Detecting Genetic Interactions with Visible Neural Networks
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-025-08157-x
Abstract
Non-linear interactions among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genes, and pathways play an important role in human diseases, but identifying these interactions is a challenging task. Neural networks are state-of-the-art predictors in many domains due to their ability to analyze big data and model complex patterns, including non-linear interactions. In genetics, visible neural networks are gaining popularity as they provide insight into the most important SNPs, genes and pathways for prediction. Visible neural networks use prior knowledge (e.g. gene and pathway annotations) to define the connections between nodes in the network, making them sparse and interpretable. Currently, most of these networks provide measures for the importance of SNPs, genes, and pathways but lack details on the nature of the interactions. In this paper, we explore different methods to detect non-linear interactions with visible neural networks. We adapted and sped up existing methods, created a comprehensive benchmark with simulated data from GAMETES and EpiGEN, and demonstrated that these methods can extract multiple types of interactions from trained visible neural networks. Finally, we applied these methods to a genome-wide case-control study of inflammatory bowel disease and found high consistency of the epistasis pairs candidates between the interpretation methods. The follow-up association test on these candidate pairs identified seven significant epistasis pairs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
The International IBD Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC), Ellinghaus, D., International Genetics of Ankylosing Spondylitis Consortium (IGAS), International PSC Study Group (IPSCSG), Genetic Analysis of Psoriasis Consortium (GAPC), Psoriasis Association Genetics Extension (PAGE), Jostins, L., Spain, S. L., Cortes, A., Bethune, J., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3528 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery
Elmarakeby, H. A., Hwang, J., Arafeh, R., Crowdis, J., Gang, S., Liu, D., AlDubayan, S. H., Salari, K., Kregel, S., Richter, C., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03922-4 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Erion, G., Janizek, J. D., Sturmfels, P., Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00343-w · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Visible Machine Learning for Biomedicine
Yu, M. K., Ma, J., Fisher, J., Kreisberg, J. F., Raphael, B. J., & Ideker, T. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.056 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- van Hilten, A., Melograna, F., Fan, B., Niessen, W., van Steen, K., & Roshchupkin, G.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Melograna, Federico
- Roshchupkin, Gennady
- ORCID
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-02-29
- OpenAlex
- W4392352464
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- IMAGINE - Repository of the Institute of molecular genetics and genetic engineering (University of Belgrade) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 813533, 860895)
- ZonMw (1936320)
- Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- genetic interactions, epistasis, single nucleotide polymorphisms, nonlinear interactions, interpretability, benchmark, inflammatory bowel disease, case-control association, gametes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review