Cited by 303Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Improving performance of deep learning models with axiomatic attribution priors and expected gradients

Open access

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-021-00343-w

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Smilkov, D., Thorat, N., Kim, B., Viégas, F. & Wattenberg, M. Smoothgrad: removing noise by adding noise. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03825 (2017). · arXiv
  2. Recht, B., Roelofs, R., Schmidt, L. & Shankar, V. Do ImageNet classifiers generalize to ImageNet? Proc. of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 97, 5389–5400 (PMLR, 2019).
  3. Tsipras, D., Santurkar, S., Engstrom, L., Turner, A. & Madry, A. Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2019).
  4. Feng, J. & Simon, N. Sparse-input neural networks for high-dimensional nonparametric regression and classification. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07592 (2017). · arXiv
  5. Ross, A., Lage, I. & Doshi-Velez, F. The neural lasso: local linear sparsity for interpretable explanations. In Workshop on Transparent and Interpretable Machine Learning in Safety Critical Environments, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2017).
  6. Zhang, H., Cisse, M., Dauphin, Y. N. & Lopez-Paz, D. mixup: beyond empirical risk minimization. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2018).
  7. Shi, Y. & Chang, Q. Efficient algorithm for isotropic and anisotropic total variation deblurring and denoising. J. Appl. Math. 2013, 797239 (2013).
  8. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014).
  9. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (eds. Bengio, Y. & LeCun, Y.) (ICLR, 2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erion, G., Janizek, J. D., Sturmfels, P., Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Su-In
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2021-05-31
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
620-631
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3105856249
Cited by
300
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R35GM128638, F30HL151074-01, 5T32GM007266-46, R01AG061132, DGE-1256082)
  • National Science Foundation (DBI-1552309, DBI-1759487)
  • American Cancer Society (RSG-14-257-01-TBG)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
feature attribution, model performance improvement, completeness axiom, neural network interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review