PreprintCited by 2Insect Pheromone Research and ControlInsect Utilization and EffectsInsect behavior and control techniques

A chemically defined oviposition attractant and repellent of Black Soldier Flies ( Hermetia illucens )

Open access
Thomas, Nyasha KT, Karpati, Zsolt, Schmitt, Thomas, Riabinina, Olena·2024·Journal of Insects as Food and Feed

Preprint — published as 10.1163/23524588-bja10312

Abstract

Black Soldier Flies (BSF), Hermetia illucens , are industrially important species. They can consume large amounts of spoilt organic material as larvae and bio-convert it to more useful biomass. Female BSF lay eggs in crevices adjacent to spoilt organic materials that serve as an oviposition attractant. These kairomones are central to maximising rearing efforts, yet the composition and origin of oviposition cues remain undefined, and no synthetic oviposition attractants are currently available. This work aimed to identify key components of naturally occurring oviposition attractants and to formulate an effective synthetic alternative for BSF. We have developed a novel oviposition assay and found larval food- and frass-based attractants to be the most effective at centralizing egg laying. We have identified the volatile compounds in the headspaces of putative attractants and established that the antennae of the female flies respond to some of these compounds. Behavioural validation using synthetic compounds allowed us to generate a mixture of 5 compounds (p-cresol, decanal, sulcatone, pentanoic acid, acetophenone) that cues oviposition as efficiently as currently used natural oviposition attractants. We also identified a synthetic mixture that deters oviposition in BSF. The synthetic attractant and repellent we generated are likely to simplify BSF rearing in research and industrial settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.06.04.597456

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synthetic blends combining multiple VOCs elicit stronger responses than individual components alone.

    “Because synthetic blends combining multiple VOCs elicit stronger responses than individual components alone (Thomas et al. 2024)”

    From Beyond the Black Box: Reproductive Strategies of the Black Soldier Fly as a Model for Bridging Evolutionary Biology and Applied Entomology (2026) · cites this paper as Thomas et al. 2024

    In “Behavioural responses to artificial mixes” (p. 8), the five-compound Mixture 1 attracted oviposition, while neither of its two smaller submixtures was significantly attractive. The authors infer that more than one compound is needed, but they did not report a direct comparison with each individual component; the result also concerns black soldier fly oviposition rather than VOC blends and responses generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Authors
Thomas, N. K., Karpati, Z., Schmitt, T., & Riabinina, O.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Riabinina, Olena
Venue
Journal of Insects as Food and Feed
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-06-06
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
849-861
ISSN
2352-4588 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7092358629
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Insects as Food and Feed (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Durham University
  • Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, oviposition attractants, synthetic attractants, volatile compounds, antennal response, p-cresol, decanal, valeric acid, acetophenone, frass, larval food, oviposition, insect rearing, organic waste bioconversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review