PreprintCited by 4Genomics and Rare DiseasesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance of a Protein Language Model for Variant Annotation in Cardiac Disease

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1161/jaha.124.036921

Abstract

Introduction: Genetic testing is a cornerstone in the assessment of many cardiac diseases. However, variants are frequently classified as Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS), limiting the utility of testing. Recently, the DeepMind group (Google, USA) developed AlphaMissense, a unique Artificial Intelligence (AI) based model, based on language model principles for the prediction of missense variant pathogenicity. Objective: To report on the performance of AlphaMissense, accessed by VarCardio, an open web-based variant annotation engine, in a real-world cardiovascular genetics center. Methods: All genetic variants from an inherited arrhythmia program were examined using AlphaMissense via VarCard.io and compared to the ClinVar variant classification system, as well as another variant classification platform (Franklin by Genoox). The mutation reclassification rate and genotype phenotype concordance were examined for all variants in the study. Results: We included 266 patients with heritable cardiac diseases, harboring 339 missense variants. Of those, 230 (67.8%) were classified by ClinVar as either VUS or non-classified. Using VarCard.io, 198 VUSs (86.1%, CI 80.9-90.3%) were reclassified to either Likely Pathgenic (LP) or Likely benign (LB). The reclassification rate was significantly higher for VarCard.io than for Franklin (86.1% vs 34.8%, p<0.001). Genotype-Phenotype concordance was highly aligned using VarCard.io predictions, at 95.9% (CI 92.8-97.9%) concordance rate. For 109 variants classified as Pathogenic, LP, Benign or LB by ClinVar, concordance with VarCard.io was high (90.5%). Conclusion: AlphaMissense, accessed via VarCard.io, may be a highly efficient tool for cardiac genetic variant interpretation. The engine’s notable performance in assessing variants that are classified as VUS in ClinVar, demonstrates its potential to enhance cardiac genetic testing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.06.04.24308460

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 2017, Role of Genetic Testing in Inherited Cardiovascular Disease: A Review, JAMA Cardiology, 2, 1153, 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2352 · DOI
  2. 10.4103/0974-2069.164695 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.034 · DOI
  4. 2022, Next-Generation Sequencing Gene Panels in Inheritable Cardiomyopathies and Channelopathies: Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants and Variants of Unknown Significance in Uncommon Genes, Biomolecules, 12, 1417, 10.3390/biom12101417 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s12471-019-1250-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.008 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100947 · DOI
  8. 2023, Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense, Science, 381, eadg7492, 10.1126/science.adg7492 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/nar/gkz972 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1056/NEJMsr1406261 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2020, Evaluation of Clinical Practices Related to Variants of Uncertain Significance Results in Inherited Cardiac Arrhythmia and Inherited Cardiomyopathy Genes, Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, 13, e002789
  12. 2018, Ability of Patients to Distinguish Among Cardiac Genomic Variant Subclassifications, Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, 11, e001975
  13. 10.1093/nar/gkg509 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.013 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Hochstadt, A., Barbhaiya, C., Aizer, A., Bernstein, S., Cerrone, M., Garber, L., Holmes, D., Knotts, R. J., Kushnir, A., Martin, J., Park, D., Spinelli, M., Yang, F., Chinitz, L. A., & Jankelson, L.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Jankelson, Lior
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-06-05
Volume
13
Issue
20
Pages
e036921-e036921
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403337622
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
AlphaMissense, protein language models, variant annotation, missense mutations, variants of uncertain significance, variant reclassification, genotype-phenotype concordance, ClinVar, genetic testing
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Genetic Testing, Heart Diseases, Humans, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mutation, Missense, Databases, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review