PreprintCited by 25Machine Learning in BioinformaticsCell Image Analysis TechniquesProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of protein subcellular localization in single cells

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41592-025-02696-1

Abstract

The subcellular localization of a protein is important for its function and interaction with other molecules, and its mislocalization is linked to numerous diseases. While atlas-scale efforts have been made to profile protein localization across various cell lines, existing datasets only contain limited pairs of proteins and cell lines which do not cover all human proteins. We present a method that uses both protein sequences and cellular landmark images to perform P redictions of U nseen P roteins’ S ubcellular localization ( PUPS ), which can generalize to both proteins and cell lines not used for model training. PUPS combines a protein language model and an image inpainting model to utilize both protein sequence and cellular images for protein localization prediction. The protein sequence input enables generalization to unseen proteins and the cellular image input enables cell type specific prediction that captures single-cell variability. PUPS’ ability to generalize to unseen proteins and cell lines enables us to assess the variability in protein localization across cell lines as well as across single cells within a cell line and to identify the biological processes associated with the proteins that have variable localization. Experimental validation shows that PUPS can be used to predict protein localization in newly performed experiments outside of the Human Protein Atlas used for training. Collectively, PUPS utilizes both protein sequences and cellular images to predict protein localization in unseen proteins and cell lines with the ability to capture single-cell variability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.25.605178

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Laurila, K. & Vihinen, M . Prediction of disease-related mutations affecting protein localization. BMC Genomics 10, 122 (2009). · DOI
  2. Park, S. et al. Protein localization as a principal feature of the etiology and comorbidity of genetic diseases. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 494 (2011). · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.035 · DOI
  4. 2020, Overview of multiplex immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence techniques in the era of cancer immunotherapy, Cancer Commun, 40, 135, 10.1002/cac2.12023 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx431 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/pmic.201000274 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/2022.05.27.493774 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/2024.04.15.589616 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/s41592-019-0658-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2022, Self-supervised deep learning encodes high-resolution features of protein subcellular localization, Nat. Methods, 19, 995, 10.1038/s41592-022-01541-z · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007348 · DOI
  13. 10.48550/arXiv.1610.02357 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2021, Consistency and variation of protein subcellular location annotations, Proteins, 89, 242, 10.1002/prot.26010 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.1300801110 · DOI
  16. Yang, K. D. et al. Multi-domain translation between single-cell imaging and sequencing data using autoencoders. Nat. Commun. 12, 31 (2021). · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41467-022-35233-1 · DOI
  18. Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017).
  19. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009736 · DOI
  20. 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-jpwvn · DOI
  21. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2174/138920309788452164 · DOI
  23. Bartko, J. C. , Li, Y. , Sun, Z. & Halterman, M. W . Phosphorylation within the bipartite NLS alters the localization and toxicity of the ER stress response factor DDIT3/CHOP. Cell. Signal. 74, 109713 (2020). · DOI
  24. 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1156 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/emboj/cdg140 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1126/science.1260419 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lopes-Ramos, C. M. et al. Regulatory network changes between cell lines and their tissues of origin. BMC Genomics 18, 723 (2017). · DOI
  29. Goodfellow, I. , Bengio, Y. & Courville, A . Deep Learning. (MIT Press, 2016).
  30. 33. Stärk, H. , Dallago, C. , Heinzinger, M. & Rost, B. Light attention predicts protein location from the language of life. Bioinforma. Adv. 1, vbab035 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nar/gkz1138 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 · DOI
  34. 10.7717/peerj.453 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_30 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1021/ac60214a047 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Homo sapiens Annotation Report. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/annotation_euk/Homo_sapiens/GCF_009914755.1-RS_2023_10/.

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., Tseo, Y., Bai, Y., Chen, F., & Uhler, C.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Fei
  • Uhler, Caroline
Venue
Nature Methods
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-25
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
1265-1275
ISSN
1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410325433
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 9
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (N000142212116)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0023187)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1DP2AT012345, 1745302, R01HG010647, 2141064)
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Harvard University
  • National Institutes of Health (2141064, 1745302, 1dp2at012345-01)
  • Harvard Stem Cell Institute
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-22-1-2116)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG010647)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM087237)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (RC2DK135492)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (DP2 AT012345, 1DP2AT012345)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein localization, protein language models, image inpainting, cell type specificity, Human Protein Atlas, protein mislocalization, pups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review