The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tandem-repeat proteins introduce tuneable properties to engineered biomolecular condensates
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1039/d5sc00903k
Abstract
The cell’s ability to rapidly partition biomolecules into biomolecular condensates is linked to a diverse range of cellular functions. Understanding how the structural attributes of biomolecular condensates are linked with their biological roles can be facilitated by the development synthetic condensate systems that can be manipulated in a controllable and predictable way. Here, we design and characterise a tuneable synthetic biomolecular condensate platform fusing modular consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeat (CTPR) proteins to intrinsically-disordered domains. Trends between the CTPR structural attributes and condensate propensity were recapitulated across different experimental conditions and by in silico modelling, demonstrating that the CTPR domain can systematically affect the condensates in a predictable manner. Moreover, we show that incorporating short binding motifs into the CTPR domain results in specific target-protein recruitment into the condensates. Our model system can be rationally designed in a versatile manner to both tune condensate propensity and endow the condensates with new functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1038/s44222-023-00052-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41580-020-00326-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21181-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-021-00801-x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-022-01252-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-33221-z · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.REV119.007895 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M117.800466 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmat4418 · DOI
- 10.1039/c8sc04253e · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-35529-2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1504822112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acsnano.8b04304 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-05403-1 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00250 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41557-023-01321-y · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1502-y · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.18746 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201907278 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0404530102 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12192-010-0248-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-49905-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00076-5 · DOI
- 10.1039/d0sc03175e · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3586 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1136 · DOI
- 10.1039/d0mt00093k · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00592 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41557-020-0465-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth1026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.07.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.038 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2644-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41557-021-00840-w · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biophys-121219-081629 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.06.14.543914 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaw8653 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.056 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-35265-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/s43588-021-00155-3 · DOI
- 10.1039/F29777301133 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4823499 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2183308 · DOI
- 10.1016/0009-2614(77)85375-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(74)90566-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0341-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10879 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00814 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.80038 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1917569117 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2209975119 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.10.19.563018 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2422 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E08-12-1248 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15548627.2016.1238552 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2013.09.023 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-021-00840-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.054 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-020-0579-9 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsta.2004.1381 · DOI
- Weil, K. G. Molecular Theory of Capillarity. 586 (Clarendon Press, 1984). · DOI
- 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Chris Ng, T. L., Hoare, M. P., Maristany, M. J., Wilde, E. J., Sneideris, T., Huertas, J., Agbetiameh, B. K., Furukawa, M., Joseph, J. A., Knowles, T. P. J., Collepardo-Guevara, R., Itzhaki, L. S., & Kumita, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kumita, Janet R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-04-20
- OpenAlex
- W4394988291
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (101023060)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/X02332X/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- biomolecular condensates, tetratricopeptide repeat proteins, intrinsically disordered regions, in silico modeling, liquid-liquid phase separation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review