PreprintCited by 17Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate Conformation Sampling via Protein Structural Diffusion

Open access
Fan, Jiahao, Li, Ziyao, Alcaide, Eric, Ke, Guolin, Huang, Huaqing, Weinan, E·2024·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00928 · Paper page

Abstract

Accurately sampling of protein conformations is pivotal for advances in biology and medicine. Although there have been tremendous progress in protein structure prediction in recent years due to deep learning, models that can predict the different stable conformations of proteins with high accuracy and structural validity are still lacking. Here, we introduce UFConf, a cutting-edge approach designed for robust sampling of diverse protein conformations based solely on amino acid sequences. This method transforms AlphaFold2 into a diffusion model by implementing a conformation-based diffusion process and adapting the architecture to process diffused inputs effectively. To counteract the inherent conformational bias in the Protein Data Bank, we developed a novel hierarchical reweighting protocol based on structural clustering. Our evaluations demonstrate that UFConf out-performs existing methods in terms of successful sampling and structural validity. The comparisons with long time molecular dynamics show that UFConf can overcome the energy barrier existing in molecular dynamics simulations and perform more efficient sampling. Furthermore, We showcase UFConf’s utility in drug discovery through its application in neural protein-ligand docking. In a blind test, it accurately predicted a novel protein-ligand complex, underscoring its potential to impact real-world biological research. Additionally, we present other modes of sampling using UFConf, including partial sampling with fixed motif, langevin dynamics and structural interpolation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.20.594916

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1021/jacs.6b05425 · DOI
  2. Tuckerman, M. E. Statistical mechanics: theory and molecular simulation. 2023, · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01123-9 · DOI
  4. 2011, Metadynamics, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 1, 826
  5. 2011, Umbrella sampling, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 1, 932
  6. Wayment-Steele, H. K. ; Ojoawo, A. ; Otten, R. ; Apitz, J. M. ; Pitsawong, W. ; Hömberger, M. ; Ovchinnikov, S. ; Colwell, L. ; Kern, D. Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2. Nature 2023, 1–3. · DOI
  7. 2023, others Towards Predicting Equilibrium Distributions for Molecular Systems with Deep Learning, arXiv preprint
  8. Jing, B. ; Berger, B. ; Jaakkola, T. AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles. NeurIPS 2023 AI for Science Workshop. 2023.
  9. Abramson, J. ; Adler, J. ; Dunger, J. ; Evans, R. ; Green, T. ; Pritzel, A. ; Ronneberger, O. ; Willmore, L. ; Ballard, A. J. ; Bambrick, J. ; others Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 2024, 1–3. · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2023, others De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature, 620, 1089, 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2023, SE (3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation, arXiv preprint
  12. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Li, Z. ; Liu, X. ; Chen, W. ; Shen, F. ; Bi, H. ; Ke, G. ; Zhang, L. Uni-Fold: an open-source platform for developing protein folding models beyond AlphaFold. bioRxiv 2022, 2022–08. · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/S41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2021, Do transformers really perform badly for graph representation?, Advances in neural information processing systems, 34, 28877
  17. 2022, Geodiff: A geometric diffusion model for molecular conformation generation, arXiv preprint
  18. Ahdritz, G. ; Bouatta, N. ; Kadyan, S. ; Xia, Q. ; Gerecke, W. ; O’Donnell, T. J. ; Berenberg, D. ; Fisk, I. ; Zanichelli, N. ; Zhang, B. ; others OpenFold: Retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization. bioRxiv 2022, 2022–11. · DOI
  19. 2023, others A conformation-locking inhibitor of SLC15A4 with TASL proteostatic anti-inflammatory activity, Nat. Commun, 14, 6626, 10.1038/s41467-023-42070-3 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41598-017-15571-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/ci300604z · DOI
  22. 2022, Diffdock: Diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking, arXiv preprint
  23. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-1 · DOI
  24. Zhou, G. ; Gao, Z. ; Ding, Q. ; Zheng, H. ; Xu, H. ; Wei, Z. ; Zhang, L. ; Ke, G. Uni-Mol: A Universal 3D Molecular Representation Learning Framework. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. 2023. · DOI
  25. Alcaide, E. ; Li, Z. ; Zheng, H. ; Gao, Z. ; Ke, G. UMD-fit: Generating Realistic Ligand Conformations for Distance-Based Deep Docking Models. NeurIPS 2023 Generative AI and Biology (GenBio) Workshop. 2023.
  26. 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00018-4 · DOI
  27. Evans, R. ; O’Neill, M. ; Pritzel, A. ; Antropova, N. ; Senior, A. ; Green, T. ; Žídek, A. ; Bates, R. ; Blackwell, S. ; Yim, J. ; others Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. biorxiv 2021, 2021–10. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Sohl-Dickstein, J. ; Weiss, E. ; Maheswaranathan, N. ; Ganguli, S. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. International conference on machine learning. 2015; pp 2256–2265.
  29. 10.48550/ARXIV.2006.11239 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2020, Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations, arXiv preprint
  31. 2022, Antigen-specific antibody design and optimization with diffusion-based generative models for protein structures, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 9754
  32. Ingraham, J. B. ; Baranov, M. ; Costello, Z. ; Barber, K. W. ; Wang, W. ; Ismail, A. ; Frappier, V. ; Lord, D. M. ; Ng-Thow-Hing, C. ; Van Vlack, E. R. ; others Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. Nature 2023, 1–9. · DOI · Paper page
  33. 2023, EigenFold: Generative Protein Structure Prediction with Diffusion Models, arXiv preprint
  34. 2022, Riemannian score-based generative modelling, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 2406
  35. 1997, others Normal distribution on the rotation group SO (3), Texture, Stress, and Microstructure, 29, 201, 10.1155/TSM.29.201 · DOI
  36. Nichol, A. Q. ; Dhariwal, P. Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2021; pp 8162–8171.
  37. He, K. ; Zhang, X. ; Ren, S. ; Sun, J. Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks. Computer Vision – ECCV 2016. Cham, 2016; pp 630–645. · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2023, Evaluation of the Ability of AlphaFold to Predict the Three-Dimensional Structures of Antibodies and Epitopes, J. Immun, 211, 1578, 10.4049/jimmunol.2300150 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2023, Two for one: Diffusion models and force fields for coarse-grained molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 19, 6151, 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00702 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fan, J., Li, Z., Alcaide, E., Ke, G., Huang, H., & Weinan, E.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Ke, Guolin
  • Huang, Huaqing
  • Weinan, E
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-21
Volume
64
Issue
22
Pages
8414-8426
ISSN
1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402939815
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (12474056, 12074006)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFA1401600)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
diffusion models, AlphaFold2, conformational bias, structural clustering, molecular dynamics sampling, protein-ligand docking, drug discovery, Langevin dynamics, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Diffusion, Ligands, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Databases, Protein, Drug Discovery, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review