PreprintCited by 9Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contrasting Kinetics of Highly Similar Chloroalkane Reductive Dehalogenases

Open access
Picott, Katherine J., Edwards, Elizabeth A.·2024·Environmental Science & Technology

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.est.4c07149 · Paper page

Abstract

Chloroform and trichloroethanes are pervasive groundwater contaminants for which bioremediation has been an effective treatment strategy. Reductive dehalogenase (RDase) enzymes from organohalide-respiring bacteria are essential for their remediation under anaerobic conditions. RDases are responsible for dehalogenating these chlorinated solvents, leading to their removal. This work explores the kinetic characteristics of three closely related Dehalobacter chloroalkane-reductases—TmrA, CfrA, and AcdA—and identifies differences between their activity on chloroform (CF), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA), and 1,1,2-TCA. The side-by-side comparison of these enzymes has emphasized that TmrA and AcdA are specialized toward CF with both having 4-fold higher maximum specific activity ( V max ) on CF than 1,1,1-TCA, whereas, CfrA has very similar rates on both CF and 1,1,1-TCA. AcdA is the most sensitive to substrate inhibition by CF and 1,1,2-TCA, and inhibition by a common co-contaminant trichloroethene. Finally, the reduction of 1,1,2-TCA, which can produce both 1,2-dichloroethane and vinyl chloride, was assessed for each enzyme. Interestingly, each enzyme has a distinct preference for the major product it produces, indicating a favoured reaction pathway. Despite over 95% sequence identity, TmrA, CfrA, and AcdA exhibit substantial differences in kinetic behaviour, highlighting the importance of understanding such nuances for informed bioremediation strategies. SYNOPSIS: Three similar dechlorinating enzymes were found to have distinct reaction rates and levels of sensitivity to inhibition. These differences have implications for the enzymes’ use in bioremediation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.10.602960

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1007/s11157-014-9345-3 · DOI
  2. Amber, W. R. ; Aziz, C. E. ; Bruce, C. L. ; Cox, E. ; Criddle, C. S. ; Dybas, M. J. ; Edwards, E. A. ; Giddings, C. G. S. ; Gossett, J. M. ; Harkness, M. ; et al. Bioaugmentation for Groundwater Remediation; Stroo, H. F. , Leeson, A. , Ward, C. H. , Eds.; Springer, 2013.
  3. 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110925 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/1462-2920.13287 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/1462-2920.12387 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0119507 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00253-017-8236-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152659 · DOI
  10. 10.1128/AEM.01269-06 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02656.x · DOI
  12. 10.1128/aem.01970-21 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acs.est.3c06686 · DOI
  14. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044829 · DOI
  15. Hug, L. A. ; Maphosa, F. ; Leys, D. ; Löffler, F. E. ; Smidt, H. ; Edwards, E. A. ; Adrian, L . Overview of Organohalide-Respiring Bacteria and a Proposal for a Classification System for Reductive Dehalogenases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2013, 368, 20120322. · DOI
  16. 10.1039/c9em00605b · DOI
  17. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00558 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/febs.14258 · DOI
  19. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0318 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/1751-7915.12745 · DOI
  21. 10.1128/aem.00732-24 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.est.8b03717 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/femsec/fiac072 · DOI
  24. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00249 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/AEM.01993-21 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acschembio.7b00846 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/es901038x · DOI
  28. Wei, K. ; Grostern, A. ; Chan, W. W. M. ; Richardson, R. E. ; Edwards, E. A . Electron Acceptor Interactions Between Organohalide-Respiring Bacteria: Cross-Feeding, Competition, and Inhibition. In Organohalide-Respiring Bacteria; Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2016; pp 283–308. · DOI
  29. 10.1128/JB.00496-19 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01205 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1664-1667.2005 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0045-6535(89)90016-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/es00165a008 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1002/prot.22570 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.1258118 · DOI
  38. 10.1128/AEM.02037-08 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02150.x · DOI
  40. Mackay, D. ; Shiu, W.-Y. ; Ma, K.-C. ; Lee, S. C. Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, 2nd ed.; CRC Press, 2006. · DOI
  41. 10.1021/es0504587 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.000535 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1517/17425255.2016.1121234 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00151-3 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/acs.est.3c04535 · DOI
  46. Dolfing, J. Energetic Considerations in Organohalide Respiration. In Organohalide-Respiring Bacteria; Springer, 2016; pp 31–48. · DOI
  47. 10.1038/ismej.2016.158 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/ismej.2015.197 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nchembio.2512 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nature13901 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/acscatal.2c06306 · DOI
  52. 10.1021/acs.est.3c06231 · DOI
  53. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00207 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116310 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Picott, K. J., & Edwards, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-11
Volume
58
Issue
50
Pages
22235-22244
ISSN
0013-936X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404950115
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of Ontario
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
reductive dehalogenase, Dehalobacter, enzyme kinetics, chloroform, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, substrate inhibition, trichloroethylene, organohalide-respiring bacteria, bioremediation, groundwater contaminants, 1,2-dichloroethane, vinyl chloride, product specificity
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Kinetics, Trichloroethanes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review