Cited by 1,844RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression

Open access
Salis, Howard M, Mirsky, Ethan A, Voigt, Christopher A·2009·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Microbial engineering often requires fine control over protein expression--for example, to connect genetic circuits or control flux through a metabolic pathway. To circumvent the need for trial and error optimization, we developed a predictive method for designing synthetic ribosome binding sites, enabling a rational control over the protein expression level. Experimental validation of >100 predictions in Escherichia coli showed that the method is accurate to within a factor of 2.3 over a range of 100,000-fold. The design method also correctly predicted that reusing identical ribosome binding site sequences in different genetic contexts can result in different protein expression levels. We demonstrate the method's utility by rationally optimizing protein expression to connect a genetic sensor to a synthetic circuit. The proposed forward engineering approach should accelerate the construction and systematic optimization of large genetic systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.1568

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A fully rational approach to designing functional 5′ UTRs has not yet been implemented.

    “While there has been some success in this effort in prokaryotes, yeast and even mammalian cells27,34–36, a fully rational approach to designing functional 5′ UTRs has not yet been implemented.”

    From Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay (2019) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Materials and Methods section (Software Implementation; page unavailable) says the authors implemented an RBS Calculator that optimizes ribosome-binding-site sequences to rationally control protein expression. This contradicts the unqualified assertion that a rational design approach had not been implemented, although the paper addresses bacterial ribosome-binding sites rather than every feature of a 5′ UTR. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evo's zero-shot correlation on promoter-RBS sequences exceeded GC content (r = 0.47), GenSLM (r = 0.11), and RBS Calculator (r = 0.39).

    “Evo’s zero-shot correlation on promoter-RBS sequences is also higher than the GC content of the promoter-RBS sequences (Spearman r = 0.47), zero-shot GenSLM likelihoods (Spearman r = 0.11), and RBS Calculator (Spearman r = 0.39)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salis, H. M., Mirsky, E. A., & Voigt, C. A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Voigt, Christopher A
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2009-10
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
946-950
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2047360542
Cited by
1,844
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 155 · 2017: 129 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 103
FWCI
27.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (EY016546, PN2EY016546, PN1EY016546)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R56AI067699, R01AI067699, AI067699)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
translation rate, design automation, synthetic gene circuits, metabolic pathway engineering, Escherichia coli, forward engineering, synthetic biology
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Binding Sites, Cloning, Molecular, DNA, Recombinant, Escherichia coli, Genetic Engineering, Ribosomal Proteins, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, Thermodynamics, Protein Biosynthesis, Reproducibility of Results, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review