PreprintCited by 0Protein Structure and DynamicsFungal and yeast genetics researchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residues Neighboring an SH3-Binding Motif Participate in the Interaction In Vivo

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/genetics/iyaf153 · Paper page

Abstract

In signaling networks, protein-protein interactions are often mediated by modular domains that bind short linear motifs. The motifs’ sequences affect many factors, among them affinity and specificity, or the ability to bind strongly and to the appropriate partners. Using Deep Mutational Scanning to create a mutant library, and protein complementation assays to measure protein-protein interactions, we determined the in vivo binding strength of a library of mutants of a binding motif on the MAP kinase kinase Pbs2, which binds the SH3 domain of the osmosensor protein Sho1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . These measurements were made using the full-length endogenous proteins, in their native cellular environment. We find that along with residues within the canonical motif, many mutations in the residues neighboring the motif also modulate binding strength. Interestingly, all Pbs2 mutations which increase binding are situated outside of the Pbs2 region that interacts with the canonical SH3 binding pocket, suggesting that other surfaces on Sho1 contribute to binding. We use predicted structures and mutations to propose a model of binding which involves residues neighboring the canonical Pbs2 motif binding outside of the canonical SH3 binding pocket. We compared this predicted structure with known structures of SH3 domains binding peptides through residues outside of the motif, and put forth possible mechanisms through which Pbs2 can bind specifically to Sho1. We propose that for certain SH3 domain-motif pairs, affinity and specificity are determined by a broader range of sequences than what has previously been considered, potentially allowing easier differentiation between otherwise similar partners. Summary: Protein-protein interactions are often mediated by a binding domain on one protein and a short disordered binding motif on another protein. We measured the binding strength of a mutant library of a binding motif situated in the yeast protein Pbs2 to the SH3 domain of Sho1. Many mutations in the residues neighboring the motif affect binding. A protein structure prediction of the interaction partners shows that residues neighboring the motif bind residues outside the known binding pocket on the SH3 domain. The Sho1-Pbs2 interaction differs enough from other known SH3-motif pairs to allow specific binding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.13.593936

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. Amberg D. , D. C. Burke , and J. N. Strathern , 2005 Methods in yeast genetics: a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  2. 2017, Robust synthetic circuits for two-dimensional control of gene expression in yeast. ACS Synth, Biol, 6, 545
  3. 10.1038/s41467-024-53195-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1997)43:5<383::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.10.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.11.012 · DOI
  8. 2022, Asymmetrical dose responses shape the evolutionary trade-off between antifungal resistance and nutrient use, Nat Ecol Evol, 6, 1501, 10.1038/s41559-022-01846-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41467-025-56597-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41467-021-21873-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.04.005 · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.32472 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00749-9 · DOI
  14. Dubé A. K. , R. Dandage , S. Dibyachintan , U. Dionne , P. C. Després , et al., 2022 Deep Mutational Scanning of Protein–Protein Interactions Between Partners Expressed from Their Endogenous Loci In Vivo, pp. 237–259 in Yeast Functional Genomics: Methods and Protocols, edited by Devaux F. Springer US, New York, NY. · DOI
  15. 10.1039/c0mb00061b · DOI
  16. Evans R. , M. O’Neill , A. Pritzel , N. Antropova , A. Senior , et al., 2022 Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv 2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s41586-022-04586-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12408 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5606 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1039/C2MB25265A · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41467-024-47605-w · DOI
  23. 10.1074/jbc.M111.330753 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkx1077 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl461 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/nar/30.6.e23 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2012, Peptide-Binding Domains: Are Limp Handshakes Safest?, Sci. Signal, 5, e40
  29. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.09.009 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/yea.1142 · DOI
  32. 10.7554/eLife.55160 · DOI
  33. 10.2741/3053 · DOI
  34. 10.1126/scisignal.2003021 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/srep34269 · DOI
  36. 10.1074/mcp.M116.060483 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.1518469113 · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005499 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/sciadv.add2793 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/prot.20921 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkad1058 · DOI
  42. Kursula P. , I. Kursula , Y. H. Song , K. Paraskevopoulos , and M. Wilmanns , 2008 YEAST SHO1 SH3 DOMAIN COMPLEXED WITH A PEPTIDE FROM PBS2 · DOI
  43. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81276-3 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/genetics/iyad175 · DOI
  46. Lemieux P. , A. K. Dube , and C. R. Landry , 2025 A protein-fragment complementation assay to quantify synthetic protein scaffold efficiency. bioRxiv 2025.03.19.640584. · DOI
  47. 10.1042/BJ20050411 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/jacs.9b10710 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/372375a0 · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.7624781 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600036 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.024 · DOI
  53. 2011, Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads, EMBnet.journal, 17, 10, 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-31 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.15252/embr.201846992 · DOI
  56. 2016, The Dihydrofolate Reductase Protein-Fragment Complementation Assay: A Survival-Selection Assay for Large-Scale Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions, Cold Spring Harb. Protoc, 2016, db.prot090027., 10.1101/pdb.prot090027 · DOI
  57. Miyazaki K ., 2011 Chapter seventeen - MEGAWHOP Cloning: A Method of Creating Random Mutagenesis Libraries via Megaprimer PCR of Whole Plasmids, pp. 399–406 in Methods in Enzymology, Synthetic Biology, Part B. edited by Voigt C. Academic Press.
  58. 10.1002/psc.310010507 · DOI
  59. 10.1128/MCB.01817-07 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03292-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/PRO.3943 · DOI
  62. 10.1126/science.276.5319.1702 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10909 · DOI
  65. 10.1073/pnas.2316599120 · DOI
  66. 10.3791/52255 · DOI
  67. 10.7717/peerj.2584 · DOI
  68. 10.1101/pdb.prot086827 · DOI
  69. 10.1534/genetics.112.140863 · DOI
  70. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002524 · DOI
  71. 10.1074/jbc.M109.028431 · DOI
  72. 10.1074/jbc.M110.116749 · DOI
  73. 10.1126/science.1153878 · DOI
  74. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601192 · DOI
  75. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000218 · DOI
  76. 10.1021/cr400585q · DOI
  77. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1038/nmeth.3438 · DOI
  79. Wang C.-H. , P. Mehta , and C. J. Bashor , 2018 The strength of protein-protein interactions controls the information capacity and dynamical response of signaling networks. bioRxiv 469197. · DOI
  80. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90367-0 · DOI
  81. Zarin T. , and B. Lehner , 2024 A complete map of specificity encoding for a partially fuzzy protein interaction. bioRxiv 2024.04.25.591103. · DOI
  82. 10.1038/nature02178 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.011 · DOI
  84. 10.1093/bib/bbac222 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Jordan, D. F., Dubé, A. K., Dionne, U., Bradley, D., & Landry, C. R.
Affiliations
PROTEO (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Jordan, David F.
  • Landry, Christian R.
Venue
Genetics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-14
Volume
231
Issue
2
ISSN
0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412933707
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation (387697, 525827)
  • Human Frontier Science Program (RGP34/2018)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
SH3 domain, short linear motifs, protein-protein interaction, Pbs2, Sho1, MAP kinase kinase, binding affinity, binding specificity, osmosensor, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, deep mutational scanning, protein complementation, binding site model
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, src Homology Domains, Amino Acid Motifs, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review