PreprintCited by 4Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Binding Site Maturation Modulated by Molecular Density Underlies Ndc80 Binding to Kinetochore Receptor CENP-T

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2401344121 · Paper page

Abstract

Macromolecular assembly depends on tightly regulated pairwise binding interactions that are selectively favored at assembly sites while being disfavored in the soluble phase. This selective control can arise due to molecular density-enhanced binding, as recently found for the kinetochore scaffold protein CENP-T. When clustered, CENP-T recruits markedly more Ndc80 complexes than its monomeric counterpart, but the underlying molecular basis remains elusive. Here, we use quantitative in vitro assays to reveal two distinct mechanisms driving this behavior. First, Ndc80 binding to CENP-T is a two-step process: initially, Ndc80 molecules rapidly associate and dissociate from disordered N-terminal binding sites on CENP-T. Over time, these sites undergo maturation, resulting in stronger Ndc80 retention. Second, we find that this maturation transition is regulated by a kinetic barrier that is sensitive to the molecular environment. In the soluble phase, binding site maturation is slow, but within CENP-T clusters, this process is markedly accelerated. Notably, the two Ndc80 binding sites in human CENP-T exhibit distinct maturation rates and environmental sensitivities, which correlate with their different amino-acid content and predicted binding conformations. This clustering-induced maturation is evident in dividing human cells, suggesting a distinct regulatory entry point for controlling kinetochore assembly. We propose that the tunable acceleration of binding site maturation by molecular crowding may represent a general mechanism for promoting the formation of macromolecular structures. Significance Statement: A distinctive mechanism of protein-protein interaction underpins the assembly of kinetochores, which is critical for human cell division. During mitosis, the Ndc80 complex must bind tightly to the unstructured N-terminus of its receptor, CENP-T, which is densely clustered at kinetochores. Using single-molecule in vitro assays, we show that Ndc80 binding is mediated by an initially unstable yet tunable interface. The high molecular density of CENP-T at the kinetochores accelerates the maturation of this binding interface, favoring the formation of stable complexes within the kinetochore structure, rather than in the soluble phase. This environment-driven modulation of binding site maturation may represent a key regulatory mechanism for ensuring strong and specific interactions during the assembly of macromolecular complexes such as kinetochores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.02.25.581584

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1074/mcp.M113.037309 · DOI · Paper page
  2. D. N. Itzhak , S. Tyanova , J. Cox , G. H. Borner , Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization. Elife 5 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1101/cshperspect.a015826 · DOI
  4. A. Musacchio , A. Desai , A Molecular View of Kinetochore Assembly and Function. Biology 6 (2017). · DOI
  5. 10.1083/jcb.201301006 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.059 · DOI
  7. 2018, Multiple phosphorylations control recruitment of the KMN network onto kinetochores, Nature cell biology, 20, 1434, 10.1038/s41556-018-0252-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1083/jcb.201407074 · DOI
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M804207200 · DOI
  10. 10.1083/jcb.201901004 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.08.022 · DOI
  12. 10.1534/genetics.113.150839 · DOI
  13. 10.1091/MBC.E20-07-0461/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/MBC-32-1241-G007.JPEG · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41556-023-01313-7 · DOI
  15. P. J. Huis In ‘t Veld , S. Jeganathan , A. Petrovic , P. Singh , J. John , V. Krenn , F. Weissmann , T. Bange , A. Musacchio , Molecular basis of outer kinetochore assembly on CENP-T. Elife 5 (2016). · DOI
  16. 10.1038/ncomms9161 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.020 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.003 · DOI
  19. 10.1083/jcb.201012050 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nature18010 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acsnano.8b02805 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/emboj.2012.348 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41586-021-03365-x · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00220 · DOI
  26. 2016, Binding Mechanisms of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Theory, Simulation, and Experiment, Front Mol Biosci, 3, 52
  27. 10.1039/C3CP54226B · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.004 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s41580-021-00387-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1242/jcs.00645 · DOI
  31. 10.1042/BJ20110137 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/ncb3323 · DOI
  33. 10.1083/jcb.201703152 · DOI
  34. 10.1128/MCB.25.5.1958-1970.2005 · DOI
  35. M. A. Lampson , E. L. Grishchuk , Mechanisms to Avoid and Correct Erroneous Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments. Biology 6 (2017). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tarasovetc, E. V., Sissoko, G. B., Maiorov, A., Mukhina, A. S., Ataullakhanov, F. I., Cheeseman, I. M., & Grishchuk, E. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
Corresponding author
Grishchuk, Ekaterina L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-02-26
Volume
121
Issue
52
Pages
e2401344121-e2401344121
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405610882
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2029868)
  • American Cancer Society (TLC-20-117-01-TLC)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Yale University
  • Colorado State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM141747, R35GM126930, R35GM141747)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
Ndc80 complex, CENP-T, kinetochore assembly, macromolecular crowding, molecular density, protein clustering, disordered protein regions, mitotic spindle, macromolecular complexes, protein-protein interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review