE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institut Pasteur (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Cury, Jean
- ORCID
- Venue
- Peer Community Journal
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-01-26
- Volume
- 4
- ISSN
- 2804-3871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402815517
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 16
- FWCI
- 32.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Peer Community Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (R21042KS/RSE22002KSA, R21042KS)
- National Science Council (2018-05973)
- Linköpings Universitet (2018-05973, 2022-06725)
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2018-05973, 2020.0037)
- Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (2018-05973)
- Vetenskapsrådet (2019-01085, 2023-02353, 05973, 2022-01603, 2018-, 201805973, 2022-06725)
- Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- phage resistance, CRISPR-Cas, phage immunity, web services, knowledge base, genome annotation, AlphaFold structure prediction, RefSeq genomes, bioinformatics resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review