Cited by 649

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization

Itzhak, Daniel N, Tyanova, Stefka, Cox, Jürgen, Borner, Georg HH·2016·eLife

Abstract

Subcellular localization critically influences protein function, and cells control protein localization to regulate biological processes. We have developed and applied Dynamic Organellar Maps, a proteomic method that allows global mapping of protein translocation events. We initially used maps statically to generate a database with localization and absolute copy number information for over 8700 proteins from HeLa cells, approaching comprehensive coverage. All major organelles were resolved, with exceptional prediction accuracy (estimated at >92%). Combining spatial and abundance information yielded an unprecedented quantitative view of HeLa cell anatomy and organellar composition, at the protein level. We subsequently demonstrated the dynamic capabilities of the approach by capturing translocation events following EGF stimulation, which we integrated into a quantitative model. Dynamic Organellar Maps enable the proteome-wide analysis of physiological protein movements, without requiring any reagents specific to the investigated process, and will thus be widely applicable in cell biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.16950

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial proteomics data from human and mouse cells reveal that SNX family members with a potential phosphorylation site in the conserved lipid-binding pocket are more abundant in the cytoplasm compared to those lacking this site.

    “Spatial proteomics data from human and mouse cells further reinforce this trend, revealing that SNX family members with a potential phosphorylation site in the conserved lipid-binding pocket are more abundant in the cytoplasm compared to those lacking this site (43, 44).”

    From Phosphorylation of SNX17 impedes activation of Retriever-mediated sorting (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Materials and methods (Bioinformatic analysis; page not provided) describe quantitative cytosolic and organellar distributions in human cells, so this paper is a source of spatial proteomics data. The Discussion (Accurate, quantitative and reproducible organellar maps; page not provided) compares its human-cell map with a separate mouse-cell study. Our copy does not report the claimed comparison between SNX family members with and without a potential phosphorylation site in the lipid-binding pocket. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Attardi, 1969, Membrane-bound ribosomes in HeLa cells. I. Their proportion to total cell ribosomes and their association with messenger RNA, Journal of Molecular Biology, 44, 47, 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90404-5 · DOI
  2. Borner, 2014, Fractionation profiling: a fast and versatile approach for mapping vesicle proteomes and protein-protein interactions, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 25, 3178, 10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1198 · DOI
  3. Breker, 2013, A novel single-cell screening platform reveals proteome plasticity during yeast stress responses, Journal of Cell Biology, 200, 839, 10.1083/jcb.201301120 · DOI
  4. Calvo, 2016, MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins, Nucleic Acids Research, 44, D1251, 10.1093/nar/gkv1003 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Christoforou, 2016, A draft map of the mouse pluripotent stem cell spatial proteome, Nature Communications, 7, 8992, 10.1038/ncomms9992 · DOI
  6. Cox, 2014, Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 13, 2513, 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cox, 2008, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification, Nature Biotechnology, 26, 1367, 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Deeb, 2015, Machine Learning-based Classification of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients by Their Protein Expression Profiles, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 14, 2947, 10.1074/mcp.M115.050245 · DOI
  9. Dunkley, 2004, Localization of organelle proteins by isotope tagging (LOPIT), Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 3, 1128, 10.1074/mcp.T400009-MCP200 · DOI
  10. Fauconnier, 2009, Outliers detection with the minimum covariance determinant estimator in practice, Statistical Methodology, 6, 363, 10.1016/j.stamet.2008.12.005 · DOI
  11. Fisher, 1967, Electron microscope studies of the microvilli of HeLa cells, Journal of Cell Biology, 34, 569, 10.1083/jcb.34.2.569 · DOI
  12. Foster, 2006, A mammalian organelle map by protein correlation profiling, Cell, 125, 187, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.022 · DOI
  13. Gatto, 2014, A foundation for reliable spatial proteomics data analysis, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 13, 1937, 10.1074/mcp.M113.036350 · DOI
  14. Geiger, 2010, Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue, Nature Methods, 7, 383, 10.1038/nmeth.1446 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gilchrist, 2006, Quantitative proteomics analysis of the secretory pathway, Cell, 127, 1265, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.036 · DOI
  16. Grøvdal, 2004, Direct interaction of Cbl with pTyr 1045 of the EGF receptor (EGFR) is required to sort the EGFR to lysosomes for degradation, Experimental Cell Research, 300, 388, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.07.003 · DOI
  17. Humphrey, 2015, High-throughput phosphoproteomics reveals in vivo insulin signaling dynamics, Nature Biotechnology, 33, 990, 10.1038/nbt.3327 · DOI
  18. Jones, 2014, Interdependent epidermal growth factor receptor signalling and trafficking, International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 51, 23, 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.03.014 · DOI
  19. Larance, 2015, Multidimensional proteomics for cell biology, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 16, 269, 10.1038/nrm3970 · DOI
  20. Lubas, 2011, Interaction profiling identifies the human nuclear exosome targeting complex, Molecular Cell, 43, 624, 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.028 · DOI
  21. Malapeira, 2011, ADAM17 (TACE) regulates TGFβ signaling through the cleavage of vasorin, Oncogene, 30, 1912, 10.1038/onc.2010.565 · DOI
  22. Marx, 2015, Mapping proteins with spatial proteomics, Nature Methods, 12, 815, 10.1038/nmeth.3555 · DOI
  23. Oda, 2005, A comprehensive pathway map of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, Molecular Systems Biology, 1, 2005.0010, 10.1038/msb4100014 · DOI
  24. Ong, 2002, Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 1, 376, 10.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP200 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Plotnikov, 2011, The MAPK cascades: signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation, Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta, 1813, 1619, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.12.012 · DOI
  26. Quinn, 1984, Density of newly synthesized plasma membrane proteins in intracellular membranes II. Biochemical studies, Journal of Cell Biology, 98, 2142, 10.1083/jcb.98.6.2142 · DOI
  27. Raguz, 2007, Suppressor of T-cell receptor signalling 1 and 2 differentially regulate endocytosis and signalling of receptor tyrosine kinases, FEBS Letters, 581, 4767, 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.08.077 · DOI
  28. Scheltema, 2014, The Q Exactive HF, a Benchtop mass spectrometer with a pre-filter, high-performance quadrupole and an ultra-high-field Orbitrap analyzer, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 13, 3698, 10.1074/mcp.M114.043489 · DOI
  29. Smirle, 2013, Cell biology of the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus through proteomics, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 5, a015073, 10.1101/cshperspect.a015073 · DOI
  30. Tiwari, 1987, Functional equivalents of interferon-mediated signals needed for induction of an mRNA can be generated by double-stranded RNA and growth factors, EMBO Journal, 6, 3373, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02659.x · DOI
  31. Uhlén, 2015, Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome, Science, 347, 1260419, 10.1126/science.1260419 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Varmuza, 2009, Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Chemometrics, 10.1201/9781420059496 · DOI
  33. Zanivan, 2012, In vivo quantitative proteomics: the SILAC mouse, Methods in Molecular Biology, 757, 435, 10.1007/978-1-61779-166-6_25 · DOI
  34. Zeiler, 2012, A Protein Epitope Signature Tag (PrEST) library allows SILAC-based absolute quantification and multiplexed determination of protein copy numbers in cell lines, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 11, O111.009613, 10.1074/mcp.O111.009613 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Itzhak, D. N., Tyanova, S., Cox, J., & Borner, G. H.
Affiliations
Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-06-09
Volume
5
ISSN
2050-084X
Cited by
649
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Preis)
  • Louis-Jeantet Foundation
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review