PreprintCited by 50DNA Repair MechanismsNuclear Structure and FunctionGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

STK19 positions TFIIH for cell-free transcription-coupled DNA repair

Open access
Mevissen, Tycho E.T., Kümmecke, Maximilian, Schmid, Ernst W., Farnung, Lucas, Walter, Johannes C.·2024·Cell

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.020 · Paper page

Abstract

In transcription-coupled repair, stalled RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is recognized by CSB and CRL4 CSA , which co-operate with UVSSSA and ELOF1 to recruit TFIIH for nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER). To explore the mechanism of TC-NER, we recapitulated this reaction in vitro . When a plasmid containing a site-specific lesion is transcribed in frog egg extract, error-free repair is observed that depends on CSB, CRL4 CSA , UVSSA, and ELOF1. Repair also depends on STK19, a factor previously implicated in transcription recovery after UV exposure. A 1.9 Å cryo-electron microscopy structure shows that STK19 joins the TC-NER complex by binding CSA and the RPB1 subunit of Pol II. Furthermore, AlphaFold predicts that STK19 interacts with the XPD subunit of TFIIH, and disrupting this interface impairs cell-free repair. Molecular modeling suggests that STK19 positions TFIIH ahead of Pol II for lesion verification. In summary, our analysis of cell-free TC-NER suggests that STK19 couples RNA polymerase II stalling to downstream repair events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.22.604623

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mevissen, T. E. T., Kümmecke, M., Schmid, E. W., Farnung, L., & Walter, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Farnung, Lucas
  • Walter, Johannes C.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-23
Volume
187
Issue
25
Pages
7091-7106.e24
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404374986
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Cancer Society
  • European Molecular Biology Organization
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL098316)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (DP2ES036404)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
TFIIH, transcription-coupled repair, XPD, RNA polymerase II, RPB1, CSA, UV-induced DNA damage, protein complex structure, DNA repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review