PreprintCited by 21Protein Structure and DynamicsNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parametrically guided design of beta barrels and transmembrane nanopores using deep learning

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2425459122 · Paper page

Abstract

Francis Crick’s global parameterization of coiled coil geometry has been widely useful for guiding design of new protein structures and functions. However, design guided by similar global parameterization of beta barrel structures has been less successful, likely due to the deviations from ideal barrel geometry required to maintain inter-strand hydrogen bonding without introducing backbone strain. Instead, beta barrels have been designed using 2D structural blueprints; while this approach has successfully generated new fluorescent proteins, transmembrane nanopores, and other structures, it requires expert knowledge and provides only indirect control over the global shape. Here we show that the simplicity and control over shape and structure provided by parametric representations can be generalized beyond coiled coils by taking advantage of the rich sequence-structure relationships implicit in RoseTTAFold based design methods. Starting from parametrically generated barrel backbones, both RFjoint inpainting and RFdiffusion readily incorporate backbone irregularities necessary for proper folding with minimal deviation from the idealized barrel geometries. We show that for beta barrels across a broad range of beta sheet parameterizations, these methods achieve high in silico and experimental success rates, with atomic accuracy confirmed by an X-ray crystal structure of a novel barrel topology, and de novo designed 12, 14, and 16 stranded transmembrane nanopores with conductances ranging from 200 to 500 pS. By combining the simplicity and control of parametric generation with the high success rates of deep learning based protein design methods, our approach makes the design of proteins where global shape confers function, such as beta barrel nanopores, more precisely specifiable and accessible. Significance: De novo beta barrel proteins have previously been designed using “blueprint” based methods which require expert knowledge of the rules of folding and provide only indirect control of the overall barrel shape by specifying structural features such as glycine kinks and beta bulges. The barrel shape can be directly modeled using global parametric methods, but to date such methods have not succeeded in generating folded proteins, likely due to the absence of such structural features. Here, we describe methods that combine the simplicity and control of parametric barrel specification with the high success rates of deep learning based protein design methods to successfully design new beta barrel folds of different and pre-specified sizes, including both soluble designs and transmembrane nanopores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.22.604663

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1107/S0365110X53001952 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1257481 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.058 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1198841 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41586-018-0802-y · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41586-018-0509-0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.2207974120 · DOI
  8. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1501 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.abc8182 · DOI
  10. 10.1101/2023.12.20.572500 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90370-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41586-021-04184-w · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1126/science.abn2100 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1126/science.add1964 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1101/2023.02.24.529906 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41586-023-06953-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.85.10.3338 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90064-7 · DOI
  21. 1994, Principles determining the structure of beta-sheet barrels in proteins, II. The observed structures. J. Mol. Biol, 236, 1382
  22. 10.1002/jcc.20624 · DOI
  23. 10.48550/ARXIV.2205.15019 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2010, PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 26, 689
  26. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1002/pro.4405 · DOI
  31. 10.1101/2023.12.20.572602 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41565-021-01008-w · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1525308113 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41594-018-0141-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.1412768111 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.238101 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1101/2023.02.25.529956 · DOI
  38. Bommasani, R. , et al. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv.org https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258v3 (2021). · arXiv
  39. 10.1021/ja209895m · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.0904191106 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41592-019-0357-3 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/pro.5560041120 · DOI
  43. 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Kim, D. E., Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Majumder, S., Sonigra, R., Gerben, S. R., Kang, A., Bera, A. K., Li, X., & Baker, D.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, David E.
  • Watson, Joseph L.
  • Juergens, David
  • Majumder, Sagardip
  • Baker, David
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-23
Volume
122
Issue
38
Pages
e2425459122-e2425459122
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414195098
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, DE‐SC0012704, 05CH11231, KP1607011, DE AC02 05CH11231, SC0012704., P30GM133893, DE-AC02-)
  • National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (DE–AC02–05CH11231, 05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231)
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC02–05CH11231)
  • Office of Science (DE-SC-0012704, DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, SC0012704, KP1607011)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DE-AC02-05CH11231, P30GM133893)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (05CH11231, DE-SC0012704, DE-AC02 − 05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, KP1607011)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (SC0012704, DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE- SC0012704)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (AC02‐05CH11231, DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-SC0012704, 05CH11231)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
beta-barrel proteins, protein design, RoseTTAFold, RFdiffusion, de novo protein design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review