The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Residues Neighboring an SH3-Binding Motif Participate in the Interaction In Vivo
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/genetics/iyaf153 · Paper page
Abstract
In signaling networks, protein-protein interactions are often mediated by modular domains that bind short linear motifs. The motifs’ sequences affect many factors, among them affinity and specificity, or the ability to bind strongly and to the appropriate partners. Using Deep Mutational Scanning to create a mutant library, and protein complementation assays to measure protein-protein interactions, we determined the in vivo binding strength of a library of mutants of a binding motif on the MAP kinase kinase Pbs2, which binds the SH3 domain of the osmosensor protein Sho1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . These measurements were made using the full-length endogenous proteins, in their native cellular environment. We find that along with residues within the canonical motif, many mutations in the residues neighboring the motif also modulate binding strength. Interestingly, all Pbs2 mutations which increase binding are situated outside of the Pbs2 region that interacts with the canonical SH3 binding pocket, suggesting that other surfaces on Sho1 contribute to binding. We use predicted structures and mutations to propose a model of binding which involves residues neighboring the canonical Pbs2 motif binding outside of the canonical SH3 binding pocket. We compared this predicted structure with known structures of SH3 domains binding peptides through residues outside of the motif, and put forth possible mechanisms through which Pbs2 can bind specifically to Sho1. We propose that for certain SH3 domain-motif pairs, affinity and specificity are determined by a broader range of sequences than what has previously been considered, potentially allowing easier differentiation between otherwise similar partners. Summary: Protein-protein interactions are often mediated by a binding domain on one protein and a short disordered binding motif on another protein. We measured the binding strength of a mutant library of a binding motif situated in the yeast protein Pbs2 to the SH3 domain of Sho1. Many mutations in the residues neighboring the motif affect binding. A protein structure prediction of the interaction partners shows that residues neighboring the motif bind residues outside the known binding pocket on the SH3 domain. The Sho1-Pbs2 interaction differs enough from other known SH3-motif pairs to allow specific binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- Amberg D. , D. C. Burke , and J. N. Strathern , 2005 Methods in yeast genetics: a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
- 2017, Robust synthetic circuits for two-dimensional control of gene expression in yeast. ACS Synth, Biol, 6, 545
- 10.1038/s41467-024-53195-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1997)43:5<383::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.11.012 · DOI
- 2022, Asymmetrical dose responses shape the evolutionary trade-off between antifungal resistance and nutrient use, Nat Ecol Evol, 6, 1501, 10.1038/s41559-022-01846-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-025-56597-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21873-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.04.005 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.32472 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00749-9 · DOI
- Dubé A. K. , R. Dandage , S. Dibyachintan , U. Dionne , P. C. Després , et al., 2022 Deep Mutational Scanning of Protein–Protein Interactions Between Partners Expressed from Their Endogenous Loci In Vivo, pp. 237–259 in Yeast Functional Genomics: Methods and Protocols, edited by Devaux F. Springer US, New York, NY. · DOI
- 10.1039/c0mb00061b · DOI
- Evans R. , M. O’Neill , A. Pritzel , N. Antropova , A. Senior , et al., 2022 Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv 2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04586-4 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12408 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5606 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/C2MB25265A · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-47605-w · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M111.330753 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1077 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl461 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/30.6.e23 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Peptide-Binding Domains: Are Limp Handshakes Safest?, Sci. Signal, 5, e40
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1002/yea.1142 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.55160 · DOI
- 10.2741/3053 · DOI
- 10.1126/scisignal.2003021 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep34269 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M116.060483 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1518469113 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005499 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.add2793 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20921 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkad1058 · DOI
- Kursula P. , I. Kursula , Y. H. Song , K. Paraskevopoulos , and M. Wilmanns , 2008 YEAST SHO1 SH3 DOMAIN COMPLEXED WITH A PEPTIDE FROM PBS2 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81276-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/iyad175 · DOI
- Lemieux P. , A. K. Dube , and C. R. Landry , 2025 A protein-fragment complementation assay to quantify synthetic protein scaffold efficiency. bioRxiv 2025.03.19.640584. · DOI
- 10.1042/BJ20050411 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.9b10710 · DOI
- 10.1038/372375a0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.7624781 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.024 · DOI
- 2011, Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads, EMBnet.journal, 17, 10, 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-13-31 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15252/embr.201846992 · DOI
- 2016, The Dihydrofolate Reductase Protein-Fragment Complementation Assay: A Survival-Selection Assay for Large-Scale Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions, Cold Spring Harb. Protoc, 2016, db.prot090027., 10.1101/pdb.prot090027 · DOI
- Miyazaki K ., 2011 Chapter seventeen - MEGAWHOP Cloning: A Method of Creating Random Mutagenesis Libraries via Megaprimer PCR of Whole Plasmids, pp. 399–406 in Methods in Enzymology, Synthetic Biology, Part B. edited by Voigt C. Academic Press.
- 10.1002/psc.310010507 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.01817-07 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03292-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/PRO.3943 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.276.5319.1702 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10909 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2316599120 · DOI
- 10.3791/52255 · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj.2584 · DOI
- 10.1101/pdb.prot086827 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.112.140863 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0002524 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109.028431 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.116749 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1153878 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601192 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000218 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr400585q · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.3438 · DOI
- Wang C.-H. , P. Mehta , and C. J. Bashor , 2018 The strength of protein-protein interactions controls the information capacity and dynamical response of signaling networks. bioRxiv 469197. · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90367-0 · DOI
- Zarin T. , and B. Lehner , 2024 A complete map of specificity encoding for a partially fuzzy protein interaction. bioRxiv 2024.04.25.591103. · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02178 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbac222 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Jordan, D. F., Dubé, A. K., Dionne, U., Bradley, D., & Landry, C. R.
- Affiliations
- PROTEO (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Jordan, David F.
- Landry, Christian R.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-05-14
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12505296
- OpenAlex
- W4412933707
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation (387697, 525827)
- Human Frontier Science Program (RGP34/2018)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- SH3 domain, short linear motifs, protein-protein interaction, Pbs2, Sho1, MAP kinase kinase, binding affinity, binding specificity, osmosensor, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, deep mutational scanning, protein complementation, binding site model
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, src Homology Domains, Amino Acid Motifs, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review