PreprintCited by 0Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Rare DiseasesProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncovering differential tolerance to deletions versus substitutions with a protein language model

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cels.2025.101373 · Paper page

Abstract

Deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments have been successfully leveraged to understand genotype to phenotype mapping, with broad implications for protein engineering, human genetics, drug development, and beyond. To date, however, the overwhelming majority of DMS have focused on amino acid substitutions, excluding other classes of variation such as deletions or insertions. As a consequence, it remains unclear how indels differentially shape the fitness landscape relative to substitutions. In order to further our understanding of the relationship between substitutions and deletions, we leveraged a protein language model to analyze every single amino acid deletion in the human proteome. We discovered hundreds of thousands of sites that display opposing behavior for deletions versus substitutions, i.e. sites that can tolerate being substituted but not deleted, and vice versa. We identified secondary structural elements and sequence context to be important mediators of differential tolerability at these sites. Our results underscore the value of deletion-substitution comparisons at the genome-wide scale, provide novel insights into how substitutions could systematically differ from deletions, and showcase the power of protein language models to generate biological hypotheses in-silico . All deletion-substitution comparisons can be explored and downloaded at https://huggingface.co/spaces/ntranoslab/diff-tol .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.06.27.601077

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Rehm, H. L. & Fowler, D. M . Keeping up with the genomes: Scaling genomic variant interpretation. Genome Medicine 12, (2019). · DOI
  2. 2022, Recent Advances in Machine Learning Variant Effect Prediction Tools for Protein Engineering, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 61, 6235, 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04943 · DOI
  3. 2023, Genome-wide prediction of disease variant effects with a deep protein language model, Nat Genet, 55, 1512, 10.1038/s41588-023-01465-0 · DOI
  4. Frazer, J. et al. Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data. Nature 599, (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Esposito, D. et al. MaveDB: an open-source platform to distribute and interpret data from multiplexed assays of variant effect. Genome Biol 20, 223 (2019). · DOI
  6. 10.1101/2023.12.07.570727 · DOI
  7. Macdonald, C. B. et al. DIMPLE: deep insertion, deletion, and missense mutation libraries for exploring protein variation in evolution, disease, and biology. Genome Biol 24, 36 (2023). · DOI
  8. Savino, S. , Desmet, T. & Franceus, J . Insertions and deletions in protein evolution and engineering. Biotechnology Advances 60, 108010 (2022). · DOI
  9. Zhang, Z. , Wang, J. , Gong, Y. & Li, Y . Contributions of substitutions and indels to the structural variations in ancient protein superfamilies. BMC Genomics 19, 771 (2018). · DOI
  10. 2023, Mega-scale experimental analysis of protein folding stability in biology and design, Nature, 620, 434, 10.1038/s41586-023-06328-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bepler, T. & Berger, B . Learning the protein language: Evolution, structure, and function. Cell Systems 12, (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lafita, A. et al. Fine-tuning Protein Language Models with Deep Mutational Scanning improves Variant Effect Prediction. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06729 (2024). · arXiv
  14. 10.1101/2021.07.09.450648 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rives, A. et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118, (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkv1222 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1101/2023.10.06.561180 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1215206110 · DOI
  21. Kim, R. & Guo, J . Systematic analysis of short internal indels and their impact on protein folding. BMC Struct Biol 10, 24 (2010). · DOI
  22. 10.1002/prot.24932 · DOI
  23. 2006, Effects of Glycine Substitutions on the Structure and Function of Gramicidin A Channels, Biochemistry, 45, 14012, 10.1021/bi061560z · DOI
  24. 2017, Functional characterization of missense mutations in severe methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency using a human expression system, J of Inher Metab Disea, 40, 297, 10.1007/s10545-016-9987-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s004390100493 · DOI
  26. 2024, Protein language models meet reduced amino acid alphabets, Bioinformatics, 40, btae061, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae061 · DOI
  27. 2018, Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time, Nat Commun, 9, 2542, 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2022, Research progress of reduced amino acid alphabets in protein analysis and prediction, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 20, 3503, 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.001 · DOI
  29. 2006, All individual domains of staphylococcal protein A show Fab binding, FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 20, 69, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01112.x · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5399 · DOI
  31. Xiang, J. et al. Reinterpretation of common pathogenic variants in ClinVar revealed a high proportion of downgrades. Sci Rep 10, 331 (2020). · DOI
  32. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201954 · DOI
  33. 2022, Digenic inheritance of STUB1 variants and TBP polyglutamine expansions explains the incomplete penetrance of SCA17 and SCA48, Genetics in Medicine, 24, 29, 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.003 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2022, Learning functional properties of proteins with language models, Nat Mach Intell, 4, 227, 10.1038/s42256-022-00457-9 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41467-020-19669-x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1101/2021.11.09.467890 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.48550/ARXIV.2006.15222 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/humu.22911 · DOI
  42. 2018, Patterns of Nucleotide Deletion and Insertion Inferred from Bacterial Pseudogenes, Genome Biology and Evolution, 10, 1792, 10.1093/gbe/evy140 · DOI
  43. 2017, Effects of short indels on protein structure and function in human genomes, Sci Rep, 7, 9313, 10.1038/s41598-017-09287-x · DOI
  44. 10.1101/gr.1977804 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.str.2014.03.014 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Goldman, G., Chati, P., & Ntranos, V.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Ntranos, Vasilis
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-02
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
101373-101373
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414013285
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG013524)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM150479)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI129731)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
amino acid deletion, amino acid substitutions, protein language models, deep mutational scanning, fitness landscape, genotype-phenotype mapping, protein secondary structure, sequence context, human proteome, protein evolution
MeSH terms
Humans, Proteins, Sequence Deletion, Amino Acid Substitution, Proteome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review