PreprintCited by 7CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MOSAIC: a highly efficient, one-step recombineering approach to plasmid editing and diversification

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acssynbio.4c00657

Abstract

The editing of plasmids and construction of plasmid libraries is paramount to the engineering of desired functionalities in synthetic biology. Typically, plasmids with targeted mutations are produced through time– and resource-consuming DNA amplification and/or cloning steps. In this study, we establish MOSAIC, a highly efficient protocol for the editing of plasmids and generation of combinatorial plasmid libraries. This quick protocol employs the efficient single-stranded DNA annealing protein (SSAP) CspRecT to incorporate (libraries of) DNA oligos harboring the desired mutations into a target plasmid in E. coli. In addition to up to 90% single-target plasmid editing efficiency, we demonstrate that MOSAIC enables the generation of a combinatorial plasmid library spanning four different target regions on a plasmid, in a single transformation. Lastly, we integrated a user-friendly validation pipeline using Nanopore sequencing reads, requiring minimal computational experience. We anticipate that MOSAIC will provide researchers with a simple, rapid and resource-effective method to edit plasmids or generate large, diverse plasmid libraries for a wide range of in vivo or in vitro applications in molecular and synthetic biology. Abstract Figure: GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT:

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.03.22.586135

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1038/nbt.1568 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41467-022-32829-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41929-022-00836-w · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41587-019-0157-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107762 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/bies.202100052 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003647 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nmeth.1318 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/sb4001992 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41467-020-16175-y · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.120163297 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkab1076 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature08187 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/1526-968X(200101)29:1<14::AID-GENE1001>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.03.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/sb400051t · DOI
  20. 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00112 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jgg.2019.07.006 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00265 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00375 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.2001588117 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/1751-7915.13609 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41467-024-53226-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq281 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkac247 · DOI
  30. 1974, Replication of colicin E1 plasmid DNA in cell extracts, Origin and direction of replication. PNAS, 71, 2260
  31. 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90502-0 · DOI
  32. 2015, Mechanisms of theta plasmid replication, Microbiol. Spectr, 3, PLAS-0029-2014
  33. 10.1038/nprot.2014.082 · DOI
  34. 10.1186/s12934-016-0610-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/nar/gks1119 · DOI
  36. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0955 · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.273.14.8447 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0005-2787(77)90249-0 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/BF00338997 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41467-020-17863-5 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.11.006 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108238 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41467-021-25665-6 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00403 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
van den Brink, M., Althuis, T. Y., Danelon, C., & Claassens, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Danelon, Christophe
  • Claassens, Nico J.
Venue
ACS Synthetic Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-03-22
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
3880-3889
ISSN
2161-5063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411058247
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Synthetic Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-22-CPJ2-0091-01)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024.003.019, OCENW.XL21.XL21.007, 024.003, OCENW.XL21, XL21.007, VI.Veni.192.156)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
recombineering, Escherichia coli
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, DNA, Single-Stranded, Escherichia coli, Mutation, Plasmids, Gene Library, Synthetic Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review