PreprintCited by 7RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-scale Simulations of MUT-16 Scaffold Protein Phase Separation and Client Recognition

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.bpj.2025.08.001 · Paper page

Abstract

Phase separation of proteins plays a critical role in cellular organisation. How phase separated protein condensates underpin biological function and how condensates achieve specificity remain elusive. We investigated the phase separation of MUT-16, a scaffold protein in Mutator foci , and its role in recruiting the client protein MUT-8, a key component in RNA silencing in C. elegans . We employed a multiscale approach that combined coarse-grained (residue-level CALVADOS2 and near-atomistic Martini3) and atomistic simulations. Simulations across different resolutions provide a consistent perspective on how MUT-16 condensates recruit MUT-8, enabling the fine-tuning of chemical details while balancing the computational cost. Both coarse-grained models (CALVADOS2 and Martini3) predicted the relative phase separation propensities of MUT-16’s disordered regions, which we confirmed through in vitro experiments. Simulations also identified key sequence features and residues driving phase separation while revealing differences in residue interaction propensities between CALVADOS2 and Martini3. Furthermore, Martini3 and 350 µs atomistic simulations on Folding@Home of MUT-8’s N-terminal prion-like domain with MUT-16 M8BR cluster highlighted the importance of cation- π interactions between Tyr residues of MUT-8 and Arg residues of MUT-16 M8BR. Lys residues were observed to be more prone to interact in Martini3. Atomistic simulations revealed that the guanidinium group of Arg also engages in sp 2 - π interactions and hydrogen bonds with the backbone of Tyr, making Arg-Tyr interactions stronger than Lys-Tyr, where these additional favourable contacts are absent. In agreement with our simulations, in vitro co-expression pulldown experiments demonstrated a progressive loss of MUT-8 recruitment following the mutation of Arg in MUT-16 M8BR to Lys or Ala, confirming the critical role of Arg in this interaction. These findings advance our understanding of MUT-16 phase separation and subsequent MUT-8 recruitment, key processes in assembling Mutator foci that drive RNA silencing in C. elegans . Statement of Significance: In cells proteins phase separate and form condensates. These protein condensates can play important role in bringing molecules together and facilitate biochemical processes. In this work, we used molecular dynamics simulations to understand how MUT-16 phase separates and forms the scaffold of the so-called Mutator focus . Mutator foci produce small RNA which help to regulates genes. As the scaffold of the Mutator focus , MUT-16 recruit multiple proteins which are important for the production of such small RNAs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.04.13.589337

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013325 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature10879 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.aaw8653 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nphys3532 · DOI
  5. 10.1074/jbc.TM118.001192 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00008 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.7554/eLife.31486 · DOI
  8. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-071819-113553 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.aaw8653 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006 · DOI
  11. Rekhi, S. ; Garcia, C. G. ; Barai, M. ; Rizuan, A. ; Schuster, B. S. ; Kiick, K. L. ; Mittal, J . Expanding the molecular language of protein liquid–liquid phase separation. Nature Chemistry 2024, 1–12. · DOI
  12. 10.1021/jp0525179 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/1099-0690(200009)2000:17<2967::AID-EJOC2967>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0010-8545(01)00380-0 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9459 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nrm.2017.7 · DOI
  17. Pritišanac, I. ; Alderson, T. R. ; Kolarić, D̈ .; Zarin, T. ; Xie, S. ; Lu, A. X. ; Alam, A. ; Maqsood, A. ; Youn, J.-Y. ; Forman-Kay, J. D. , et al. A Functional Map of the Human Intrinsically Disordered Proteome. bioRxiv 2024, 2024–03. · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.009 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.012 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nrm2321 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1132839 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.1136699 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nsmb1262 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.007 · DOI
  25. 10.1101/gad.193904.112 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81645-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.02.060 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkae610 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007542 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005941 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41467-023-41586-y · DOI
  32. 10.15252/embj.2021108443 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c10489 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s43588-021-00155-3 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.2111696118 · DOI
  36. Tesei, G. ; Lindorff-Larsen, K . Improved predictions of phase behaviour of intrinsically disordered proteins by tuning the interaction range [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Open Research Europe 2023, 2. · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41586-023-07004-5 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41592-023-02159-5 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/s41592-021-01098-3 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1039/D1SC00374G · DOI
  41. 2023, Optimizing the martini 3 force field reveals the effects of the intricate balance between protein–water interaction strength and salt concentration on biomolecular condensate formation, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 20, 1646
  42. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01042 · DOI
  43. Thomasen, F. E. ; Skaalum, T. ; Kumar, A. ; Srinivasan, S. ; Vanni, S. ; Lindorff-Larsen, K. Recalibration of protein interactions in Martini 3. bioRxiv 2023, 2023–05.
  44. 2020, Simulation of FUS protein condensates with an adapted coarse-grained model, Journal of chemical theory and computation, 17, 525
  45. 2020, Unraveling Molecular Interactions in Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of Disordered Proteins by Atomistic Simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B, 124, 9009, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c06288 · DOI
  46. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c08126 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.10.016 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109363 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/ja802124e · DOI
  50. 2015, GROMACS: High Performance Molecular Simulations Through Multi-Level Parallelism From Laptops to Supercomputers, SoftwareX, 1-2, 19, 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Kroon, P. C. ; Grünewald, F. ; Barnoud, J. ; van Tilburg, M. ; Souza, P. C. ; Wassenaar, T. A. ; Marrink, S.-J. Martinize2 and vermouth: Unified framework for topology generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.01191 2022, · DOI
  52. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00209 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Bussi, G. ; Donadio, D. ; Parrinello, M . Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. The Journal of chemical physics 2007, 126. · DOI
  54. 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/jcc.21787 · DOI
  56. Gowers, R. J. ; Linke, M. ; Barnoud, J. ; Reddy, T. J. E. ; Melo, M. N. ; Seyler, S. L. ; Dotson, D. L. ; Domański, J. ; Buchoux, S. ; Kenney, I. M. ; Beckstein, O . MDAnalysis: A Python Package for the Rapid Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference. 2016; pp 98–105. · DOI
  57. 10.1021/ct400617g · DOI
  58. 10.1002/prot.21123 · DOI
  59. 10.1021/jp901540t · DOI
  60. 2010, Improved Side-Chain Torsion Potentials for the Amber ff99SB Protein Force Field. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf, 78, 1950
  61. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.02.024 · DOI
  62. 2015, Water Dispersion Interactions Strongly Influence Simulated Structural Properties of Disordered Protein States, J. Phys. Chem. B, 119, 5113, 10.1021/jp508971m · DOI
  63. 10.1126/science.290.5498.1903 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/s41467-023-41633-8 · DOI
  65. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007870 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu310 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/s41586-023-06329-5 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/s41594-019-0250-x · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1126/science.271.5246.163 · DOI
  70. 10.1039/C7SC04905F · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gaurav, K., Busetto, V., Páez-Moscoso, D. J., Changiarath, A., Hanson, S. M., Falk, S., Ketting, R. F., & Stelzl, L. S.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Institute of Molecular Biology (DE)
  • Flatiron Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Stelzl, Lukas S.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-04-15
Volume
124
Issue
22
Pages
3987-4004
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413043124
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Gutenberg Open Science (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Gutenberg Open Science (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (2014‐2020, HORIZON2020, 847548)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1551, 464588647)
  • Austrian Science Fund
  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
phase separation, protein-protein interaction, hydrogen bonding, multiscale modeling, RNA silencing, Caenorhabditis elegans
MeSH terms
Phase Separation, Animals, Protein Binding, Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review