Cited by 2,908Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants

Open access
Ioannidis, Nilah M., Rothstein, Joseph H., Pejaver, Vikas, Middha, Sumit, McDonnell, Shannon K., Baheti, Saurabh, Musolf, Anthony, Li, Qing +33 more·2016·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

The vast majority of coding variants are rare, and assessment of the contribution of rare variants to complex traits is hampered by low statistical power and limited functional data. Improved methods for predicting the pathogenicity of rare coding variants are needed to facilitate the discovery of disease variants from exome sequencing studies. We developed REVEL (rare exome variant ensemble learner), an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants on the basis of individual tools: MutPred, FATHMM, VEST, PolyPhen, SIFT, PROVEAN, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster, LRT, GERP, SiPhy, phyloP, and phastCons. REVEL was trained with recently discovered pathogenic and rare neutral missense variants, excluding those previously used to train its constituent tools. When applied to two independent test sets, REVEL had the best overall performance (p -12 ) as compared to any individual tool and seven ensemble methods: MetaSVM, MetaLR, KGGSeq, Condel, CADD, DANN, and Eigen. Importantly, REVEL also had the best performance for distinguishing pathogenic from rare neutral variants with allele frequencies <0.5%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for REVEL was 0.046-0.182 higher in an independent test set of 935 recent SwissVar disease variants and 123,935 putatively neutral exome sequencing variants and 0.027-0.143 higher in an independent test set of 1,953 pathogenic and 2,406 benign variants recently reported in ClinVar than the AUCs for…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All variants were prioritized considering allele frequency in gnomAD v4.0.0 below 1%, impact on protein function via different in silico programs, and involvement of candidate genes in neuronal processes.

    “All variants were prioritized considering allele frequency in gnomAD v4.0.0 (Karczewski et al. 2020) below 1%, impact on protein function via different in silico programs (CADD (Rentzsch et al. 2021), REVEL (Ioannidis et al. 2016), MutPred2 (Pejaver et al. 2020) and Metadome (Wiel et al. 2019)) and involvement of candidate genes in neuronal processes.”
  • The rare significant (P ≤ 1 × 10−8) and suggestive (1 × 10−8 < P ≤ 1 × 10−4) missense cis-CDS pQTLs were more likely to be predicted damaging by REVEL.

    “Moreover, the rare significant (P ≤ 1 × 10−8) and suggestive (1 × 10−8 < P ≤ 1 × 10−4) missense cis-CDS pQTLs were more likely to be predicted damaging by the in silico predictor, REVEL16 (Extended Data Fig. 3b).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ioannidis, N. M., Rothstein, J. H., Pejaver, V., Middha, S., McDonnell, S. K., Baheti, S., Musolf, A., Li, Q., Holzinger, E., Karyadi, D., Cannon-Albright, L. A., Teerlink, C. C., Stanford, J. L., Isaacs, W. B., Xu, J., Cooney, K. A., Lange, E. M., Schleutker, J., Carpten, J. D., Powell, I. J., Cussenot, O., Cancel-Tassin, G., Giles, G. G., MacInnis, R. J., Maier, C., Hsieh, C.-L., Wiklund, F., Catalona, W. J., Foulkes, W. D., Mandal, D., Eeles, R. A., Kote-Jarai, Z., Bustamante, C. D., Schaid, D. J., Hastie, T., Ostrander, E. A., Bailey-Wilson, J. E., Radivojac, P., Thibodeau, S. N., Whittemore, A. S., & Sieh, W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Endeavor Health (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Montreal General Hospital (CA)
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Sieh, Weiva
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
877-885
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2521967673
Cited by
2,908
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 465 · 2025: 528 · 2024: 480 · 2023: 374 · 2022: 318 · 2021: 279 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 151 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
71.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Emory University
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10096)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH105524)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (F32HG008330)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA094069, U01CA089600, K07CA143047, P50CA180995, P30CA060553)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM009722)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
rare missense variants, pathogenicity prediction, ensemble learning, REVEL, pathogenic variants, ClinVar, exome sequencing, allele frequency
MeSH terms
Disease, DNA Mutational Analysis, Gene Frequency, Humans, ROC Curve, Software, Area Under Curve, Mutation, Missense, Exome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review